I think Trump did a phenomenal job all things considered. Cocaine high and what not.
Ken Bone is trending worldwide. Some good came from all of this.
This was pretty fascinating.
Clinton's strategy was an interesting appeal to normalcy. Instead of getting too much in a pissing match with Trump, she tried to focus on answering the question for the most part and brushing off Trump's accusations. Her aim was definitely to make her campaign seem like it was above the shitshow of this election, that she was putting policy over reality TV show antics and that even if she could demolish Trump she would abstain from it for the sake of decency. It's an interesting angle, and it aims to directly counter Trump when he draws out claims like "she has lot of evil in her heart" and such and such.
Meanwhile Trump was kinda more of the same, but definitely a bit more refined. He was able to stick it to Clinton on a couple of key points regarding the emails and her connections with billionaire doners. But he definitely weakened a bit as the debate moved on and got utterly destroyed during the foreign policy segment.
Overall I can't really call a winner, depends on whether Clinton's strategy appeals to voters. The CNN poll is encouraging, but I'll wait for a few more.
incomming butthurt
They're worse than leaning one way or the other with the constant "both sides get exposure" bs. If some dumb fuck is spouting bullshit you call them, not simply give them a free mic like cnn does and present them as some viable alternative.
Lol Wolf put the numbers in her face hahaha
If you're asking how many people raised their hand for Trump, it was only 1 person out of the 20.
Yeah he did a great job not answering questions and threatening his opponent. That part where he attacked the moderators was stellar. Bravo!
He'll continue to lose the post-debate debates.
Who is this person and why should we believe them?
Pacing erratically back and forth, immediately deflecting to attack Clinton when asked a question, interrupting while Clinton is talking, and you call Trump more refined?
I'm not worried about Hillary winning any more. I want Hillary's coattails lengthened. I don't think this result did that.
I just turned it off.
Kellyanne is probably Trumps best hire of 2016 tbh, she's fantastic at her job.
What is especially terrifying is the audience applauded when he said he was going to throw Hillary in jail.
I love when they act like people can't see what they're doing.
It is a real fucking thing. He is graded on a curve, he has been this entire cycle. He isn't a politician, etc. You serious?
I'm not talking about his campaign, why are you having such a hard time with that. I'm talking about one thing, the debate. Nothing more. Stop moving this to something else.
The expectation was he was going to get dunked on, he was going to ethered, etc. It was a draw, i.e a win for him via the expectations. Still voting for and supporting Clinton. Just trying to have a conversation.
Just gonna assume all this is bullshit until someone reputable Cosigns itWho is this person and why should we believe them?
Martha better debated Trump than Clinton did.P.S. Martha and Anderson were on point. I feel a bit bad for the previous moderators because I think they got unfairly blamed a bit for the flow of the debate, but these two totally owned it.
They're not conservative either. They're biased toward ratings. But people will see in them what they hate no matter what because they try to please everyone.
I don't think Conway's in any way conflicted about what she does, some people are terrible and capable as opposed to just being terrible.
Lol yeah he completely lost the plot or what he was supposed to do tonight.yeah, trump did better than expectations, which is true, but he didn't 'win' which is the point of a town hall debate, to get some undecided under your wing.
kinda weird he just used his normal 'trump mode' from his rally's like he assumed the undecided cares about that?
I feel like they always have to stretch to find a "True" answer when fact checking Trump.CNN fact check lol
P.S. Martha and Anderson were on point. I feel a bit bad for the previous moderators because I think they got unfairly blamed a bit for the flow of the debate, but these two totally owned it.
Well, of course, but I was talking in general. MSNBC is biased towards ratings, but leans more liberal. But CNN has always been conservative-moderate leaning, ratings aside.
Do fact checkers influence much?? Is there any proof one way or the other? I know it makes sense intuitively, but are there surveys or polls that show how much people care about the facts?
You guys got to give Kellyanne credit. She's working with Donald Trump possibly the worst candidate in presidential history and is finding a way to defend him. She's basically a real life Olivia Pope.
Just gonna assume all this is bullshit until someone reputable Cosigns it
Pacing erratically back and forth, immediately deflecting to attack Clinton when asked a question, interrupting while Clinton is talking, and you call Trump more refined?
BBC analysts all basically agreed that Trump "won" the debate if for no other reason than this didn't end up being the massive harakiri on-stage disaster that democrats were hoping for. He in got out a number of soundbites that will play well to his base (but no one else) and at this point that's the best he could hope for.
Well, of course, but I was talking in general. MSNBC is biased towards ratings, but leans more liberal. But CNN has always been conservative-moderate leaning, ratings aside.
The things he said were idiotic and prove for the millionth time he doesn't know the issues, doesn't know world events or how things work. Just saw a clip of the, "We have to make sure Muslims report hatred" line. Like, what the fuck are you even talking about? Clueless.
Man I felt so bad for her. Fucking Christ.I think we can know one thing for absolute 100% certainty: Trump insured that Muslim girl will never vote for him.
"they're just words, folks".