• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Presidential Debate #1 |Hofstra University| PRESS X TO SEAN

Who won the debate?


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.

RPGCrazied

Member
All he has to do is bring up his anti gay laws he dabbled in, even said he could convert gay people straight via therapy. He is a psycho.
 

Caja 117

Member
I love the denial coming from 4chan/Redditt, if anything Donald won the troll vote all right, I dont visit 4chan or Redditt, but I really want to visit that webpage if Clinton wins just to see the meltdowns and Salt that is going to generate from those delusional Trump fans.
 

Red

Member
I just heard the "too presidential " complaint



What the fuck? What does that even mean?
Rehearsed, staid, playing to expectations.

Y'all do yourselves a disservice by assuming Trump people want a candidate who looks like he belongs in office. They are voting for him precisely because he does not look or act presidential. News outlets that focus on how presidential he looks are speculating on his appeal to moderates and undecideds who for whatever reason are seriously considering Trump as an option. Despite this, a large portion of his appeal is that he is a political outsider, and as an outsider he has no need to fit the presidential mold. To folks this resonates with, "too presidential" is indeed a valid criticism. It is too normal, status quo, and they choose to vote against that.
 

Anarky

Banned
CtYD21pWIAAuydI.jpg
 

Neoweee

Member
Since Pence has to play defense for Trump alongside stanning for republican policy, I think Kaine has the advantage coming in.

I think that's a good read on the situation. Pence is a polished, traditional politician, but he comes in with the Trump handicap so has to cover his own shit record and Trump's crap.
 
The key here being that Trump is far more a part of the "elite establishment" than Clinton ever was
I would separate 'elite' from 'establishment.' He's in the 1%, but in the manner of fungus that grows in the corners where the real establishment can't be bothered to reach. There's a world of difference between sizeable, independent, private means, and having the power to actually influence the public realm. This is on the level of banks, or entire industries. Trump is nowhere near that level socially or materially.

That's why people can justifiably think of him as an outsider. He's just a businessman, pure and simple, out to get the best deals (the best!) for himself. Regardless of the narrative around his bankruptcies and failed dealings. That stuff doesn't really seem to touch him. I don't know if Clinton can dismantle the notion that Trump is shrewd before the election. But I think she probably can get a grip on her own image as another cog in the same old machine.
 
Rehearsed, staid, playing to expectations.

Y'all do yourselves a disservice by assuming Trump people want a candidate who looks like he belongs in office. They are voting for him precisely because he does not look or act presidential. News outlets that focus on how presidential he looks are speculating on his appeal to moderates and undecideds who for whatever reason are seriously considering Trump as an option. Despite this, a large portion of his appeal is that he is a political outsider, and as an outsider he has no need to fit the presidential mold. To folks this resonates with, "too presidential" is indeed a valid criticism. It is too normal, status quo, and they choose to vote against that.

That's not a reasonable appeal to reasonable people, though.
 

Mahonay

Banned
I'm not defending the opinions of Trump supporters... Hell, I've been planning to vote for Clinton after having watching the DNC... The DNC sold me because it gave a history of what Hillary Clinton has done and showed exactly why she would be a great President. As someone in their thirties, my knowledge of Hillary Clinton amounted to having been a child and teenager during Bill's Presidency in the '90s and knowing about her time as Senator of New York and Secretary of State. To hear of what progressive things Hillary Clinton did in the '60s, '70s, and '80s was better at convincing me that she was the best choice over most of the arguments I've heard outside of the DNC which still amount to "She's not Donald Trump!"
Awesome. I'm glad you actually took the time to educate yourself. While I've not been the biggest fan of Hillary for a while now (voted Obama, vote Bernie), she definitely has the kind of experience that would suggest she could easily be a decent president.

EDIT: She also represents my views and beliefs infinitely more than Trump, but duh.
 
Crossposting, but wow.

Keeping in mind that people will typically say their candidate of choice did better no matter what, it's crazy that only 68% of Republicans think that Trump won. That's the kind of percent you'd expect from a college poll for a football game where you're expected to get blown out.
 
Yes but the VP debate isn't much of a thing. Maybe an extra stomp on the head to Trump's campaign.

