Im gonna watch Looper review after I see the film later today.
Do they completely spoil sinister? I kinda wanna see it.
Yeah, there are spoilers.
I was thinking about this the other day. I've heard that there are two kinds of film reviews, journalistic, and academic.
The journalistic review is like Siskel & Ebert. It's the "movie reporter" in the paper or on the 5 o'clock news. They watch movies and then they simply tell you if the movies were good or not. Or if they're suited for a particular audience, maybe they tell you
which audiences will like it and which ones won't. Basically you watch a journalistic review in order to decide if you want to watch a particular movie or not bother with it.
An academic review breaks down a movie, judges it, and tells you what it did right and what it did wrong. You kind of need to have seen a movie first before you watch it's breakdown.
The Plinkett reviews are perfect academic reviews. Half in the Bag seems to have the style and formula of a journalistic review series, but it's more like a set of smaller, earlier academic reviews. And I don't think that smaller and quicker are traits that lend themselves well to the academic style of reviewing. Of course, this is an underserved niche. Nobody else is doing it. And it Redlettermedia seems to enjoy making them. And I wouldn't ask them to change their style.
The thing I concluded from this line of thought is just to remind myself that Half in the Bag is
not a Siskel & Ebert-style journalistic review that can tell you if you want to watch a movie or not (even though they often conclude their reviews by asking whether they'd recommend the movie or not), it's a mini-academic review, like a Plinkett review but weaker and there are more of them, and they only really work if you've already seen the movies they watched.