Christopher
Member
But hew's with who I never exchange a word with can be creepy and don't get the word "NO". Won't mention any names.
Most of my PMs stopped when I posted my pride and joy...get busy Second!
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
POPGAF |OT2| Oops!... We Did It Again
- Thread starter Sai-kun
- Start date
- Status
Most of my PMs stopped when I posted my pride and joy...get busy Second!
Some Amber Rose wannabe named Jess Molli recently submitted this to World Star (I know...ratchet in itself) and I've been in Ratchet Heaven ever since.
Jess Molli - "Lick It" (slightly NSFW)
Dancing around my house like I'm up in the club and KNOW everyone want it.
freenudemacusers
Member
Oh oh oh
Oui Oui Oui
That's a verse?
C'mon son
Oui Oui Oui
That's a verse?
C'mon son
Crumpet Trumpet
Banned
How cute, the flop poster pledges allegiance to the flop newspaper. It's got the second lowest circulation of the eleven dailies in Britain, having #DROPPEDT from 403k to 217k in daily circulation, costing the magazine £100,000 every day. Although I'm not quite sure I'm ready to see it go yet, as one of the reviewers for the culture section seems to possess an abundance of unquestionably good taste. I think it's important the newspaper stay in business so that his reviews continue to reach a large audience. Thankfully, The Guardian has a very large online presence which receives heavy traffic, so these reviews could potentially be viewed by as many as 4 million readers each day (67 million unique visitors a month and growing, 1/3 of all visitors are American). Despite generating a sizable online presence, the magazine insists on keeping the site's content free, and has had to let employees go on two occasions in addition to raising the price of the printed newspaper. I'm delighted to report that the Head Pop Critic and Spiller of Truth Tea, Alexis Petridis, is still employed and spilling the tea as of today!
When you tried to shade Janet, you were actually taking a quote out of context from a review that was actually quite positive overall. I'm not sure which scenario makes you look more foolish: thinking that I would not go digging for receipts when you were well-aware that your quote didn't hold up, or that you somehow happened upon just this little snippet and quoted it without doing your own homework. You're embarrassing yourself, dude. But don't go anywhere yet, because the fun's just getting started!
Marius said:
My faves have such good taste.
As the Head Pop Critic for The Guardian, Alexis Petridis happened to review not only Gaga's "The Fame", Kylie's "X", but also Madonna's MDNA tour that Roy pulled a quote from. Since you sought out the opinion of Mr. Petridis in particular, among the hundreds of options, and you stated that The Guardian is one of the world's best magazines in no uncertain terms, I guess I'll go with your reviewer/magazine. If I were to pick my own, magazine/reviewer, there would be too many problems caused by having more than one critic, so I'm just going to hold us both to the one you pulled that quote from. Since he's employed by one of the world's best magazines, he must have a pretty damn good idea what he's talking talking.
This is Head Pop Music Critic for The Guardian, Alexis Petridis. He is unhappy because he just learned that Godelsmetric used Alexis' words for evil-doing.
Janet Jackson: Number Ones World Tour -- 4 out of 5 stars. I won't quote him, elaborate further, or anything like that. Your excerpt in no way misrepresented the content of the review. Well done.
Your fave Lady Gaga: The Fame -- 3 out of 5 stars. Here are some my favorite excerpts from his review, although I had to make some really difficult decisions to cut stuff out because there so many gems in his review.
Alexis Petridis said:
Hopefully you're able to tell that the review above is parodying your own post, in which your desire to troll/instigate drama led you to find an excerpt from a review which reads like a harsh critique of Janet's concert when the frame of reference is not there. Selectively choosing what to quote or ignore for the purpose of creating a narrative to fit your "shading" needs is pretty pathetic. If you're ever going to post receipts again, make sure they're not being printed straight out of your ass, okay?
Your other fave: Kylie Minogue - X: 3 out of 5 stars. The Guardian Review - X If you're going to post a review, this is how it should be done. Either link it/include all the text or don't even bother. However, attempting to upset me by posting a concert review that nobody had asked for, nor was relevant to the discussion at hand as a means of involving yourself in a disagreement that doesn't involve you is emblematic of the sophomoric behavior that I spoke out against in response to ITZ. I can't even begin to imagine what the thought process that went on in your head here, "This guy has an opinion that I disagree with! When has discourse ever resolved anything though? I know, I'll just try and make the guy who gets all serious on VIDEO GAME FORUMS mad, that will teach him a lesson about having an opinion that's not mine!"