Sure was fun to watch last time though

Really though all Kaine needs to do is bring up the horrible shit Pence has done or tried to do. The guy wants the government to pay for conversion therapy, there's no defending shit like that.
 

Siegmeyer

Member
Quoting myself from earlier in the thread because I couldn't find an answer, and asked it when most of America was asleep.

UK citizen here, just finished watching the debate, the first of any US presidential race I've watched in my life.

Just wanted to say that I thought the moderator was particularly weak, there was lots of shouting, interruptions and non-answers (from Trump mostly) that went completely unchecked. As such there was very little actual 'debate' and a lot of grandstanding. I thought Trump did poorly, but I could totally see his more vehement supporters thinking he won comfortably.

Is the moderation usually this lax? And can we expect stronger moderation in the next debates?


I was hoping the moderator would put a leash on Trump being Trump and not let him get away with rambling nonsense, but that didn't really happen.
 

kirby_fox

Banned
I love the denial coming from 4chan/Redditt, if anything Donald won the troll vote all right, I dont visit 4chan or Redditt, but I really want to visit that webpage if Clinton wins just to see the meltdowns and Salt that is going to generate from those delusional Trump fans.

I've been visiting the Reddit off and on to see the reaction of his supporters. It's a constant echo of the media being biased, downright lies being taken as truths and truths being taken as lies and an entire circus around the idea that the election will be rigged and Clinton will win because it's rigged.

A lot of the people on there fully expect Clinton to win because of how the system is rigged. I'd be more curious how things would be if Trump were to win.
 
Hell, he even had enough time to lay out the argument that he hasn't gone fully nasty on her, yet her campaign has wasted (200 millions, I think he said?) lot of money to slight him. Basically putting himself above it, and also preparing the field with his tactic of - "I only allow myself to go fully bananas on you, because you offended me first". Which proved to be very successful in the Republican nomination race.


I haven't checked the post-debates news, but are we sure that the "good temperament" comment really worked against him (undecided wise)? Because even though Hillary handled it well, I think he seeded something very nasty and potentially useful for him in the next debates.

Bullshit, he hasn't gone nasty on her? Just because he hasn't put out ads? You don't think all the lies he spews at his rallys aren't nasty? How many times has he called her crooked Hillary, encouraged lock her up chants at his rally? Saying she can't please her husband, that she founded ISIS?!!? Even his "oh i'm so honorable because I didn't bring up bill's infidelity", uh isn't that brining it up? That's not nasty? He doesn't need ads to do it, he says nasty shit about her constantly. The only people that think of him as "above the fray" are either ignorant or gullible.
 

Angry Grimace

Two cannibals are eating a clown. One turns to the other and says "does something taste funny to you?"

Yeah, let's vote for the guy who doesn't understand why we can't use nuclear weapons and is fine with abandoning our treaty obligations, and has questionable ties to the Russian government because, hey, his opponent seems "bitchy."

I was hoping the moderator would put a leash on Trump being Trump and not let him get away with rambling nonsense, but that didn't really happen.

Why? Trump mostly killed himself with rambling nonsense and the "ineffectiveness" of the moderator meant that Trump can't take the tack that the format and organization of the debate suppressed his ability to get his point across.
 

Protein

Banned
What's a good argument against those in "locked states" protest-voting for third party candidates? I'm to a point where I don't even want to think anymore. Press X for GAF argument.
 

Sephzilla

Member
Quoting myself from earlier in the thread because I couldn't find an answer, and asked it when most of America was asleep.




I was hoping the moderator would put a leash on Trump being Trump and not let him get away with rambling nonsense, but that didn't really happen.

In hindsight the moderator letting Trump ramble on is what helped Trump lose in my opinion
 

Red

Member
That's not a reasonable appeal to reasonable people, though.
It's the same motivation that allowed Trump to soak up many Bernie supporters. People are frustrated by a bureaucracy they feel does not work for them, watching the wheels of government turn without getting anywhere. I couldn't tell you why they feel Trump is the person who can fix this other than he's not a politician (which to me sounds a bit like saying since medical errors are so common, maybe we should get a baker to do some appendectomies in place of a surgeon or two).
 

