Graphics Horse
Member
Holy fuck.
Well I can't row back from that typo, thankfully it's still past tense
Well I can't row back from that typo, thankfully it's still past tense
Releasing this at $300 is the exact same mistake the Wii U did. You're gonna need a serious hook besides portability to sell a less powerful console at a PS4/X1 price point.I disagree, if the product is differentiated enough, I don't think being "late" is a problem, especially when these other low prices aren't lower than NX's price (in the hypothetical "worst case scenario" where it costs 300).
A new console that you can play on the TV, pick up and take anywhere to play can be marketed at the same price as the competition if they play their cards right (again, perceived value),
I'm sure they want to sell it as low as possible, probably making a profit on each unit sold, but the reality is that production costs might not allow for a 200 price point. Maybe the rumors that NVidia gave them a good deal are true and they can do it though, but we're talking about new production lines with very recent technology, 200 smackers is a pretty low price for something like that.
Releasing this at $300 is the exact same mistake the Wii U did. You're gonna need a serious hook besides portability to sell a less powerful console at a PS4/X1 price point.
I think $250 seems a reasonable launch price it just depends on what they're offering. They need to be able to justify that sort of price and it's hard to make a judgement about that when really we still have no idea what the NX is.
It's time to stop Thamywhat if 10k ran a 10k
Yeah, $250 (with a pack in) at launch sounds reasonable...but they have to worry since Sony or MS can price match them within a year.I think $250 seems a reasonable launch price it just depends on what they're offering. They need to be able to justify that sort of price and it's hard to make a judgement about that when really we still have no idea what the NX is.
Yeah, $250 at launch sound reasonable...but they have to worry since Sony or MS can price match them within a year.
$199 sounds like the ideal price so they should probably be open to dropping the price before MS and Sony can offer something at $250.
I disagree, if the product is differentiated enough, I don't think being "late" is a problem, especially when these other low prices aren't lower than NX's price (in the hypothetical "worst case scenario" where it costs 300).
A new console that you can play on the TV, pick up and take anywhere to play can be marketed at the same price as the competition if they play their cards right (again, perceived value),
I'm sure they want to sell it as low as possible, probably making a profit on each unit sold, but the reality is that production costs might not allow for a 200 price point. Maybe the rumors that NVidia gave them a good deal are true and they can do it though, but we're talking about new production lines with very recent technology, 200 smackers is a pretty low price for something like that.
Being a dedicated portable in the mobile era is pretty irrelevant. Nintendo enthusiasts are also price sensitive, just look at the 3DS.I think 250 is the sweetspot, but 300 wouldn´t be THAT bad. Especially since Nintendo enthusiasts will forego the need to get two separate systems if the rumors turn out true, and they may be the only dedicated portable game in town. The value of 250 dollars this days isn´t what it was in 2011.
Just listened to the new episode of NVC, and at the end of episode Jose Otero announced that he's going on vacation - and I could swear, and maybe this is (probably) just paranoia - but it sounded as if Jose, Peer and Brian were all acting like they know SOMEthing and were choosing their words very carefully discussing NX...
Not sure what sense it makes... but I have a feeling Jose knows what's up.
Wii U has been $300 for like 3 years. 3DS's innards are cheap, without the 3D screen it can be sold at $80 (2DS)Frankly, $199 sound like a pipe dream especially if you consider what´s been rumored and the price of a New 3DS and a Wii U atm.
The biggest problem Wii U had was that it simply wasn't appealing. There's nothing magical about a 300 price point that makes it an impossible sell by itself.Releasing this at $300 is the exact same mistake the Wii U did. You're gonna need a serious hook besides portability to sell a less powerful console at a PS4/X1 price point.
Very suspicious indeed. Any other journos going on "holidays"?
Very suspicious indeed.
EVERYBODY seems to be going on vacation.
One of the biggest reasons the Wii U wasn't appealing was because it offered less than the competition at the same price. If the Wii U was cheaper maybe it had a better chance at reaching out to part of the marketshare.The biggest problem Wii U had was that it simply wasn't appealing. There's nothing magical about a 300 price point that makes it an impossible sell by itself.
