Most of these games you mentioned are very LGBT Friendly.
In Baldur’s Gate 3, you can hook up with any of the six main party members you want as all of them are basically treated as bisexual so players don’t become limited by how they make their player character. The game does not limit you in any way in terms of the straight romance options, so complaining about LGBT options is ridiculous. You can’t handle seeing your character hook up with someone of the same gender, well guess what, you don’t have to in any way shape or form.
Also, the bear is a male elven druid, and he can hook up with a male or female players, so calling that scene homosexual implies you don’t really know much about the game at all. It’s also totally optional, and fits the kind of crazy shenanigans D&D players will get up to, and not really a massive deal within the game as A) the elven Druid’s mind is fully intact, you’re not fucking a full animal, and B) the scene cuts away before showing anything. Like what, letting players kill any NPC they want, including children, is okay, but the above is too much? Come on.
The difference also between BG 3 and the game in the topic is that in BG 3 all these characters are definitely adults, and this Princess game, not so much.
Also, bringing up BG 3 is hilariously ironic considering the Japanese release of BG 3 was censored.
Sony would probably have no problem sexualising children if there was stuff like pronouns, gender identity or sex changing involved.
You’re coming off as desperate if you need to make baseless accusations like that. Do better.
To be clear, I don’t think anyone who plays this princess game or those who made it are necessarily a pedophile/groomer/etc., as that’s an unfair assumption. You should strive to have a similar mindset, as doing otherwise is just a cheap attack on people’s integrity.