I'm not sure how to actually speak baboon, but I hope I managed to still effectively communicate the nonsensical approach you seem to have taken to the situation[/b]
Just for fun, I'll include Madonna's MDNA tour review, which sounded like it was marred by a ton of tech problems. 3 out of 5 stars. The Guardian Review - MDNA
I can't say that I understand the Godel Metric, the theorems and math involved are way beyond my level of comprehension. However, there is one math concept I do know...comparing numbers! Janet's 4 > Gaga's 3, and Janet's 4 > Kylie's 3 too! (Can somebody double check this please? After spending so long writing this damn thing, I would love nothing more than to see it confirmed by a third party, tbh). No ifs, ands, or buts about it, the critic you endorsed, a senior employee of the well-respected newspaper you hold in high regard has spoken. Every day, millions of readers are able to access The Guardian's content free of charge and to educate themselves on the wide range of artists and sounds out there. As more people realize the absolute mediocrity of your faves (Gaga sales drop between albums, anyone?), and the gays migrate to a new diva, it's almost as if we possessed some kind of natural instincts, like knowing when it's time to dissociate oneself from a former fave. (It's sort of like whales, they all know to migrate to warmer waters, in a similar manner gays just know when it's to move away from a girl who's about to go flop hard and find one who's about to set the charts on fire). Not before long, your fave flops will be entirely forgotten by society, and the Demi Lovatos of the world will ensure your faves won't ever have a seat on a talent competition. Your flops' lasting contribution to society will be some question on Trivial Pursuit that will stump everyone. All this will all be brought about by your own magazine fostering awareness of the pedestrian qualities and basic struggles of the women you call Queen without irony.
Tick....tock..... =D
Just for fun, I'll include Madonna's MDNA tour review, which sounded like it was marred by a ton of tech problems. 3 out of 5 stars. The Guardian Review - MDNA
I can't say that I understand the Godel Metric, the theorems and math involved are way beyond my level of comprehension. However, there is one math concept I do know...comparing numbers! Janet's 4 > Gaga's 3, and Janet's 4 > Kylie's 3 too! (Can somebody double check this please? After spending so long writing this damn thing, I would love nothing more than to see it confirmed by a third party, tbh). No ifs, ands, or buts about it, the critic you endorsed, a senior employee of the well-respected newspaper you hold in high regard has spoken. Every day, millions of readers are able to access The Guardian's content free of charge and to educate themselves on the wide range of artists and sounds out there. As more people realize the absolute mediocrity of your faves (Gaga sales drop between albums, anyone?), and the gays migrate to a new diva, it's almost as if we possessed some kind of natural instincts, like knowing when it's time to dissociate oneself from a former fave. (It's sort of like whales, they all know to migrate to warmer waters, in a similar manner gays just know when it's to move away from a girl who's about to go flop hard and find one who's about to set the charts on fire). Not before long, your fave flops will be entirely forgotten by society, and the Demi Lovatos of the world will ensure your faves won't ever have a seat on a talent competition. Your flops' lasting contribution to society will be some question on Trivial Pursuit that will stump everyone. All this will all be brought about by your own magazine fostering awareness of the pedestrian qualities and basic struggles of the women you call Queen without irony.
Tick....tock..... =D
How cute, the flop poster pledges allegiance to the flop newspaper. It's got the second lowest circulation of the eleven dailies in Britain, having #DROPPEDT from 403k to 217k in daily circulation, costing the magazine £100,000 every day. Although I'm not quite sure I'm ready to see it go yet, as one of the reviewers for the culture section seems to possess an abundance of unquestionably good taste. I think it's important the newspaper stay in business so that his reviews continue to reach a large audience. Thankfully, The Guardian has a very large online presence which receives heavy traffic, so these reviews could potentially be viewed by as many as 4 million readers each day (67 million unique visitors a month and growing, 1/3 of all visitors are American). Despite generating a sizable online presence, the magazine insists on keeping the site's content free, and has had to let employees go on two occasions in addition to raising the price of the printed newspaper. I'm delighted to report that the Head Pop Critic and Spiller of Truth Tea, Alexis Petridis, is still employed and spilling the tea as of today!