Personally I think that a console with modern graphical capabilities you can play on the go or on the TV is a serious hook, but success usually depends on several factors, just like Wii U didn't fail just because of its price.
Will it be able to handle PS4/X1 games even if at lower graphical fidelity? Engines are very scaleable nowadays after all. If it does, will it get 3rd party support? I imagine that the prospect of playing FIFA or CoD or whatever on your big TV and being able to just pick it up, take it with you and play wherever and whenever you want can be a very enticing prospect.
We have 3 unless Natedrake was joking.
We have 3 unless Natedrake was joking.
EVERYBODY seems to be going on vacation. Its odd. Am I going crazy? I don´t recall hearing about so many journalists in the industry vacationing at the same time in september of all months.
Gonna be really funny to see who was bullshitting someday.
What about GoNintendo? Its easier to tell with smaller outlets like that...
Yeah, $250 (with a pack in) at launch sounds reasonable...but they have to worry since Sony or MS can price match them within a year.
$199 sounds like the ideal price so they should probably be open to dropping the price before MS and Sony can offer something at $250.
What about em? I checked their site updates section and I don't see anything of note.
That, and also MANY of the usual suspect deciding to be hush on NX reveal speculation like Emily.
We have 3 unless Natedrake was joking. Pretty sure he was joking.
Even the Wii was $250 at launch (with Wii Sports as pack-in). There's no way NX is gonna be less than that.
NateDrake never jokes.We have 3 unless Natedrake was joking. Pretty sure he was joking.
Depends. The 3DS was $250 too and required a price cut to get sales momentum going in the handheld space.
I feel like 3DS was made with a different price point in mind with the glowing reception giving them confidence to raise the price to $250. The botched launch with no notable software and poor hardware didn't help.Depends. The 3DS was $250 too and required a price cut to get sales momentum going in the handheld space.
I feel like 3DS was made with a different price point in mind with the glowing reception giving them confidence to raise the price to $250. The botched launch with no notable software and poor hardware didn't help.
Sure, but we're talking about a handheld that also doubles as a home console. It's more powerful than Nintendo's last home console, according to rumors. The 3DS doesn't even have the graphical capability of the Gamecube.
I think the proper way to think of NX, and how Nintendo is likely to sell it as, is as a home console that is portable. Not a handheld that you can play on a TV.
A better Wii U graphically is still dramatically less powerful than then home consoles of the competition. I dunno, it just sounds better to call it a super powerful handheld.
Sure, but we're talking about a handheld that also doubles as a home console. It's more powerful than Nintendo's last home console, according to rumors. The 3DS doesn't even have the graphical capability of the Gamecube.
I think the proper way to think of NX, and how Nintendo is likely to sell it as, is as a home console that is portable. Not a handheld that you can play on a TV.
I feel like 3DS was made with a different price point in mind with the glowing reception giving them confidence to raise the price to $250. The botched launch with no notable software and poor hardware didn't help.
That's the magic! To gamers it can be marketed as mainly a kickass handheld and to other audiences it can be a reasonably priced home console with games you can take on the go!
A cheap, multipurpose console with lots o' Nintendo games. That's good enough. Nintendo just needs the proper follow through.
That's the magic! To gamers it can be marketed as mainly a kickass handheld and to other audiences it can be a reasonably priced home console with games you can take on the go!
It's gotta be $199.99 without a game or $249.99 with a pack in game, since Nintendo want this to be affordable and not repeat the mistake the 3DS had. And Wii U.
That is almost impulse buy territory if they nail the hardware and software for it at launch and beyond.
$179.99 they could fly off the shelves. No expensive 3D screen this time, so just maybe ... but wishful thinking.
Games priced at $50, half way point between standard handheld games and console games prices. Harder pill to swallow if the games are full $60, which they might very well be at launch, and because of cart costs.
That's my reasoning.
If Nintendo can manage a pack in game as appealing as Wii Sports was, and the above price points, they are onto a potentially big thing.
Nobody will care besides Nintendo fans... Nowadays is all about teraflops, resolution, frame rate, the days were gameplay and fun are important are goneThat's the magic! To gamers it can be marketed as mainly a kickass handheld and to other audiences it can be a reasonably priced home console with games you can take on the go!