Did he say ''...behind the blue screen...you was totally out of control.''
He also used the word "bragadocious" at one point.
Did he say ''...behind the blue screen...you was totally out of control.''
TBH, it's pretty shocking for us Americans too. 2012 was fucking nuts, but by the general, you had two sane candidates running and could have actual debates on issues.I don't know if there is some sort of culture shock/ cultural divide-thing going on here, but european politics are not like this.
She was well composed and actually ansered the questions she was given, she was pretty great imo.
Trump literally spent a sentence or two rambling some incoherent nonsense as a direct answer to any given question and then went on multiple tangents to:
-accuse Clinton/Obama of being responsible for something
-gloating about his wealth/company/income
-telling his story of everything moving to China/Mexico
-interrupting her
-rinse and repeat
Like, this is has been a truly poor showing so far. I don't see how anyone could call this halfway decent at all. It was truly terrible by any standard.
I'm almost afraid to watch any further.
Last two weeks. Are you talking post debate polls?538 saying there's a Trump surge? Where's the proof?
Trump totally does that thing where he clumsily reuses words he just heard.
i just watched the whole thing, and Trump saying "the nuclear" and "the cyber" must be among the weirdest stuff i've heard in a while.
Oh I doubt that too. I'm just curious if he'I'll even walk away from last night thinking "huh maybe I should do some prep for the next two".
Very well put !He did no debate prep. He kind of mocked the idea honestly.
All his experiences in previous debates he was on stage with between like 5 and 15 people, which meant he was never too far from someone screaming to get a word in and rescue him from having to expand on anything.
His press and rally appearances are either done by teleprompter or are feverish free association things where he randomly jumps from topic to topic.
Essentially, he was lazy, didn't do his homework (and Clinton did and hit him on this) and went up against someone who has debated 1v1 against orators like Barack Obama and Bernie Sanders on multiple occasions.
The only question now is if he tries to right the ship or goes full sulk and declines to debate again.
I don't understand why interviewers and the like never say to Donal "Okay Donald, you have just said a lot of words but none of them are an answer to the question I just asked. Could you please answer my question?"
Or something to that effect. Is it because they want to seem neutral? They would be seen as bullying Donald if they try to press him for a real answer?
538 saying there's a Trump surge? Where's the proof?
i just watched the whole thing, and Trump saying "the nuclear" and "the cyber" must be among the weirdest stuff i've heard in a while.
SANGER: We're under regular cyberattack. Would you use cyberweapons before you used military force?
TRUMP: Cyber is absolutely a thing of the future and the present. Look, we're under cyberattack, forget about them. And we don't even know where it's coming from.
SANGER: Some days we do, and some days we don't.
TRUMP: Because we're obsolete. Right now, Russia and China in particular and other places.
SANGER: Would you support the United States' not only developing as we are but fielding cyberweapons as an alternative?
TRUMP: Yes. I am a fan of the future, and cyber is the future.
He's said "the nuclear" before, it's weird. He had a weird rambling quote a while back that was something like "You know what, these countries, they're going to advance. And you know what that means? They're going to get the ultimate. You know what the ultimate is, right? AKA The nuclear. And once you get the nuclear, you're at the ultimate."
She was collected but didn't feel likable. For me she lacked some more emotional response to some of the bullshit Donald was spewing on things like race.
So we have to get very , very tough on cyber and cyber warfare. It is - - it is a huge problem . I have a son. He 's 10 years old . He has computers. He is so good with these computers, it ' s unbelievable. The security aspect of cyber is very , very tough . And maybe it ' s hardly doable.
I'm still in disbelief
So we have to get very , very tough on cyber and cyber warfare. It is - - it is a huge problem . I have a son. He 's 10 years old . He has computers. He is so good with these computers, it ' s unbelievable. The security aspect of cyber is very , very tough . And maybe it ' s hardly doable.
I'm still in disbelief
At a rally? He'd throw you out. Outside of a speech? He'd walk right past you. In a debate? Well, he'll just talk over you and get really prissy with "did you ask me a question? Did you ask me a question?" shit and doesn't really care if he answers your question or not.
This particular moderator was especially weak, but even worse one of the conditions Donald Trump fought very hard for was no fact checking during the debate. Normally, moderators will fact check and call a candidate out on inaccuracies. Donald Trump basically wouldn't appear unless they agreed to not fact check, which is why Clinton made a point early in the debate to point out that she had a website that would do real-time fact checking as the debate went on (and other third party sources did so too).
the part where he said "the nuclear are the biggest problem this world has" switching - within 5 seconds to - "but Russia has much more modern nuclear weapons, we need to keep up", essentially promoting another nuclear arms race, imho, was another gem.
I think he should have been a lot more aggressive. First of all, there's a lot legitimately there to be aggressive about, but also if he's not that he falls apart. Without it, in the resulting vacuum are his opinion on things, which are senseless, and the gigantic holes/weaknesses in his past and character. He has to make the story about how much she and the establishment suck and how visionary he is at recognizing exactly the why and how, otherwise it's a disaster because he is what he is.
