Freeza Under The Shower
Member
Yay,
reference! That movie really deserves more love.
Halloween 3
It does, very underrated.Yay,reference! That movie really deserves more love.Halloween 3
I'm sure Jim is a wonderful guy but he just looks so uncomfortable by the dark humor that gets passed around and is half of the time staring at the desk silently.
And losing one seat in this discussions is too much maaaan
I'm sure Jim is a wonderful guy but he just looks so uncomfortable by the dark humor that gets passed around and is half of the time staring at the desk silently.
And losing one seat in this discussions is too much maaaan
Why did Jay disappear at the end?
Why did Jay disappear at the end?
I loved the editing in this episode. So many awkward moments got highlighted.
I was deeply offended when he told Jessi she's a Mary Sue.It's great that they could get Max Landis back to do another episode.
It's great that they could get Max Landis back to do another episode.
I just rage quit on the third furi boss. The last part of his battle left me with no will to continue. Fucking hell.
I'm loving these re:View episodes. I'm looking forward to this when I get back to the hotel this evening.
I have no idea who these youtubers are. Also the comments already have people who feel the need to defend the new movie for reasons.
The GB2 commentary is great too
https://redlettermedia.bandcamp.com/track/ghostbusters-2-half-in-the-bag-commentary-track
new re:view
and Cinemassacre just released a new video for a new series called Re-review where he re-reviews old movies... I'm glad someone dropped a "is this replacing half in the bag" comment on youtube
new re:view
and Cinemassacre just released a new video for a new series called Re-review where he re-reviews old movies... I'm glad someone dropped a "is this replacing half in the bag" comment on youtube
I'm fairly sure that Rich's comment on "prick in front of a red curtain" is actually Tim Heidecker, since they know him and he does On Cinema at the Cinema where he plays a bullshit (prick) reviewer, joined by perpetual 'special guest' Gregg Turkington.
The "what's he called again" heavily pointed in that direction anyway.
I didn't catch it while watching. Was it said as a dig against him? I'd be surprised if it was about Tim since Tim has actually been on HiTB before.
Well not exactly. re:view is movies they've never reviewed before. Just old (and new) movies they like that they didn't make a HITB for.that's not the same thing... he's re-visiting an old nerd episode and playing it again
talking about this, this is literally re:view
Well not exactly. re:view is movies they've never reviewed before. Just old (and new) movies they like that they didn't make a HITB for.
Re-review looks like he's just adding more to a previous review he did before.
It's basically more like when Doug (Nostalgia Critic) and his brother do a more fleshed out review of a movie that Doug had already done a NC video about.heh I guess, I just thought it was weird to see that in my subscription feed, I still like James he's an alright dude
Is it me or was Rich continually trying to take digs at the new Ghostbusters while Mike preferred to play it more diplomatically?
Mike has been pretty clear on his opinion in remakes in the past. He doesn't mind them as long as they try something different, so I believe he really is open to the idea of an all female Ghostbusters but doesn't necessarily think this movie looks good.
Eh, whatever, I like Ghostbusters 2.