All that power and can't produce a top 10 hit. I'm not seething at all that my fave is an actual pop star. Yours can have meaningless awards if she wants them. Clearly she has no actual power or impact.
Oh sweetie.
I feel bad for #VEINY. All those hits she pumps out every year, and yet outside of the radio and iTunes charts nobody gives two shits about her as a musical presence. Beyonce hasn't had a top 10 hit since 2009 and she's still being relegated to labels such as "Queen of Pop," "Most Powerful Woman," and "Most Beautiful Musician." Meanwhile she gets a BILLBOARD award for "artist of the decade" even though at the time she didn't even HAVE a top 10 hit on Billboard, and was invited to the SUPERBOWL to perform in front of billions of people even though she didn't have a hit on the radio even then.
MEANWHILE your ratchet fave, who spends all of her time pumping out songs on a constant and treating her Instagram account like her very own personal drug cartel, can't seem to muster any recognition or RECALL from the mainstream because they seem to have relegated her to be "that lady on the radio." Maybe the lesson here is that having top 10 hits left and right don't really mean much if you don't have an actual talent, a niche, or a unique APPEAL to the masses.
Beyonce's done pretty damn well chart-wise through her career, but that's not what makes her what she is now. If you think that not having the same number of certifications as Rihanna is a hinderance to her in the big picture then you're deluding yourself, and you need to get your shit straight.
If you go up to any random sample of people anywhere in the world and told them who they thought was more successful, had more hits, or has had a more stable career, they will UNEQUIVOCALLY tell you it's Beyonce. Why?? Because like The Black Eyed Peas and Pitbull, nobody gives two shits about Rihanna as a person regardless of how many disposable songs she puts out on radio. Your idea of "IMPACT" is really just your mind convincing you that "top 10 hits = more successful." It means you've done better on the charts, but that's just one side of the musical cube. Articles I've seen that have proclaimed Rihanna as the record-holding performer have almost proclaimed them with a hint of surprise; just like those articles that announced all those Black Eyed Peas songs that got sold on iTunes. Why were these facts surprising?? Because people were fucking EMBARASSED for themselves.
So the next time you try to come for someone who was and still is the main TEMPLATE that your scraggly fave whorishly attempts to emulate on a constant, keep in mind that your bitch is sorely behind. We've learned now that top 10 hits (or a lack thereof) say absolutely SHIT about a musician if he or she doesn't have impact across a great deal of other categories. People constantly have distorted ideas of chart performance (just like people assume Bad Romance was number one on Billboard for like a year... it wasn't). But when someone is really fucking famous, it's observed much more easily because that person is EVERYWHERE. Your fave should probably work on carving out a plan for herself that can finally put those diamond certifications to use. Coz right now she's that long-lost Black Eyed Peas member who has thousands of hits under her belt that no one in the real world can probably recall, and past those fifteen minute increments on the radio might as well go off to pasture on a goat ranch and nobody would pay no mind.
All this nerve coming for a superior artist with real pop cultural impact. It'd be funnier if it wasn't so trite and embarassing. Keep your hits; I'm sure you'll need those statistics to remind people that this bitch existed at some point once everyone moves on to another half-naked, half-baked goat species that rounds up endless certifications with nothing to show for it.