When you tried to shade Janet, you were actually taking a quote out of context from a review that was actually quite positive overall. I'm not sure which scenario makes you look more foolish: thinking that I would not go digging for receipts when you were well-aware that your quote didn't hold up, or that you somehow happened upon just this little snippet and quoted it without doing your own homework. You're embarrassing yourself, dude. But don't go anywhere yet, because the fun's just getting started!
As the Head Pop Critic for The Guardian, Alexis Petridis happened to review not only Gaga's "The Fame", Kylie's "X", but also Madonna's MDNA tour that Roy pulled a quote from. Since you sought out the opinion of Mr. Petridis in particular, among the hundreds of options, and you stated that The Guardian is one of the world's best magazines in no uncertain terms, I guess I'll go with your reviewer/magazine. If I were to pick my own, magazine/reviewer, there would be too many problems caused by having more than one critic, so I'm just going to hold us both to the one you pulled that quote from. Since he's employed by one of the world's best magazines, he must have a pretty damn good idea what he's talking talking.
This is Head Pop Music Critic for The Guardian, Alexis Petridis. He is unhappy because he just learned that Godelsmetric used Alexis' words for evil-doing.
Janet Jackson: Number Ones World Tour -- 4 out of 5 stars. I won't quote him, elaborate further, or anything like that. Your excerpt in no way misrepresented the content of the review. Well done.
Your fave Lady Gaga: The Fame -- 3 out of 5 stars. Here are some my favorite excerpts from his review, although I had to make some really difficult decisions to cut stuff out because there so many gems in his review.
Hopefully you're able to tell that the review above is parodying your own post, in which your desire to troll/instigate drama led you to find an excerpt from a review which reads like a harsh critique of Janet's concert when the frame of reference is not there. Selectively choosing what to quote or ignore for the purpose of creating a narrative to fit your "shading" needs is pretty pathetic. If you're ever going to post receipts again, make sure they're not being printed straight out of your ass, okay?
Your other fave: Kylie Minogue - X: 3 out of 5 stars. The Guardian Review - X If you're going to post a review, this is how it should be done. Either link it/include all the text or don't even bother. However, attempting to upset me by posting a concert review that nobody had asked for, nor was relevant to the discussion at hand as a means of involving yourself in a disagreement that doesn't involve you is emblematic of the sophomoric behavior that I spoke out against in response to ITZ. I can't even begin to imagine what the thought process that went on in your head here, "This guy has an opinion that I disagree with! When has discourse ever resolved anything though? I know, I'll just try and make the guy who gets all serious on VIDEO GAME FORUMS mad, that will teach him a lesson about having an opinion that's not mine!"I'm not sure how to actually speak baboon, but I hope I managed to still effectively communicate the nonsensical approach you seem to have taken to the situation[/b]
Just for fun, I'll include Madonna's MDNA tour review, which sounded like it was marred by a ton of tech problems. 3 out of 5 stars. The Guardian Review - MDNA
I can't say that I understand the Godel Metric, the theorems and math involved are way beyond my level of comprehension. However, there is one math concept I do know...comparing numbers! Janet's 4 > Gaga's 3, and Janet's 4 > Kylie's 3 too! (Can somebody double check this please? After spending so long writing this damn thing, I would love nothing more than to see it confirmed by a third party, tbh). No ifs, ands, or buts about it, the critic you endorsed, a senior employee of the well-respected newspaper you hold in high regard has spoken. Every day, millions of readers are able to access The Guardian's content free of charge and to educate themselves on the wide range of artists and sounds out there. As more people realize the absolute mediocrity of your faves (Gaga sales drop between albums, anyone?), and the gays migrate to a new diva, it's almost as if we possessed some kind of natural instincts, like knowing when it's time to dissociate oneself from a former fave. (It's sort of like whales, they all know to migrate to warmer waters, in a similar manner gays just know when it's to move away from a girl who's about to go flop hard and find one who's about to set the charts on fire). Not before long, your fave flops will be entirely forgotten by society, and the Demi Lovatos of the world will ensure your faves won't ever have a seat on a talent competition. Your flops' lasting contribution to society will be some question on Trivial Pursuit that will stump everyone. All this will all be brought about by your own magazine fostering awareness of the pedestrian qualities and basic struggles of the women you call Queen without irony.
Tick....tock..... =D
Jesus, I feel bad that the amount of time it takes you to type this stuff in no way reflects on the amount I care about reading and responding it.
Since you showed interest, Icicle, the Gödel Metric is a solution to Einstein's field equations that describes a universe that allows for time travel.
