It's still available, my dude. 2 left.
Weird, I tired a few times. Kept telling me it was sold out.
It's still available, my dude. 2 left.
Dude, that is the best.
Yeah, all the copies were probably immediately carted, but not bought.Weird, I tired a few times. Kept telling me it was sold out.
Everyone just comes into my office and asks "Why do you have a framed picture of Carl Winslow......?" and I tell them to get out.
The Return of the Jedi variant instantly sold out.. I managed to get a regular.
JC and Mark Englert both have super grainy prints. Most of the time the jpegs look better than the actual print.
and this ol' chap:
http://411posters.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/englert-the-flowers-are-still-standing.jpg
Both of which are in my "hm shouldn't have got those because I'm never going to frame them" category (I do like that Bioshock one a lot though).
God fucking damn it, the asshole who runs Cyclops Print Works' twitter account has been teasing Whalen and Perillo Inside Out prints.
How dare she!
Here is one for fancy poster gaf:
Also this.I love that movie, Inside Out
Originally Posted by Captain Blood
I have it framed in my office actually and am very happy with it.
I am a big fan of JC though, sure his style lacks detail when you have your nose 5 inches away from them but at normal viewing distances I think they look great.
And yes I have Al Powell looking down on me to provide sage wisdom while I work.
I have it framed in my office actually and am very happy with it.
http://i.imgur.com/DcdIfNA.jpg[IMG]
I am a big fan of JC though, sure his style lacks detail when you have your nose 5 inches away from them but at normal viewing distances I think they look great.
And yes I have Al Powell looking down on me to provide sage wisdom while I work.[/QUOTE]
Thanks Cap! I think it's probably a little too grainy for my taste now seeing that real world picture. I love the design but I'll pass on his offer. I have the Daniel Danger GOT up in my living room since I love the design but it's just so damn dark.. probably don't want to buy another GOT unless I think it's perfect.
Yo, if you aren't going to frame that Bioshock one let me buy it. I love it but never got the chance to pick it up.
*EDIT* I never even knew the variant had SHODAN in the GID portion. I love the regular one but I love SS2, which makes it really tough to decide which to hunt down...
It's yours if you want it! Would sell it at cost ($60) plus shipping, so lemme know.
16.75" x 35", 10 color screen print with metallic inks and sepia glaze on cream paper, signed and numbered edition of 150, $60
Chuck Sperry can draw some pretty ladies. This is not one of those times. Also what's going on with her right arm there?
Also what's going on with her right arm there?
8 times out of ten, they are pretty ladies. Sometimes though...Chuck Sperry can draw some pretty ladies. This is not one of those times. Also what's going on with her right arm there?
This too.He's got a great habit of fucking up movie posters. It's almost like he doesn't even care.
And finally, yeah, this is what I thought. The arm is fine but the dude's shoulder is way too wide.Her right arm looks fine to me. It's twisted around so her fingers are gripping the edge of the desk. What's more concerning to me is how fucking huge that dude's shoulders are.
I was thinking if I should get this poster. You guys have convinced me its not worth it haha.
Yea that print is not good.
Hail, Caesar! by Francesco Francavilla. 24" x 36" screen print. Hand numbered edition of 275. Printed by D&L Screenprinting. $50
Hail, Caesar! by BLT Communications. 18" x 24" screen print. Hand numbered edition of 125. Printed by Industry Print Shop. $40
The foundation of the drawing is good imo but he doesn't do much to elevate it. Could have done something with his inking or coloring but doesnt.Dude is one of my favorite artists. I've got no issues with the arm (if you have thin wrists position your arm that way--that's what it actually looks like) or the hair, but it's just brutally boring. I'm sure it'll look great in person, but man, there's really nothing to it other than a he literally copied a boring still from the movie.
When an artist is commissioned to do a print for a movie not yet released, do studios or the galleries behind the print ever provide the artist with more than the public would have access to? i.e. do they have to just watch the trailers and work against that, or are the artists ever given access to early screenings for example?
I think it's great that new releases often get prints right off the bat, but I wonder where artists are able to pull inspiration from if they haven't seen the source.
When an artist is commissioned to do a print for a movie not yet released, do studios or the galleries behind the print ever provide the artist with more than the public would have access to? i.e. do they have to just watch the trailers and work against that, or are the artists ever given access to early screenings for example?
I think it's great that new releases often get prints right off the bat, but I wonder where artists are able to pull inspiration from if they haven't seen the source.
I think it depends, sometimes all they get is a trailer, while other times they get screened the film. For Stout's Inglorious Basterds, he never saw the film before making the print which is why Michael Fassbender isn't on it. On the other hand, I'm pretty sure Guillermo Del Toro showed DD Crimson Peak before he made thatWhen an artist is commissioned to do a print for a movie not yet released, do studios or the galleries behind the print ever provide the artist with more than the public would have access to? i.e. do they have to just watch the trailers and work against that, or are the artists ever given access to early screenings for example?
I think it's great that new releases often get prints right off the bat, but I wonder where artists are able to pull inspiration from if they haven't seen the source.
I think it depends, sometimes all they get is a trailer, while other times they get screened the film. For Stout's Inglorious Basterds, he never saw the film before making the print which is why Michael Fassbender isn't on it. On the other hand, I'm pretty sure Guillermo Del Toro showed DD Crimson Peak before he made that
Edit: but it would obviously be nice if all this artwork were made after the artist got to see the films
When an artist is commissioned to do a print for a movie not yet released, do studios or the galleries behind the print ever provide the artist with more than the public would have access to? i.e. do they have to just watch the trailers and work against that, or are the artists ever given access to early screenings for example?
I think it's great that new releases often get prints right off the bat, but I wonder where artists are able to pull inspiration from if they haven't seen the source.
God dammit. I thought I was buying 0 prints this week. I'm such a sucker for Cloonans.
Mondo updates around noon EST, right?
The broad window is 11:30am-12:15pm ET, but more often than not, yeah, it's from 11:45am-12:00pm ET.
Love Becky Cloonan but not really down with these posters, hopefully she'll do more
Yes, we usually provide the artist with more materials than just what's out in public but I think it also depends on the license and the circumstances.
Oooooh WE do do WE??? What you think you're better than me?
To be fair, don't you WORK for Disney, so getting early access to, say, Inside Out, would be easier for you than say Mondo trying to get Tyler access to the new Captain America film?
Yes, we usually provide the artist with more materials than just what's out in public but I think it also depends on the license and the circumstances.