I really can't believe how tone-deaf Trump was on race and law. I mean, its just almost unreal how undisguised his racism is. Doesn't even have any nuance or depth to his positions, really crazy. I guess I shouldn't be surprised but it's just so alienating, it's nuts that he's not using the debate to try to clarify any of the perceptions of himself. Anyway, fine, let him look like a giant racist asshole. Guess its better he's wearing it on his sleeve, in a way.
I thought he was saying "big league", but it was "bigly"? lol
Seriously, he had so many outrageous stances in this debate, but this one might take the cake. His stance on police-minority relations? 100% on the side of the police, bragged about the fraternal order of police endorsement, and his solution is to let cops randomly frisk black people without cause nation wide. Who cares if a state court ruled it unconstitutional? He'll appeal and win. After all, it can go all the way to the supreme court, and the president will get to pick who makes the deciding vote.
Fucking disgusting.
Close, that's better English than he used.Did he say ''...behind the blue screen...you was totally out of control.''
That one is fucking weird, and I can't beleive it was said in a national debate. This one is strange too:So we have to get very , very tough on cyber and cyber warfare. It is - - it is a huge problem . I have a son. He 's 10 years old . He has computers. He is so good with these computers, it ' s unbelievable. The security aspect of cyber is very , very tough . And maybe it ' s hardly doable.
I'm still in disbelief
TRUMP: It does not show that. The record shows that I'm right. When I did an interview with Howard Stern, very lightly, first time anybody's asked me, I said, "who knows." Essentially. I then did an interview with Neil Cavuto. I had numerous conversations with Sean Hannity at Fox, and he called me the other day and I spoke to him about it. He said, "you were, totally," because he was for the war.
HOLT: Why
TRUMP: And that is before the war started. Sean Hannity said very strongly, to me and other people, he's willing to say, but nobody wants to call him, I was against the war. He said, "You used to have fights with me," because Sean was in favor of the war. And I understand that side also. Not very much, because we should have never been there, but nobody called Sean Hannity. And then they did an article in a major magazine, shortly after the war started. I think in '04. But they did an article, which had me totally against the war in Iraq. And one of your compatriots said, you know, whether it was before or right after, Trump was, because if you read this article, there's no doubt. But if somebody, and I'll ask the press, if somebody would call up Sean Hannity, this was before the war started. He and I used to have arguments about the war. I said it's a terrible and a stupid thing. It's going to destabilize the Middle East. And that exactly what this's done.
Any time he talks about Cyber, it's hilarious.
It really needs to be law to require major party candidates to attend all three debates to remain on the ballot.He did no debate prep. He kind of mocked the idea honestly.
All his experiences in previous debates he was on stage with between like 5 and 15 people, which meant he was never too far from someone screaming to get a word in and rescue him from having to expand on anything.
His press and rally appearances are either done by teleprompter or are feverish free association things where he randomly jumps from topic to topic.
Essentially, he was lazy, didn't do his homework (and Clinton did and hit him on this) and went up against someone who has debated 1v1 against orators like Barack Obama and Bernie Sanders on multiple occasions.
The only question now is if he tries to right the ship or goes full sulk and declines to debate again.
I heard "bigly" lolI totally heard big league.
I really can't believe how tone-deaf Trump was on race and law. I mean, its just almost unreal how undisguised his racism is. Doesn't even have any nuance or depth to his positions, really crazy. I guess I shouldn't be surprised but it's just so alienating, it's nuts that he's not using the debate to try to clarify any of the perceptions of himself. Anyway, fine, let him look like a giant racist asshole. Guess its better he's wearing it on his sleeve, in a way.
Donald Trump was, yet again, the slow kid who thought he could bluster through the book report for the book he didn't read. He didn't even read the cliff-notes. He just glanced at the title and said, "Killing birds? How hard can it be?"
Can you imagine this clown discussing with world leaders or talking at the UN?
Jimmy Carter actually skipped a debate in 1980 because he didn't want to debate the third-party candidate John Anderson (who was present along with Reagan). They had the debate without him instead.It really needs to be law to require major party candidates to attend all three debates to remain on the ballot.
We didn't need this law before, because until Trump no one was stupid enough to threaten not doing a debate.
#TrumpWon is trending right now on Twitter. Seems like cronies like Cruz, Gingrich, and Palmer Luckey's white supremacists are trying to convince everyone Trump did well through meme magic.
I think he was right in that particular instance. No amount of debate prep is going to allow him to suddenly become knowledgeable and experienced in all the areas he is so sorely lacking.He did no debate prep. He kind of mocked the idea honestly.
Trumps still your man if you are part of the alt right. Those dudes are strapped in.#TrumpWon is trending right now on Twitter. Seems like cronies like Cruz, Gingrich, and Palmer Luckey's white supremacists are trying to convince everyone Trump did well through meme magic.
I think he was right in that particular instance. No amount of debate prep is going to allow him to suddenly become knowledgeable and experienced in all the areas he is so sorely lacking.
He's incapable of winning a traditional debate so make sure it isn't a traditional debate. Instead make it just another platform to trumpet your message.