Isn't it just hold R and push button to auto aim at some dude?
How much time does the game make you do stuff and run around for nothing important? Not even the good type of nothing important.
If I want a proper western simulator I should be able to drop pianos on dudes, ride alligators down the Mississippi while drunk and firing pistols. There needs to be singing cats and peyote. I want my shamanic initiation El topo and the holy mountain, Lisa the painful/joyful wild west experience.
The ground should move like piano keys on an ocean. Doesn't matter Im the dude with the cool moustache and the sheriff badge also I'm insane. I'm legitimately Paul Bunyan riding blucifer from the Denver airport pissing gold nuggets in the wild west.
Give me arcanum wild west any day. I'll throw a jar of pickles at the bad guy who wears a hooded robe and hides in the shadows. Even godhand stage one was better. This is wartime in the cowlord kingdom. Let's get outta here.
Spider man, Ghost of tsushima, MGSV, batman arkham city/knight, and last of us part 2.What is a similar game that, in comparison, does have engaging and skill-based combat, in your opinion? Which games do you think of when you levy that criticism?
Of that list, I'd say that Metal Gear Solid V and The Last of Us Part II are the only ones that're really comparable. And you're definitely right; in comparison, MGSV feels way better to play.Spider man, Ghost of tsushima, MGSV, batman arkham city/knight, and last of us part 2.
I'm not asking for it be on that level but it's basically autoaim everything or unplayable. The melee combat sucks as well it's just Sad to me cause I played a ton of game and was thinking to my self imagine If this game had some engaging fun combat which it doesn't.
Looks like a hot spring to me. Or are you talking about the cairns in the background?Ok, anyone mind telling me what the hell is this thing?
It's a massive improvement over the first and plays similar to MGSV.Of that list, I'd say that Metal Gear Solid V and The Last of Us Part II are the only ones that're really comparable. And you're definitely right; in comparison, MGSV feels way better to play.
Too bad everything else about it sucked.
I can't speak for The Last of Us Part II; I haven't played it yet. But it has to be a significant improvement over the first for your statement to be true regarding Red Dead Redemption II, in my opinion.
100% agree.The game is a technical marvel with insane amount of details for sure, but that’s about it imo. It’s a slog to play, I don’t think I even made it halfway through before putting it down.
Really????? I have never heard its combat compared MGS. Would others on here agree with that? I haven’t played last of us part 2 because I couldn’t get on with the gameplay in the first one.It's a massive improvement over the first and plays similar to MGSV.
Fantastic story and performances, boring as hell gameplay and open-world.Never played this. Looks boring in gameplay videos.
Most people would agree it's one of the best TPS/stealth shooters it's just many hate what they did to the story so much so they don't want to give it any credit. its comparable to MGSV which has the best MGS gameplay by far.I’ve said this in other posts but the (beautiful and ahead of its time) open world is at odds with the story and moment to moment gameplay design.
Really????? I have never heard its combat compared MGS. Would others on here agree with that? I haven’t played last of us part 2 because I couldn’t get on with the gameplay in the first one.
Ready to be told I’m wrong but I’m skeptical it’s gameplay comes close most Metal Gear releases.
*sorry OP, I’m aware this is going off topic for you
Take2/R* be like,Still waiting for the pre order bonus to be unlocked by Rockstar alongside a 60fps patch
It's the polar opposite to MGS. RDR2's biggest failing is it's old mission design and extremely dated and sluggish gunplay.I’ve said this in other posts but the (beautiful and ahead of its time) open world is at odds with the story and moment to moment gameplay design.
Really????? I have never heard its combat compared MGS. Would others on here agree with that? I haven’t played last of us part 2 because I couldn’t get on with the gameplay in the first one.
Ready to be told I’m wrong but I’m skeptical it’s gameplay comes close most Metal Gear releases.
*sorry OP, I’m aware this is going off topic for you
MGSV and last us part 2 are not the polar opposite when it comes to combat/stealth. they both are share many things like great fluid gameplay, great animations, and many different way to tackle a scenario. They both have great controls.It's the polar opposite to MGS. RDR2's biggest failing is it's old mission design and extremely dated and sluggish gunplay.
The combat is very one note and the weakest part of the game.
Oh no my mistake I misread. I thought he was comparing MGSV's combat to RDR2MGSV and last us part 2 are not the polar opposite when it comes to combat/stealth. they both are share many things like great fluid gameplay, great animations, and many different way to tackle a scenario. They both have great controls.
Or you could just fast travel.You can autoride a horse from point X to point Y, with cinematography camera.
if there wasn't cinematography camera, i would also insanely boring
I just pay the bounty and move on. I mean it's not as if money is hard to come by.I agree with what you're saying but you do not get wanted by name when you commit crimes with a mask on. You'll simply be wanted.
How will you know if you'll like it or not if you don't try it?don't let other people hype you into playing something you won't like.
Did you notice the water at the dock in Annesburg where you confront Cornwall? I think it's to show what Cornwall's mining is doing to the environment.Natural Hot Spring
I love the differences in water quality, throughout the world. Take note of how dirty and disgusting the water is outside of the industrialized location.
Some people know themselves better than others.How will you know if you'll like it or not if you don't try it?
I never trust reviews, comments etc because there's always people who say it's great and others who say it's crap.Some people know themselves better than others.
For example, I know, for sure, that I don't like games that involve a heavy amount of crafting and looting. I know that I don't find Minecraft interesting at all, and I know that I don't think Breath of the Wild was anywhere near as good as others make it out to be. As a result, I also know that I wouldn't enjoy Tears of the Kingdom, based on videos, reviews, comments, etc..., so I have no interest in playing it.
There are many other games that do have my interest, so those are the ones on which I'll spend my time and money. I encourage other people to do the same with the games that interest them over the ones that don't, regardless of how popular they are.
I think too many gamers, especially those who frequent sites like this, care more about being a part of the cultural zeitgeist or specific conversation (FOMO) than actually playing games (it's a major factor in backlogs, in my opinion).
Did you notice the water at the dock in Annesburg where you confront Cornwall? I think it's to show what Cornwall's mining is doing to the environment.
Oh I agree. Actually old design is a Rockstar problem, not just TDR2It's the polar opposite to MGS. RDR2's biggest failing is it's old mission design and extremely dated and sluggish gunplay.
The combat is very one note and the weakest part of the game.