It's a shame our universe isn't like that or you could travel back to a time when Janet was a relevant artist. Then maybe you wouldn't be so pressed and aggressive whenever anyone spills the tea.
It's a shame our universe isn't like that or you could travel back to a time when Janet was a relevant artist. Then maybe you wouldn't be so pressed and aggressive whenever anyone spills the tea.
Sis I'm not here for an essay writing contest. Especially against someone who made an imaginary godelsmetric out of straw and then stamped on it while foaming at the mouth and beating at her chest. IDK hew Icicle thinks she's dragging but virtually none of the opinions she's criticising in her post resemble any I hold.
Christopher
Member
- Call Me Maybe
- Pay Phone
- Wide Awake
- Somebody That I Use to Know
- Lights
- Where Have You Been
- Blow Me One Last Kiss
- Whistle
- Titanium
- Scream
Wouldn't exactly call that master shade. In fact, Seth MacFarlane does not even have room to talk:
Pre-ordered this http://www.play.com/Music/CD/4-/30679631/0/Devotion/ListingDetails.html
August 20 is far away
August 20 is far away
Wouldn't exactly call that master shade. In fact, Seth MacFarlane does not even have room to talk:
Whatever Ted is slaying while Perra flops. And like I said are there lies? Nope.
lol, as weird as this may sound I actually like Seth's singing voice. Musical numbers on Family Guy are better for it.
Exactly. Icicle will read y'all a thesis on your floptitude. I just leave Janet alone.
this is why I dont drag Janet, I dont want essays directed at Gaga
Exactly. Icicle will read y'all a thesis on your floptitude. I just leave Janet alone.
Tedium is a powerful disincentive, I agree.
7echnicolor
Member
Really LTTP but I've become.. as Koodo puts it: #aWARE.
Gosh Jessie Ware is just so GOOD. I need to hear 'Devotion' now, I don't want to wait until August 20th.
Someone in here said she reminded them of Sade right? Guess I should check out her stuff too.
Gosh Jessie Ware is just so GOOD. I need to hear 'Devotion' now, I don't want to wait until August 20th.
Someone in here said she reminded them of Sade right? Guess I should check out her stuff too.
Please do. Sade is great.
Nothing in that essay Icicle wrote addressed the central point in that paragraph godel posted:
The point was not that Janet had a bad concert. It was that Janet was irrelevant, and her choices for her concert serve as a reminder of what she used to be.
To go digging for the receipts in order to prove that the review said the concert was actually totally awesome misses the point entirely and is ultimately a distraction.
But it was cute.
7echnicolor
Member
I'm listening to 'Lovers Rock' right now, I'm loving it. What are your favorite albums by her?
Gerl THANKYOU. At last somebody who assumes I am not so stupid as to try and pass off a GOOD review as a BAD one.
Promise reigns supreme. It has "Sweetest Taboo" and "Is It a Crime". IMO two staples of the smooth jazz genre. Turn on any jazz station and you'll hear one of those at least once.
August 20th is International aWAREness Day.
I trust y'all have also listened to Strangest Feeling. It won't be on the album, but it's excellent.
Nemesis_
Member
this is why I dont drag Janet, I dont want essays directed at Gaga
CTRL + F - GAGA
We got a SENTENCE sis
A huge fucking sentence. What a CERTIFIED MESS.
<+)O Robido O(+>
Member
Yeah, it could just be me but she definitely reminds me of Sade, even though she says she gets her inspiration from Whitney Houston.
Leona Lewis
Banned
I See You.
Icicle melting all over this page TBH, the desperate tea an avalanche of hilarity.
At least I have the common decency to recognize my fave's recent history of floppedt, though it's not so bad considering recent orgasmic impressions ensure an album heralding the chart-topping return of SLAYONA. Janet, though...don't know what her fans have to look forward to other than more Minnie Mouse vocals.
#glassheart2012worlddomination
Sade is just too classy, too flawless to respond or even care about such a ridiculous and pathetic statement.
<+)O Robido O(+>
Member
Jessie Ware does not remind me of Sade because I don't fall asleep when listening to Jessie Ware.
Jessie Ware does not remind me of Sade because I don't fall asleep when listening to Jessie Ware.
You shading Sade? In favor of #WARE?
lord.
Crumpet Trumpet
Banned
Does Beyonce have an actual beehive glued to her head? I can't even.
- Status