20 years later and XBox has gone backwards not forwards. 360 era was incredible, since then XBox has been dreadful with 1st party.Exactly, $67 billion later and they are still here 20 years on.
They are already a third party
Well i just hope that hw stil be an option in 20 years. If i can keep playing on local pc and steam I don't care what ms buys.Popularity can flip quite fast, look at the Wii U, or even the first half of the 360 vs PS3, MS had a very good momentum with Halo 3 Gears, Mass Effect, Bioshock, GTA IV DLC, COD marketing.
MS will buy enough to make them the main console platform. Sony will have to work very hard coming up with competitive ips that Zenimax, Activision have, and surely more third party games becoming exclusive or Xbox being the best place to buy them on like COD will be if this 10 year deal happens. Of course MS could make a mess of these acquisitions.
MS are trying to position themselves as the main download and streaming platform for gaming long term. They have the servers and the clout so this console platform paradigm is on it's end phase. The new generation of gamers will be more into renting/subbing/streaming games.
I see Sony gaming becoming third party or part of bigger corp like Apple. Not sure when this will be 15-30 years? Is just seems like you'll own nothing and be a linked to a mega corp of which the name doesn't matter, MS Apple, Tencent. Hardware will be niche legacy type.
If they didn't get ABK, I would subscribe to this.
With, nah. They're cornering the market and wanting to funnel people into their Netflix of Gaming™
You will need a vehicle to for that. Once the vehicles are irrelevant, you stand on top with the cloud only infrastructure. Owning most of the once 3rd party IPs along the way.
Yep.
Well, that was fast...In other words, they're already third party. If you buy a digital Xbox game, you can use the Xbox app on PC to play it on your PC. They have stuff on PS and Nintendo. The Xbox console itself is just another access point and icon of the brand you wouldn't want to take away. It's there so no one will say "they went third party!" even though they already did. Hell, the CEO recently said he hates exclusive games.
Still doesn't make them 3rd party - even with select titles on rival platforms. The bulk of their games exist primarily in their ecosystem. Microsoft has already stated they have no to go 3rd party. Nadella might not be a fan of exclusives but he understands the nature of the beast. Exclusives are a necessity on this business to persuade future and current console owners to the ecosystem.Gaming studios buy other gaming studios all the time, even though their goal is not to sell silicone. I see MS having a console just as an easy option to access Gamepass. Gamepass is already on PC, and MS already publishes games third party. They spent 70bn to bolster their software portfolio. From their vantage point, Xbox consoles could have been the main force behind accessing it, but it doesn't have to be.
In other words, they're already third party. If you buy a digital Xbox game, you can use the Xbox app on PC to play it on your PC. They have stuff on PS and Nintendo. The Xbox console itself is just another access point and icon of the brand you wouldn't want to take away. It's there so no one will say "they went third party!" even though they already did. Hell, the CEO recently said he hates exclusive games.
This is fear mongering. Microsoft is not out to own everything. They're just done with not being able to compete with the dominant market leader. Now they are.Monopolies. Are. Bad.
Corporations. Are. Not. Your. Friend.
I'm not sure what fuck-wits managed to get through 11th/12th grade Economics 101 and not understand these basic concepts. Once Microsoft owns everything, or at least enough of everything, they will control the market and set prices. There will be no or minimal competition, which will mean no motivation for MS to keep prices low or innovate or provide good services/goods.
Still doesn't make them 3rd party - even with select titles on rival platforms. The bulk of their games exist primarily in their ecosystem. Microsoft has already stated they have no to go 3rd party. Nadella might not be a fan of exclusives but he understands the nature of the beast. Exclusives are a necessity on this business to persuade future and current console owners to the ecosystem.
Consoles might not always be a thing but, imo, exclusives will be. Its literally what differentiates each of the Big 3.
Yes, they want to be dominant by BUYING everything, thereby reducing free market competition, which is what a monopoly does. They've given up on trying to be dominant by being creative and providing engaging, high quality products and services, which is how Sony and Nintendo got to where they are. MS is trying to shortcut their way to success, which is going to harm consumers.This is fear mongering. Microsoft is not out to own everything. They're just done with not being able to compete with the dominant market leader. Now they are.
You buy a massive publisher like ABK to sell subscriptions**I don't think they will at all. Like others have said, you would likely buy a massive publisher like ABK to sell systems.
