Banjo-Kazooie
Member
Opinions and all but after playing the game for a few days now I can't fathom how anyone can play this and think the highest it's worth is 40%.
Uncharted 4 and TLOU2 will both likely get rave reviews despite being rehashes of last gen games, people obviously haven't got bored of that formula yet
Jeff doesn't like Uncharted, Tomb Raider or Last of Us...
Third person cinematic shooters have never really been his thing
IThat's a poor decision. Plus instead of making live action video they should have included multiplayer (and get more cash by selling items).
It's like "hey man I know you don't like sports games and don't watch NHL, but you'll be reviewing NHL 17" .... "OK!!!"And he never reviewed those games. Why do it now?
Not specifically 3rd person but Jeff enjoys guite a lot of games that I find generic and boring .. for example open-world shooters such as Far Cry 3. Over the years of following him and his views on games, I found that my tastes are almost contrary to his'. He loves instant gratification and he cares little for aspects such as atmosphere, evidenced by his complete disregard for games such as Limbo and Red Dead Redemption.oh really ? You mean to tell me the thing i just typed ?
"Jeff however, is not easily swayed by great graphics or AAA polish"
That said, he looks for, and appreciates other qualities in 3rd person shooters. So he's not going easy on these types of games. But he still enjoys the once that aren't fucking by the book. It's a sentiment that i can get behind.
And Jeff will be there to represent a different take on these trendy games. And i will be there to agree with him, unless ND can somehow break free from all the genre tropes that makes these games so goddamn stale.
Not specifically 3rd person but Jeff enjoys guite a lot of games that I find generic and boring .. for example open-world shooters such as Far Cry 3. Over the years of following him and his views on games, I found that my tastes are almost contrary to his'. He loves instant gratification and he cares little for aspects such as atmosphere, evidenced by his complete disregard for games such as Limbo and Red Dead Redemption.
Much of the criticism put forth in all the QB reviews is surely valid (quality of level design, length etc.) but especially with Jeff, personal taste and preference play a huge role as far as evaluating games goes. And there is nothing really wrong with that but it should be taken into consideration.
Quantum Break is unique. Thanks to the combination with a TV series it manages to be completely different from other games. Both the series and the game have high production values. Hiring good actors, the well developed story and polished gameplay shows a big commitment from Remedy and Microsoft.
The game itself doesn't have anything new and in the end it shows some lack of variety, but it's a nice escape for those who are looking for something more traditional and a good story.
Right, but you could apply that argument to every genre and game. I vehemently disagree that innovation is a requirement to quality or fun factor. It is my belief that a game doesn't have to be revolutionary to be fun, it just has to do what's been done before, but really well, in a more polished, refined, better designed and delivered way. Not saying QB does that, I haven't played it yet, but just responding to the point of your broader critique.
Not specifically 3rd person but Jeff enjoys guite a lot of games that I find generic and boring .. for example open-world shooters such as Far Cry 3. Over the years of following him and his views on games, I found that my tastes are almost contrary to his'. He loves instant gratification and he cares little for aspects such as atmosphere, evidenced by his complete disregard for games such as Limbo and Red Dead Redemption.
Much of the criticism put forth in all the QB reviews is surely valid (quality of level design, length etc.) but especially with Jeff, personal taste and preference play a huge role as far as evaluating games goes. And there is nothing really wrong with that but it should be taken into consideration.
What trend? As someone who liked those games, I can barely name one this gen.
It's like "hey man I know you don't like sports games and don't watch NHL, but you'll be reviewing NHL 17" .... "OK!!!"
trends that oozed over from last gen:
- Forced walking sections
- trailing NPCs that offer quippy banter
- puzzling rooms ( that are almost offensively easy )
- platforming sections ( that are almost offensively easy )
- walk section > arena shootout > talk section rinse repeat.
New gen trends added for flavour ( of stale ):
- open world mechanics ( exploring lite )
- collectathons
- ability levels / rpg lite
I'm also someone who used to love the genre, but i'm seeing the same shit over and over and over and over and over and for most of the time its fine. I'm playing the Division furiously, but i'll get over it and most likely forget about it within the year. That 7.8 that the Division currently stands at is perfect. Its good fun, but nothing more then a distraction at best.
Weird to think that a game with a review distribution like this:
![]()
...is generating as much concern as we're seeing in this thread.
So. Is Remedy under threat?
Do it for Alan Wake 2!I really want to get this, but I may wait for a bit. I love Remedy's games but it's hard for me to bite at $60 if a game doesn't have much in the way of replay value.
So, is Remedy under threat? Everyone thought Lionhead is one of the Microsoft's #1 studios, part of their future. How about Remedy? Any thoughts?
You didn't list any games
Aren't they independent? I don't know how much own financial investment they made into QB, but I guess they will be fine (the game will sell good probably). Worst thing that MS can do is cut ties with them, but I don't see that happen at all.
Remedy isn't owned by Microsoft do they can't shut it down.So, is Remedy under threat? Everyone thought Lionhead is one of the Microsoft's #1 studios, part of their future. How about Remedy? Any thoughts?
It's a short game, without multiplayer. So you should see it on sale for cheap (used, even more cheaper) soon. Just wait a few days or weeks.I really want to get this, but I may wait for a bit. I love Remedy's games but it's hard for me to bite at $60 if a game doesn't have much in the way of replay value.
No, they are indie. MS does not own them.Are they? I thought they're MS 1st party.
Remedy isn't owned by Microsoft do they can't shut it down.
Remedy isn't owned by Microsoft do they can't shut it down.
And he never reviewed those games. Why do it now?
No, they are indie. MS does not own them.
Yup.It should be taken into consideration every single time you read a review - that's why the MC score is a wash for games.
If a reviewer you like and trust loves the game then go for it, if you find yourself disagreeing with a journalist a lot then you, personally, can disregard it.
Those review sites also consist of several people. Brad or whoever else at GB might've given it a different score than Jeff.The way I see it some low scores are to be expected, but the problem is that the low reviews are from some of my (and probably others) most trusted review sites like Giant Bomb, Gamespot and Metro Gamecentral.
I think the Story will be much better in UC4 and its improved dramatically mechanics wise. ND really seem to be putting out there best game and closing the series on a high note, I think even the critics tired of the formula will like it. Time will tell...And Jeff will be there to represent a different take on these trendy games. And i will be there to agree with him, unless ND can somehow break free from all the genre tropes that makes these games so goddamn stale.
I think the Story will be much better in UC4 and its improved dramatically mechanics wise. ND really seem to be putting out there best game and closing the series on a high note, I think even the critics tired of the formula will like it. Time will tell...