I am going to repost this with the other stuff that someone tried to rebut my argument because I seriously think this stuff isn't clear for some of you and that you should try to reread this in the context of what is being presented to investors.
First, from the presentation that someone tried to rebut my argument.
https://www.nintendo.co.jp/ir/en/library/events/130131/05.html
The following is from January 31st 2013.
The bolded is what people point to and say, "That's proof! Nintendo aren't making a hybrid, Iwata said so!"
Please, read this in the context of what is being said to investors. He is trying to clearly explain to investors what integrating the architectures for their future platforms means. He then says, "What we mean..." to clarify to investors what is going on so that they do not misunderstand things what merging platforms means. They are investors, the majority of them don't know how hardware works. He didn't deny a hybrid console in the context of what was being said.
Next, the following is from a Q&A in January 30th 2014.
https://www.nintendo.co.jp/ir/en/library/events/140130qa/02.html
I am posting some of the answer. Click the link for the rest.
He doesn't confirm what the NX is, he doesn't confirm that it's a hybrid but he doesn't confirm that it will have multiple form factors. He goes on about the architecture integration and then has ideas about whether there should be one form factor or multiple form factors for this integrated architecture.
He then uses Apple and Android as examples and wonders about whether consumers will just demand only one device in the future.
You guys should be reading this in the context of the rumours we have now about the NX being a hybrid, there was nothing stated that denied a hybrid. Nor has there been anything that has confirmed a hybrid, same deal for the multiple form factors.
I want someone to try to rebut what I said because there is clearly some reading comprehension problems happening at the moment because people have forgotten what was stated about something over two years ago.
Edit: Here's another fact. Things change.
Remember when Iwata was adamant that Nintendo would not develop games for mobile? Except Nintendo declared in 2015 that they would develop mobile games? Things change.
It's the exact same thing with rumours, things will change with regards to rumours, you might hear that a particular game is getting revealed at E3, suddenly it's not there, why? Well things changed and the game got delayed. That's why rumours can change too, but it doesn't suddenly mean that the rumour was fake (except for fake rumours of course). It had to have happened in reality at some point in time.
First, from the presentation that someone tried to rebut my argument.
https://www.nintendo.co.jp/ir/en/library/events/130131/05.html
The following is from January 31st 2013.
As you might already know from some newspaper reports, we will reorganize our development divisions next month for the first time in nine years. Two divisions which have independently developed handheld devices and home consoles will be united to form the Integrated Research & Development Division, which will be headed by Genyo Takeda, Senior Managing Director.
Last year we also started a project to integrate the architecture for our future platforms. What we mean by integrating platforms is not integrating handhelds devices and home consoles to make only one machine. What we are aiming at is to integrate the architecture to form a common basis for software development so that we can make software assets more transferrable, and operating systems and their build-in applications more portable, regardless of form factor or performance of each platform. They will also work to avoid software lineup shortages or software development delays which tend to happen just after the launch of new hardware.
Some time ago it was technologically impossible to have the same architecture for handheld devices and home consoles and what we did was therefore reasonable. Although it has not been long since we began to integrate the architecture and this will have no short-term result, we believe that it will provide a great benefit to our platform business in the long run. I am covering this topic as today is our Corporate Management Policy Briefing.
The bolded is what people point to and say, "That's proof! Nintendo aren't making a hybrid, Iwata said so!"
Please, read this in the context of what is being said to investors. He is trying to clearly explain to investors what integrating the architectures for their future platforms means. He then says, "What we mean..." to clarify to investors what is going on so that they do not misunderstand things what merging platforms means. They are investors, the majority of them don't know how hardware works. He didn't deny a hybrid console in the context of what was being said.
Next, the following is from a Q&A in January 30th 2014.
https://www.nintendo.co.jp/ir/en/library/events/140130qa/02.html
I am posting some of the answer. Click the link for the rest.
Q5:
You have explained your concern about users being divided by hardware. Currently, you have both a handheld device business and a home console business. I would like to know whether the organizational changes that took place last year are going to lead to, for example, the integration of handheld devices and home consoles into one system over the medium term, or a focus on cost saving and the improvement of resource efficiency in the medium run. Please also explain if you still have room to reduce research and development expenses.
A5:
...
In this perspective, while we are only going to be able to start this with the next system, it will become important for us to accurately take advantage of what we have done with the Wii U architecture. It of course does not mean that we are going to use exactly the same architecture as Wii U, but we are going to create a system that can absorb the Wii U architecture adequately. When this happens, home consoles and handheld devices will no longer be completely different, and they will become like brothers in a family of systems.
Still, I am not sure if the form factor (the size and configuration of the hardware) will be integrated. In contrast, the number of form factors might increase. Currently, we can only provide two form factors because if we had three or four different architectures, we would face serious shortages of software on every platform. To cite a specific case, Apple is able to release smart devices with various form factors one after another because there is one way of programming adopted by all platforms. Apple has a common platform called iOS. Another example is Android. Though there are various models, Android does not face software shortages because there is one common way of programming on the Android platform that works with various models. The point is, Nintendo platforms should be like those two examples. Whether we will ultimately need just one device will be determined by what consumers demand in the future, and that is not something we know at the moment. However, we are hoping to change and correct the situation in which we develop games for different platforms individually and sometimes disappoint consumers with game shortages as we attempt to move from one platform to another, and we believe that we will be able to deliver tangible results in the future.
He doesn't confirm what the NX is, he doesn't confirm that it's a hybrid but he doesn't confirm that it will have multiple form factors. He goes on about the architecture integration and then has ideas about whether there should be one form factor or multiple form factors for this integrated architecture.
He then uses Apple and Android as examples and wonders about whether consumers will just demand only one device in the future.
You guys should be reading this in the context of the rumours we have now about the NX being a hybrid, there was nothing stated that denied a hybrid. Nor has there been anything that has confirmed a hybrid, same deal for the multiple form factors.
I want someone to try to rebut what I said because there is clearly some reading comprehension problems happening at the moment because people have forgotten what was stated about something over two years ago.
Edit: Here's another fact. Things change.
Remember when Iwata was adamant that Nintendo would not develop games for mobile? Except Nintendo declared in 2015 that they would develop mobile games? Things change.
It's the exact same thing with rumours, things will change with regards to rumours, you might hear that a particular game is getting revealed at E3, suddenly it's not there, why? Well things changed and the game got delayed. That's why rumours can change too, but it doesn't suddenly mean that the rumour was fake (except for fake rumours of course). It had to have happened in reality at some point in time.