Best looking, true, but how are the performance? Surely not how they could be it they were exclusive to a single console (which is what sony is famous for. There is a reason if most of the best looking games out there are made by their studios).
Or very bad because a PS4 looking corridor game that screams "I can run on potato Jaguar cores" should not have high CPU usage.
Ubisoft games are murdering CPUs since AC Origins (maybe even before), so not a good parameter too.
Sony themselves said 45% better rasterization performance . Ps5 base is already well tested and performs identical to a 6700 ( non xt ) so that 45% better means 7700xt rasterization performance
I had similar experiences many years ago. Not bought a pc myself for a long long time now. Showing up to a private workshop with apple devs and designers and slapping down a pc was humbling, I went to Apple the next day and came away £3500 lighter.Dude, I have a 4070 Super which is supposed to be mid-range and I'm playing all the new stuff at 4K (DLSS) and 60fps.
Also, whatever happened to your friend (assuming he's a real person) is not the norm in any way.
Performance's good? And there are some Sony games this generation already, they don't look better than AW2 for example.
Exactly, we are comparing to older PC GPU's right now since the AMD's 8000 and Nvidia's 5000 series are some months away still (or less in the latter case), comparisons will be easier then, but the 8700XT won't be over 500$.
I smell BS. I doubt about a delay so long even for someone living in the middle of the Antarctica.
Dude, it was 20 years ago, all I remember was saving up to spend £1500 about 6-12 month before its planned release, on a rig that should played it on full spec, it was delayed, by the time it came out it was still buggy and chuggy on medium spec.
What the hell does this even mean?
And if a 5060 costs $700 just for a GPU only? What then?
Did you complain to the store? Did you built it yourself? A computer having issues day 1 isn't normal.
Was it made of chocolate or something? What does this mean?
I don't understand what you mean by the delay. The game got delayed or was it the PC?
The 4070 Super launched with an RRP of $600, so that seems unlikely. Probably the the 5060 will be slower even than the regular 4070. Maybe it could be $550 for the typical barely an improvement pricing.
He was trying to run Crysis. Lol.
Dude.. wtf, IQ on the Pro looks already absolutely insane here and it's a goddamn YT video.
This same footage looked ridiculous on the OG stream. Part II footage made cringe in particular, but here looks legitimately unreal. Damn.
True way higher base resolution and better quality upscaling makes a lot of difference. And this is with Youtube compression.
Dude.. wtf, IQ on the Pro looks already absolutely insane here and it's a goddamn YT video.
This same footage looked ridiculous on the OG stream. Part II footage made cringe in particular, but here looks legitimately unreal. Damn.
?
I had a bash and I'd say this would be pretty close and I'll add some justification as well. I did try and make it fit in a micro case but I don't have enough time so just went with a default case for the purposes of the experiment. List is here: https://uk.pcpartpicker.com/list/FgJ6TY
I included a monitor on the assumption one would be needed just so a complete price was visible. Happy to knock it off though which bring the price down to £1295 if using no used parts. And for the record I don't think used parts should be allowed unless you allow a trade in price of a PS5 against the Pro.
CPU is generally comparable and has more oomph. Don't think there would be much disagreement there
CPU Cooler I've opted for the Dark Rock Pro (rather than the Noctua D15). Again, we're going for comparable and the PS5 focused on producing a whisper silent console which it is
Motherboard, memory and M2 are all pretty standard fair. Went for a specific PCIE 4, 2TB 2280
The GPU I think again is comparable to the PS5 Pro given it needs an extra lift for those RDNA 4 features. I did think about the 4070 Super as it has best in class DLSS to rival PSSR but that would bump the price up more
PC case again focusing on complementing the noise and also factoring in a bit of offset of not using SFF
PSU pretty standard
Windows License
*Not shown* DualSense @ £60 as well, and a flat £50 for a mnk combo
Which brings that out at retail ~ £1,345
With noctua D15: £1,400
With 4070: £1,450
True way higher base resolution and better quality upscaling makes a lot of difference. And this is with Youtube compression.
How is this different to nvidia using Cyberpunk in tech demos? Another 2020 game also on PS4.
That's a nice build. If i were to build a PC would be something like that. In my case would need a monitor.
If I had to guess 96. Same as the 6800 and 7700/7800 XT. And considering PS5 Pro also has 60 CU's.
Exactly now go back to what you said:
No, because this stuff isn't relevant to your and my point. As I said this isn't a pissing contest between PC and PS4 or TLOU vs CP. If TLOU had released on Wii would that justify using TLOU for tech demos of added features later on? Since the Wii version would have looked bad in comparison too just like CP did on PS4. Now show the differences between 2080, 3080, 4080 and you'll see they used it to show tech demos of similar differences in DLSS3 and the same "2020 PS4/PC games have never looked so good!" applies again. Your point was the age of the game not how they look bad or whatever because they both look good.
god dayum
yes i use light theme because it's the OG
I doubt that, because that would make the Pro a very imbalanced design. In terms of fill-rate,the Pro would be better than the Series X but less than the base PS5. Granted,a new architecture can mean doing more with less,but that still is a weird design.
