Among the vr youtubers I've been seeing on youtube the quest 2 is the most popular vr headset. And so many of them are getting vr2.
Sure, instead of saying "it's gonna fail" over and over without any number prediction, define your view of fail.
Sure, both. Now will there be some that love of it? Of course. Overall, though, PSVR2 will be a failure from a consumer point of view and company POV.
They only need to make one cent more than it costed to develop, manufacture and distribution/marketing for it to be profitable.
Cheers for that. Some interesting numbers you put out there. I'd have to compare some data (number of PS4s vs PS5s out there etc etc) and of course PSVR2 is more expensive than PSVR1 (inflation be damned etc). But in general we're in agreement.
Because then it would be like every other low-mid level VR headset out there
+ xbox chad
+ xbox chadPC gamer thinks PSVR2 will fail.
Well we can agree to disagree.
disagree all you like, I'd still rather have high end VR than low-mid level VR
Have you tried Half Life Alyx over wireless AirLink etc from a decent PC to the Quest 2? It's extraordinarily impressive. You do know the resolution per eye for the Quest 2 is almost the same as the PSVR2, right? Now of course the technology isn't as good in the Quest 2 (lenses, power etc), but even still…
What the hell are you talking about with this absolute drivelling nonsense?
You see this is what I was trying to point out, current low-mid end VR isnt suitable for AAA games (yes you can do it wirelessly but you still would need a beefy PC to do it), thats why Sony have gone the ETFR route, they want to do AAA, whether thats VR native games or hybrid games. Headsets like the Quest 2 rely a lot on native support for the headset meaning you are limited to mobile like VR (Quest 3 will not change that).
I'd say its possible to a degree, its just that they cant guarantee that all the time and for every user and ETFR latency needs to be low constantly so that it is effective/doesn't cause visual issues.
Not to mention you can have fully motion rig working with gt7 ;d
Definitely not true.
We already has first reaction of gt7 vr by people like SuperGT who does like 0 vr content and even he said he felt completly fine after 1h of playing it.
I played both Driveclub VR and Wipeout VR with zero issues.
Correct. It's just like the meta quest 1&2.
Correct, it uses inside out tracking so there are 4 outward pointing cameras on the headset that detect the position of the headset in relation to its surroundings and also the position of the controllers.
You don't know what you're talking about. I airlink PC VR games to my Quest 2 all the time. And the quality is remarkable. I'm astonished by how well it performs and how good it looks.
Man the graphics comparison threads these Friday will be something
I did not, and nobody I know did, either. It's vomit-inducing. Am I saying 100% of people will have this reaction? Nope. Will many? Yep. Again, let's pick up this conversation in a little while.
Oh, seems your reading ability has taken a hit when you fell off your high horse? "although wireless can also be used if you know what you're doing". Quote from what I said.
To be fair it should be 600-700, because it's a standalone.
There's definitely a 'training' element to getting VR-legs. At first I was getting a bit light headed from Driveclub for sure, but spending more time with it it got better and I had more resilience to feeling sick in VR experiences.
I'm not sure why everyone thinks Half Life Alyx is coming to PS VR2. I can see Valve wanting to keep that game to push sells for their own VR headsets. They might even make a new headset to compete with the Quest and PS VR. Don't see why they would give that game up to Sony. It's not like valve is hurting for money and desperately needs the game to sell.
Seeing GT7 made me place another pre-order but the reviews this week will really make or break if I decide to keep this pre-order because the price does still have me on the fence.
I'm referring back to the original post now, if you're not confident your wireless network can handle the latency and bandwidth (now 801n network etc. which many still use), it won't be a pleasant experience. I explained this in my original post, and it doesn't matter if the software is good and what's not if the network can't handle it well. No need to start insulting people, it doesn't make you look good.
Wait what? Is this confirmed?
And on the Spectrum, it could involve fiddling with a cassette deck and screwdriver for 10 minutes.