Netflix is very profitable, and if you look at the math of the streaming deal, the pool of money generated every month is massive and very sustainable. It's a bit like the gym, you have people paying and they don't even go there. People will pay for a full year, just to see a 24 episode series. no matter how you slice it it's no wonder they manage to buy and produce more content than a TV channel even if they mismanage the funds, and butcher the quality control. If anything the issue with streaming apps, is that most of them write checks and then wait for content to be delivered. It's basically the equivalent of betting on horses when they should be breeding and training the horses.Just look at streaming services. Disney+ is bleeding money, Netflix keeps raising prices, HBO Max had to combine with Doscovery, other smaller services are irrelevant.
False. Show receipts where they are trying to buy everything. I'll wait....Yes, they want to be dominant by BUYING everything, thereby reducing free market competition, which is what a monopoly does. They've given up on trying to be dominant by being creative and providing engaging, high quality products and services, which is how Sony and Nintendo got to where they are. MS is trying to shortcut their way to success, which is going to harm consumers.
???As a nintendo exclusive second party partner..
Screwing over sony BIG ASS TIME
As long as they also give the option to buy those games physically on PS like they've done with the quake releases I'd be fine with that. Would never sub and would likely get anything that used to be a third party ip when it was $20 or lower but I'd give them money for elder scrolls, doom, etcI think the closest that might (but still probably unlikely to) happen is that if they don't see a shift to Xbox consoles for Gamepass, they may create a first party only offering on PlayStation and Nintendo eventually, but even then they'd keep their console business to keep Sony on their toes.
They didn't have no choice. They could have stayed where they were with Xbox one and just been a profitable smaller piece of the pie, probably larger than that since they wouldn't have the initial muck ups of the Xbox One launch and would now have Gamepass and their studios they got in 2018 plus the gradual build they could still do. Look how Sony built up after the disastrous ps3 launchFalse. Show receipts where they are trying to buy everything. I'll wait....
Nothing? Ok...
This merger has gone through its course, quite thoroughly I might add. Will this merger hurt Sony? Probably. Will it hurt consumers? It's been judged around the entire planet that it does not hurt consumers at all. The bulk of Sony's studios were acquired. 80% of their studios were bought.
At this point, it's been shown why Microsoft went this route. They would never be able to compete with Sony playing by Sony's playbook. The risks are too high by building studios from the ground up. The ONLY option they had was to purchase publishers to guarantee that those titles don't skip Xbox. Starfield was the last straw. Sony tried to purchase starfield and make it exclusive. Microsoft bought the farm instead.
ABK strong armed Microsoft to give them a higher percentage of the profits for putting CoD on Xbox consoles because of Sony's dominant roll in the market. The shit had to end somewhere. Now it has. And the market and consumers are better off for it.
You may not agree with the change of the status quo. That's cool. You don't have to like it. It changes nothing though. Furthermore, it's completely legal for Microsoft to do what their doing to strengthen their position in the market. Sony does the same thing. Have been for decades. Are you seriously going to begrudge Microsoft for playing the same game with more money?
I personally can't blame them. They're doing what they need to, to stay relevant and financially viable in the market. We all benefit from this merger. It is what it is
And spend the r&d so valve can make all the money. If Microsoft exits they will release the small studios and sell the big ones. There is zero point in not making a lot of money as a 3rd party.If anything the next Xbox will be a fixed spec Windows PC with a controller UI.
Just for the recordFalse. Show receipts where they are trying to buy everything. I'll wait....
Nothing? Ok...
This merger has gone through its course, quite thoroughly I might add. Will this merger hurt Sony? Probably. Will it hurt consumers? It's been judged around the entire planet that it does not hurt consumers at all. The bulk of Sony's studios were acquired. 80% of their studios were bought.
At this point, it's been shown why Microsoft went this route. They would never be able to compete with Sony playing by Sony's playbook. The risks are too high by building studios from the ground up. The ONLY option they had was to purchase publishers to guarantee that those titles don't skip Xbox. Starfield was the last straw. Sony tried to purchase starfield and make it exclusive. Microsoft bought the farm instead.
ABK strong armed Microsoft to give them a higher percentage of the profits for putting CoD on Xbox consoles because of Sony's dominant roll in the market. The shit had to end somewhere. Now it has. And the market and consumers are better off for it.
You may not agree with the change of the status quo. That's cool. You don't have to like it. It changes nothing though. Furthermore, it's completely legal for Microsoft to do what their doing to strengthen their position in the market. Sony does the same thing. Have been for decades. Are you seriously going to begrudge Microsoft for playing the same game with more money?
I personally can't blame them. They're doing what they need to, to stay relevant and financially viable in the market. We all benefit from this merger. It is what it is