-Plasma Reus-
Service guarantees member status
Four of the most senior intelligence officers briefed Obama and Trump with this report.So how legitimate is this intelligence looking? Legitimate enough to get excited?
Four of the most senior intelligence officers briefed Obama and Trump with this report.So how legitimate is this intelligence looking? Legitimate enough to get excited?
BTW, the only thing 4chan is claiming they did is the golden shower story, not any of the actual illegal stuff in the document.
...so? Carl Bernstein makes it substantiated?
Many other news US outlets have "Unsubstantiated Report" in their headline. For example NYT:
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/10/...n-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=0
If you have enough evidence there is nothing stopping you.
640K ought to be enough for anybody.He's trying to convince us that 650k emails couldn't fit onto a single computer? Seriously? What a dunce.
Winter President?
I get that most of GAF finds the idea of religion laughable but there's nothing funny about this post.
I get that most of GAF finds the idea of religion laughable but there's nothing funny about this post.
He's trying to convince us that 650k emails couldn't fit onto a single computer? Seriously? What a dunce.
I get that most of GAF finds the idea of religion laughable but there's nothing funny about this post.
This report claims Trump (Cohen) and Russia were sending money to Romania for the hackers, so FBI/CIA report is wrong or this is.
I get that most of GAF finds the idea of religion laughable but there's nothing funny about this post.
His argument is that his "tech" people say there can't be 650K emails on a laptop? Who are these tech people..
I get that most of GAF finds the idea of religion laughable but there's nothing funny about this post.
I get that most of GAF finds the idea of religion laughable but there's nothing funny about this post.
Re Cohen meeting in Prague: Why do I feel like the strategy for the Trump team if indeed this stuff is true would be to find anything in the report, could be ANY one thing that was wrong and use that to disprove the whole thing? That'd be my strategy anyway, coupled with the Fake News line.
Stump, what are you doing?
I get that most of GAF finds the idea of religion laughable but there's nothing funny about this post.
I get that most of GAF finds the idea of religion laughable but there's nothing funny about this post.
Pro tip to anyone trying to discredit this via Eichenwalt and 4chan
Eichenwalt is an idiot and a nut (650k emails don't fit on a laptop lol) and 4chan is 4chan
too bad that name's taken
Maybe I missed it, but does the report give an exact date? I thought it just said August.
That doesn't make any sense. The piss stuff is part of the overall report. Are they trying to say they actively altered the report and inserted that in, but the rest is legit?
Thats a good symbolism, but I doubt most people can have understood what you mean easily.i thought the comparison was appropriate because:
1) trump frequently and at great length expounds on the influence his father had on him; he was in many senses the golden boy, groomed from early age for success and power. another word for golden boy is "boy king"
2) trump was elected in part thanks to supporters who create hagiographic images of him, including those of him with a halo around his head, and refer to him as a king, emperor, or god
3) trump crassly embraces performative christianity for votes despite not apparently having any sincere engagement with faith; he is ultimately sacrilegious to an extreme. his personal brand is all about mammon, money, excess, and commercialism.
4) this is a thread about how trump likes being dunked in piss (or just watching people piss, it's unclear from context)
5) despite the fact that the real story here is Russian intelligence helping Trump's campaign and attempting to get leverage on him to manipulate him, the sensational distraction is the getting dunked in piss
the artwork piss christ is a statement about the commercialization and commodification of christianity, as well as the hysteria surrounding icons and images. this fits in very well with who trump is, as above. also it's art of jesus being dunked in piss and we don't often have threads about people getting dunked in piss.
to the extent that piss christ was read as provocative and anti-christian, i feel the comparison is directly relevant, because any christian should surely be mortified by the behaviour discussed here; which is the graver threat to christianity? a piece of art that, at worst, disrespects plastic jesus, or a living icon to everything christianity ought guard against?
i actually honestly thought the post and the parallels would be obvious
too bad that name's taken
Perhaps some industrious journalist will make inquiries with Austria. They're the defacto middle man in this equation.Oohhh Italy eh.
Who is to say he didnt go to prague from italy.
HohohohI don't see a California tag there either.
i thought the comparison was appropriate because:
1) trump frequently and at great length expounds on the influence his father had on him; he was in many senses the golden boy, groomed from early age for success and power. another word for golden boy is "boy king"
2) trump was elected in part thanks to supporters who create hagiographic images of him, including those of him with a halo around his head, and refer to him as a king, emperor, or god
3) trump crassly embraces performative christianity for votes despite not apparently having any sincere engagement with faith; he is ultimately sacrilegious to an extreme. his personal brand is all about mammon, money, excess, and commercialism.
4) this is a thread about how trump likes being dunked in piss (or just watching people piss, it's unclear from context)
5) despite the fact that the real story here is Russian intelligence helping Trump's campaign and attempting to get leverage on him to manipulate him, the sensational distraction is the getting dunked in piss
the artwork piss christ is a statement about the commercialization and commodification of christianity, as well as the hysteria surrounding icons and images. this fits in very well with who trump is, as above. also it's art of jesus being dunked in piss and we don't often have threads about people getting dunked in piss.
to the extent that piss christ was read as provocative and anti-christian, i feel the comparison is directly relevant, because any christian should surely be mortified by the behaviour discussed here; which is the graver threat to christianity? a piece of art that, at worst, disrespects plastic jesus, or a living icon to everything christianity ought guard against?
i actually honestly thought the post and the parallels would be obvious
LmaoHope Trump can't sleep tonight so he looks extra shitty tomorrow.
Carl Bernstein on CNN right now. Talking about this.
This is great. Thank you for explaining the finer arts.i thought the comparison was appropriate because:
1) trump frequently and at great length expounds on the influence his father had on him; he was in many senses the golden boy, groomed from early age for success and power. another word for golden boy is "boy king". "anointed" is another word for someone poised and groomed for success.
2) trump was elected in part thanks to supporters who create hagiographic images of him, including those of him with a halo around his head, and refer to him as a king, emperor, or god.
3) trump crassly embraces performative christianity for votes despite not apparently having any sincere engagement with faith; he is ultimately sacrilegious to an extreme. his personal brand is all about mammon, money, excess, and commercialism.
4) this is a thread about how trump likes being dunked in piss (or just watching people piss, it's unclear from context)
5) despite the fact that the real story here is Russian intelligence helping Trump's campaign and attempting to get leverage on him to manipulate him, the sensational distraction is the getting dunked in piss
the artwork piss christ is a statement about the commercialization and commodification of christianity, as well as the hysteria surrounding icons and images. this fits in very well with who trump is, as above. also it's art of jesus being dunked in piss and we don't often have threads about people getting dunked in piss.
to the extent that piss christ was read as provocative and anti-christian, i feel the comparison is directly relevant, because any christian should surely be mortified by the behaviour discussed here; which is the graver threat to christianity? a piece of art that, at worst, disrespects plastic jesus, or a living icon to everything christianity ought guard against?
i actually honestly thought the post and the parallels would be obvious
So, like, if this is true... what are the possible things that could happen?
Hope Trump can't sleep tonight so he looks extra shitty tomorrow.
I bet Reagan liked getting shit on, like a real American.
I get that most of GAF finds the idea of religion laughable but there's nothing funny about this post.
So, like, if this is true... what are the possible things that could happen?
I bet Reagan liked getting shit on, like a real American.