Both game look awesome, and both are out from alpha stage. DC [1080p 30fps, 12 cars on track] will be out in October, and pCARS [1080p 60fps, ~50cars on track] will be out in November.
Project CARS PS4 Gameplay - Direct Feed HD 1080 Capture.
- Thread starter Guymelef
- Start date
Both game look awesome, and both are out from alpha stage. DC [1080p 30fps, 12 cars on track] will be out in October, and pCARS [1080p 60fps, ~50cars on track] will be out in November.
I don't feel like arguing with you about which one looks better, especially when "beautiful" is such a vague word.
What I mean about the lighting is that DC use spectacular lighting to enhance the artistic quality of its images.
As I said, I find DC more "beautiful" than DC in an artistic way (and i'm sorry fresquito but video and gifs are good sources to judge that despie not having the shaprness of the real one).
Pcars is using a more realistic lighting, hence a little more "boring to look", and you need to find specific moment of the day to show off lighting condition on par with DC (just like when you want to take a photo in real life).
And let's face it, tracks have mostly very dull look because of security reasons (large space to run off, borded by grandstand for the spectators). Open road are always more exciting to look at.
Not confirmed yet for pcars (at least there weren't 50 cars in the video shown).
Devs still need to wait for the optimization to be finished and test different situation to see how many cars console will be able to display while maintaining the framerate iw the worse case scenarios. The is also network limitation for multiplayer.
But indeed, pcars has already shown console vids with more than 12 cars on track
You can judge what looks more pleasing on the eye going by YT. You can get a general idea, but that's it. For istance, people are concluding that pCARS doesn't have rendered grass because the blurry image shown in the video. The game has grass and it makes a difference. We're talking about graphics here, and these aspects are important to determine what game has better graphics.
What people are doing here is comparing two albums and trying to argue which one has better audio going by tapes recorded from the radio.
Diehard knows what he's talking about. Let's leave it at there.
The honest truth, whether most people dogging it will admit it or not.
From the start, the comparison is biased since people are trying to compare which game is more beautiful, which is already an abstract concept, instead of which one looks more realistic, or which one looks more detailed. The later can't be judged from compressed gifs and videos for sure.
I personally don't care about how detailed the grass is (as long as it gets a realistic feeling while i'm in movement) , since I don't plan to stop my car on track to look at it during the race ^^
Nice arrows, looks good!