RPGCrazied
Member
All he has to do is bring up his anti gay laws he dabbled in, even said he could convert gay people straight via therapy. He is a psycho.
Rehearsed, staid, playing to expectations.I just heard the "too presidential " complaint
What the fuck? What does that even mean?
Can we expect Tim Kaine to do well against Pence?
Yes but the VP debate isn't much of a thing. Maybe an extra stomp on the head to Trump's campaign.Can we expect Tim Kaine to do well against Pence?
Can we expect Tim Kaine to do well against Pence?
Since Pence has to play defense for Trump alongside stanning for republican policy, I think Kaine has the advantage coming in.
I would separate 'elite' from 'establishment.' He's in the 1%, but in the manner of fungus that grows in the corners where the real establishment can't be bothered to reach. There's a world of difference between sizeable, independent, private means, and having the power to actually influence the public realm. This is on the level of banks, or entire industries. Trump is nowhere near that level socially or materially.The key here being that Trump is far more a part of the "elite establishment" than Clinton ever was
Rehearsed, staid, playing to expectations.
Y'all do yourselves a disservice by assuming Trump people want a candidate who looks like he belongs in office. They are voting for him precisely because he does not look or act presidential. News outlets that focus on how presidential he looks are speculating on his appeal to moderates and undecideds who for whatever reason are seriously considering Trump as an option. Despite this, a large portion of his appeal is that he is a political outsider, and as an outsider he has no need to fit the presidential mold. To folks this resonates with, "too presidential" is indeed a valid criticism. It is too normal, status quo, and they choose to vote against that.
Awesome. I'm glad you actually took the time to educate yourself. While I've not been the biggest fan of Hillary for a while now (voted Obama, vote Bernie), she definitely has the kind of experience that would suggest she could easily be a decent president.I'm not defending the opinions of Trump supporters... Hell, I've been planning to vote for Clinton after having watching the DNC... The DNC sold me because it gave a history of what Hillary Clinton has done and showed exactly why she would be a great President. As someone in their thirties, my knowledge of Hillary Clinton amounted to having been a child and teenager during Bill's Presidency in the '90s and knowing about her time as Senator of New York and Secretary of State. To hear of what progressive things Hillary Clinton did in the '60s, '70s, and '80s was better at convincing me that she was the best choice over most of the arguments I've heard outside of the DNC which still amount to "She's not Donald Trump!"
Didn't she only mention it once where as Trump brought up his properties over and over and over.To be fair, Hillary pushed her book hard last night.
Who talks like that about their own wife or mother? Absolutely absurd.
400lbs big? Hmm...
Crossposting, but wow.
Yes but the VP debate isn't much of a thing. Maybe an extra stomp on the head to Trump's campaign.
UK citizen here, just finished watching the debate, the first of any US presidential race I've watched in my life.
Just wanted to say that I thought the moderator was particularly weak, there was lots of shouting, interruptions and non-answers (from Trump mostly) that went completely unchecked. As such there was very little actual 'debate' and a lot of grandstanding. I thought Trump did poorly, but I could totally see his more vehement supporters thinking he won comfortably.
Is the moderation usually this lax? And can we expect stronger moderation in the next debates?
I love the denial coming from 4chan/Redditt, if anything Donald won the troll vote all right, I dont visit 4chan or Redditt, but I really want to visit that webpage if Clinton wins just to see the meltdowns and Salt that is going to generate from those delusional Trump fans.
Hell, he even had enough time to lay out the argument that he hasn't gone fully nasty on her, yet her campaign has wasted (200 millions, I think he said?) lot of money to slight him. Basically putting himself above it, and also preparing the field with his tactic of - "I only allow myself to go fully bananas on you, because you offended me first". Which proved to be very successful in the Republican nomination race.
I haven't checked the post-debates news, but are we sure that the "good temperament" comment really worked against him (undecided wise)? Because even though Hillary handled it well, I think he seeded something very nasty and potentially useful for him in the next debates.
I was hoping the moderator would put a leash on Trump being Trump and not let him get away with rambling nonsense, but that didn't really happen.
Quoting myself from earlier in the thread because I couldn't find an answer, and asked it when most of America was asleep.
I was hoping the moderator would put a leash on Trump being Trump and not let him get away with rambling nonsense, but that didn't really happen.
It's the same motivation that allowed Trump to soak up many Bernie supporters. People are frustrated by a bureaucracy they feel does not work for them, watching the wheels of government turn without getting anywhere. I couldn't tell you why they feel Trump is the person who can fix this other than he's not a politician (which to me sounds a bit like saying since medical errors are so common, maybe we should get a baker to do some appendectomies in place of a surgeon or two).That's not a reasonable appeal to reasonable people, though.