Tingle

Member
Sure was fun to watch last time though

Really though all Kaine needs to do is bring up the horrible shit Pence has done or tried to do. The guy wants the government to pay for conversion therapy, there's no defending shit like that.

Also Pence seems to generally not be on the same page as Trump, so I wonder if making some of the issues about Trump will work in Kaine's favor.

Either Pence looks like a scumbag for agreeing with Trump, or Pence pisses off Trump's base by disagreeing.
 

Angry Grimace

Two cannibals are eating a clown. One turns to the other and says "does something taste funny to you?"
In hindsight the moderator letting Trump ramble on is what helped Trump lose in my opinion

Yep. And having the moderator try to reign Trump in would mean he would be able to start a narrative that the media is rigging the debate system against him.

Let him proceed.
 

Mahonay

Banned
Also Pence seems to generally not be on the same page as Trump, so I wonder if making some of the issues about Trump will work in Kaine's favor.

Either Pence looks like a scumbag for agreeing with Trump, or Pence pisses off Trump's base by disagreeing.
It's gonna be interesting that's for damn sure.
 
Can we expect Tim Kaine to do well against Pence?

Pence will basically have to sell all of Trump's positions which he hasn't done a good job of doing on the campaign trail, so I'm not expecting much better in a debate.

Will be curious how they both respond to a 'if you took over' question.

I love the denial coming from 4chan/Redditt, if anything Donald won the troll vote all right, I dont visit 4chan or Redditt, but I really want to visit that webpage if Clinton wins just to see the meltdowns and Salt that is going to generate from those delusional Trump fans.

Don't know about reddit, but most of /pol/ agreed he lost the debate. Was lots of fun seeing Trump "just fuck my shit up fam" and we should picked Ted Cruz threads.
 

Glix

Member
Sure was fun to watch last time though

Really though all Kaine needs to do is bring up the horrible shit Pence has done or tried to do. The guy wants the government to pay for conversion therapy, there's no defending shit like that.

Thats my favorite shit.

"As a republican, I am against government spending, and against the government interfering with our lives"

"Oh, except when it comes to those filthy gays. Then we will force them to live a certain way AND pay for it."
 

theWB27

Member
Lester Holt "How would you get the manufacturers and jobs to come back?"

Trump "Well first you don't let the jobs leave! The companies are leaving."
 
Didn't she only mention it once where as Trump brought up his properties over and over and over.

Yep, brought up once in the transcripts. But of course she's getting scrutinized and having her statements exaggerated because...

Who talks like that about their own wife or mother? Absolutely absurd.

People like talking about women in certain ways, not unlike this GOP voter guy.

Which is pretty awful.

Hillary didn't seem anything like a bitch last night. Also writing someone off because they remind you of your wife or mother doesn't seem like a good look for that person.

It's the same motivation that allowed Trump to soak up many Bernie supporters. People are frustrated by a bureaucracy they feel does not work for them, watching the wheels of government turn without getting anywhere. I couldn't tell you why they feel Trump is the person who can fix this other than he's not a politician (which to me sounds a bit like saying since medical errors are so common, maybe we should get a baker to do some appendectomies in place of a surgeon or two).

The thing is, the numbers show that the government is working for people. Employment rates, jobs, the economy, etc.

Legalizing marijuana and decriminalizing it, LGBTQ rights, etc.

But like, people would have to do research to see that I guess?
 
Yep. And having the moderator try to reign Trump in would mean he would be able to start a narrative that the media is rigging the debate system against him.

Let him proceed.

That's how I feel about it, too. He played the "Please proceed" style of moderation and it was actually pretty effective. At one point, Trump was basically talking AT him, almost aggressively and Lester just sat there like. 0_0. It was a noticeably awkward moment as there was only silent filling the moment after.

Made him look like a jackass.
 

Mahonay

Banned
Yep, brought up once in the transcripts. But of course she's getting scrutinized and having her statements exaggerated because...



People like talking about women in certain ways, not unlike this GOP voter guy.

Which is pretty awful.