Sure was fun to watch last time though
Really though all Kaine needs to do is bring up the horrible shit Pence has done or tried to do. The guy wants the government to pay for conversion therapy, there's no defending shit like that.
In hindsight the moderator letting Trump ramble on is what helped Trump lose in my opinion
It's gonna be interesting that's for damn sure.Also Pence seems to generally not be on the same page as Trump, so I wonder if making some of the issues about Trump will work in Kaine's favor.
Either Pence looks like a scumbag for agreeing with Trump, or Pence pisses off Trump's base by disagreeing.
Can we expect Tim Kaine to do well against Pence?
I love the denial coming from 4chan/Redditt, if anything Donald won the troll vote all right, I dont visit 4chan or Redditt, but I really want to visit that webpage if Clinton wins just to see the meltdowns and Salt that is going to generate from those delusional Trump fans.
Sure was fun to watch last time though
Really though all Kaine needs to do is bring up the horrible shit Pence has done or tried to do. The guy wants the government to pay for conversion therapy, there's no defending shit like that.
Didn't she only mention it once where as Trump brought up his properties over and over and over.
Who talks like that about their own wife or mother? Absolutely absurd.
It's the same motivation that allowed Trump to soak up many Bernie supporters. People are frustrated by a bureaucracy they feel does not work for them, watching the wheels of government turn without getting anywhere. I couldn't tell you why they feel Trump is the person who can fix this other than he's not a politician (which to me sounds a bit like saying since medical errors are so common, maybe we should get a baker to do some appendectomies in place of a surgeon or two).
Yep. And having the moderator try to reign Trump in would mean he would be able to start a narrative that the media is rigging the debate system against him.
Let him proceed.
Yep. And having the moderator try to reign Trump in would mean he would be able to start a narrative that the media is rigging the debate system against him.
Let him proceed.
Who talks like that about their own wife or mother? Absolutely absurd.
There's a very good reason Trump leans into his sexist remarks.Yep, brought up once in the transcripts. But of course she's getting scrutinized and having her statements exaggerated because...
People like talking about women in certain ways, not unlike this GOP voter guy.
Which is pretty awful.
Hillary didn't seem anything like a bitch last night. Also writing someone off because they remind you of your wife or mother doesn't seem like a good look for that person.
This.Misogynists.
I've been visiting the Reddit off and on to see the reaction of his supporters. It's a constant echo of the media being biased, downright lies being taken as truths and truths being taken as lies and an entire circus around the idea that the election will be rigged and Clinton will win because it's rigged.
A lot of the people on there fully expect Clinton to win because of how the system is rigged. I'd be more curious how things would be if Trump were to win.
Except people didn't eat his shit up, as the aftermath of this debate is showing. By in large he came off terribly. That's the narrative right now, that he had a terrible debate. Remember lost in all of this crap about his recent momentum and Hillary having super AIDS is the fact that HE is behind, and if you look at the electoral map he is significantly behind. He is the one that needs to make inroads with undecideds, millennials and minorities. Simply maintaining is good for her, not him. Trump being Trump means he had a terrible debate.
Absolutely. Really couldn't give a shit about her granddaughter and rolled my eyes pretty hard when she opened up with that. But once she just laid down policies and actual facts, whilst just being herself, she just pretty much annihilated Trump.To me Hillary is only unlikeable when she's trying to do small talk and be relatable. Her being a brilliant woman who can spew policy makes her a fascinating person.
No idea if it's been posted, but theres a good WaPo article about what newssites, coservative and liberal, as well as many republican politicians and activists thought of Trump.
It was nearly universally negative.
Daily 202: Why Even Republicans Think Clinton Won the First Debate
I'm not going to post excerps, because there's so much, but I highly recommend it if you want to see the full reaction to the debate.
Even if you are a Trump supporter, you have to think that he left a lot on the table, writes GOP supper lobbyist Ed Rogers, a veteran of the Reagan and Bush 41 White Houses. He didnt see the openings and he didnt swing at the softballs that came his way. He never used the word change, he didnt bore in on Hillarys email scandal and he never got around to the Clinton Foundation and Hillarys suspect integrity. Trump was inarticulate and rarely hit the bulls eye.
It's the same motivation that allowed Trump to soak up many Bernie supporters. People are frustrated by a bureaucracy they feel does not work for them, watching the wheels of government turn without getting anywhere. I couldn't tell you why they feel Trump is the person who can fix this other than he's not a politician (which to me sounds a bit like saying since medical errors are so common, maybe we should get a baker to do some appendectomies in place of a surgeon or two).