Hillary didn't seem anything like a bitch last night. Also writing someone off because they remind you of your wife or mother doesn't seem like a good look for that person.
There's a very good reason Trump leans into his sexist remarks.
Misogynists.
This.
 

Trurl

Banned
To me Hillary is only unlikeable when she's trying to do small talk and be relatable. Her being a brilliant woman who can spew policy makes her a fascinating person.
 

Caja 117

Member
I've been visiting the Reddit off and on to see the reaction of his supporters. It's a constant echo of the media being biased, downright lies being taken as truths and truths being taken as lies and an entire circus around the idea that the election will be rigged and Clinton will win because it's rigged.

A lot of the people on there fully expect Clinton to win because of how the system is rigged. I'd be more curious how things would be if Trump were to win.

You mean the clinton side? Its curiosity for me more because Trumps fans live in an different fabric of reality, so the conspiracy theory will go full blown i Clinto wins everything but to accept the fact that She won fair.


This is the misogynist SHIT that Hillary also has to go against, Because she is a woman is also part on why some people hate her. Hell, I work in a place where everyone (minus 1 employee) is Hispanic, and there are a few that will not vote for Clinton because she is a woman, As I quote one of them: "Other Countries will loose respect to USA with a Woman in power" I really didn't try to engage the Irony when in reality the respect is going to be lost if Trump wins.
 
Except people didn't eat his shit up, as the aftermath of this debate is showing. By in large he came off terribly. That's the narrative right now, that he had a terrible debate. Remember lost in all of this crap about his recent momentum and Hillary having super AIDS is the fact that HE is behind, and if you look at the electoral map he is significantly behind. He is the one that needs to make inroads with undecideds, millennials and minorities. Simply maintaining is good for her, not him. Trump being Trump means he had a terrible debate.

Right in a 538 headline from a recent article it says, "Clinton Won The Debate, Which Means She’s Likely To Gain In The Polls If she doesn’t, Trump could be tough to beat."

http://fivethirtyeight.com/features...which-means-shes-likely-to-gain-in-the-polls/

We won't know if Trump had a terrible debate according to scientific polls until more time has passed and we see a gain for Clinton. If there's no movement in the data or movement towards Trump, then I'd imagine Hillary will be in full blown panic mode.
 

Mahonay

Banned
To me Hillary is only unlikeable when she's trying to do small talk and be relatable. Her being a brilliant woman who can spew policy makes her a fascinating person.
Absolutely. Really couldn't give a shit about her granddaughter and rolled my eyes pretty hard when she opened up with that. But once she just laid down policies and actual facts, whilst just being herself, she just pretty much annihilated Trump.
 
No idea if it's been posted, but theres a good WaPo article about what newssites, coservative and liberal, as well as many republican politicians and activists thought of Trump.

It was nearly universally negative.

Daily 202: Why Even Republicans Think Clinton Won the First Debate

I'm not going to post excerps, because there's so much, but I highly recommend it if you want to see the full reaction to the debate.

“Even if you are a Trump supporter, you have to think that he left a lot on the table,” writes GOP supper lobbyist Ed Rogers, a veteran of the Reagan and Bush 41 White Houses. “He didn’t see the openings and he didn’t swing at the softballs that came his way. He never used the word ‘change,’ he didn’t bore in on Hillary’s email scandal and he never got around to the Clinton Foundation and Hillary’s suspect integrity. Trump was inarticulate and rarely hit the bull’s eye.”

Yep, concentrating on emails, bengazi and the Clinton Foundation would have turned this disaster around.

I'd have loved him to mention the Clinton Foundation btw. That would have been the mother of all opening for her to criticize the Trump foundation and Trump's "suspect integrity".
 
It's the same motivation that allowed Trump to soak up many Bernie supporters. People are frustrated by a bureaucracy they feel does not work for them, watching the wheels of government turn without getting anywhere. I couldn't tell you why they feel Trump is the person who can fix this other than he's not a politician (which to me sounds a bit like saying since medical errors are so common, maybe we should get a baker to do some appendectomies in place of a surgeon or two).

Trump needs undecideds, and at this point the outsider appeal isn't working for anyone other than the people already intending on voting for Trump.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom