I have a feeling David Cameron doesn't like Mittens very much
That just means he's normal.
I have a feeling David Cameron doesn't like Mittens very much
How is it unfair to level the playing field which affirmative action doesn't even accomplish?
I am actually looking forward to voting for canidate Romney (lets not kid our selves he will not become President).
I do not like how hollywood and Europe backs President Obama. I would rather have a man hated by the EU than one who is beloved like President Obama supposedly is.
Idk... Maybe it is because I empathize more with Romney and his situation (less charismatic/likeable than President Obama).
Why is it though that Europeans on average typically hate republican Presidents or canidates with a firey passion?
If David Axelrod came out and punted a baby I would not blame President Obama for it.
How do we even know the anglo comments are even true?
Its unfair because some disadvantaged people do not get the benefits. Ideally eduacational costs could be lower and we could tax the rich to cover the more affordable eduacation.
Think about this tonight, PoliGAF:
People like LostVoyager are allowed to vote and their vote carries the same weight as yours.
Assuming it isn't under 18
Sweet dreams.
Welcome to Great Britain, the country where they set aside half an hour every week for people to give the Prime Minister shit and judge him on how well he gives it back.
Nothing Romney said was out-of-line or disrespectful. For context, the issue of security and industrial strike affecting the Games has been extensively covered in the British media as of the last few weeks, and recently the South-Korean flag mixup. Romney was only referring to that context, in which he described were 'disconcerting', but crucially, he added that it was "impossible" for errors not to be made in organising in something as large scale as this.
Cameron's response, however, is disrespectful.
Welcome to Great Britain, the country where they set aside half an hour every week for people to give the Prime Minister shit and judge him on how well he gives it back. If you weren't expecting this, then you weren't well-briefed on international politics. Which is fine if you're a NeoGAF poster but somewhat more problematic for a candidate for President of the United States.
I love the Question Time sessions on C-SPAN. I would love if there was something similar in the States but shudder when I start thinking about how it would play out.
Because they would be far-right in our countries.
Calling our ability to "come together" isn't disrespectful(especially considering the obvious undertone), but telling the truth is? Also the problems were already solved by the time he made his comments, so were only going to make him look bad.
The French far right (National Front) regularly get 15+% of the vote and makes the republicans look like a bunch of socialists. Not the best comparison.
President Obama is not that liberal. Plus Romney is not going to win... If people can support President Obama because they like him why can I not support Romney because I empathise with him.And if Obama had a history of surrounding himself with people that punt babies and even catered to the crowd that punted babies you'd still be fine with it?
What I mean is that it is an effort by the Romney campaign to "other-ize" Obama. It's really embarrassing to me that he followed this route, but it seems to be precisely what he's doing. His surrogate, Sununu said that Obama was unAmerican. Romney himself is playing to this whenever he says that Obama doesn't understand America and uses words and phrases like that.
...
But you're Republican and voting for Romney?
My head hurts...
Wtf here I was claiming I was smart... And you have to call me dumb? (Not, I have yet to claim to even being of the average intelligence level in this topic).Think about this tonight, PoliGAF:
People like LostVoyager are allowed to vote and their vote carries the same weight as yours.
Assuming it isn't under 18
Sweet dreams.
I guess I'm not liberal enough to see why that's so offensive.
The Daily Show did a segment about how the London security was a mess. So do all the posters who bashed Romney over this now hate The Daily Show?
It must suck to be so kneejerk.
The French far right (National Front) regularly get 15+% of the vote and makes the republicans look like a bunch of socialists. Not the best comparison.
"European politics" are simply far too diverse to distill down and then make direct comparisons in terms of left/right to the US. What I will say is that two party systems simply cannot be very representative of the people.
The Daily Show did a segment about how the London security was a mess. So do all the posters who bashed Romney over this now hate The Daily Show?
It must suck to be so kneejerk.
Its unfair because some disadvantaged people do not get the benefits. Ideally eduacational costs could be lower and we could tax the rich to cover the more affordable eduacation.
Again I am not anything above the average intelligence level and I do not pretend to be otherwise (waiting for this to be bolded and one of you to go we know, or obviously) but I think it is sad the way our society is structured and what careers are rewarded.
DOES NOT COMPUTEPresident Obama is not that liberal. Plus Romney is not going to win... If people can support President Obama because they like him why can I not support Romney because I empathise with him.
Plus President Obama did not do alot of what he claimed he would so why would I vote for him?
I am not a fan of Hollywood.
Its not as if President Obama is not running a negative campaign... Its generally what happens in arguements. If negative ads did not work I doubt neither would do it. Romney was saying in the debates and in interviews that President Obama was a great guy, etc. etc. they just disagreed. I am sure President Obama has no huge issue with Romney.
Thing is both wings of the parties do not like hearing positive things said about their opponents.
Wtf here I was claiming I was smart... And you have to call me dumb? (Not, I have yet to claim to even being of the average intelligence level in this topic).
Also you all seem to be making a big deal about racism in this topic but alot of intelligence /iq is inherited so that is a form of discrimination along with lookism, heightism in our society that is acceptable. Obstacles always exist in life.
The Daily Show did a segment about how the London security was a mess. So do all the posters who bashed Romney over this now hate The Daily Show?
It must suck to be so kneejerk.
It is not offensive, it is a brilliant gaffe. Romney is having an atrocious foreign trip that was supposed to display his foreign affairs credentials. Armando Iannucci must be having a field day.
The Daily Show did a segment about how the London security was a mess. So do all the posters who bashed Romney over this now hate The Daily Show?
It must suck to be so kneejerk.
You must have missed all the British people complain about the G4S scandal, jesus. If any nation would moan about how bad their own Olympics was going to be, it would be the British.
Well, if I read only the comments below the OP I would have thought he said some pretty vile stuff.
President Obama is not that liberal. Plus Romney is not going to win... If people can support President Obama because they like him why can I not support Romney because I empathise with him.
Plus President Obama did not do alot of what he claimed he would so why would I vote for him?
I am not a fan of Hollywood.
As Jon Stewart himself would say: "you are comparing a comedy show to a man trying to be the leader of the free world?"
Well, if I read only the comments below the OP I would have thought he said some pretty vile stuff. Can't imagine they all had background knowledge of the situation to make their outrage more appropriate.
But according to one poster in this thread it's OK for the British press to criticise the Government but when foreigners do it, they can "fuck off".
So the leader of the free world shouldn't comment on potential security issues at a global event?
You have to be doing some pretty big mental gymnastics to make this a left/right Democrat/Republican issue. It's not. I'm not even voting for Romney. But this is a security issue, and a candidate who managed the Olympics prior should be able to comment.
Damn Utah-GAF, you just gonna take that insult?
I mean I hate Mitt Romney as much as any other intelligent person but as an American I don't like it when people talk shit about one of our states. Mitt needs to respond with "Well obviously a city is going to be busy when it is the only city in the country."
You have to be doing some pretty big mental gymnastics to make this a left/right Democrat/Republican issue. It's not. I'm not even voting for Romney. But this is a security issue, and a candidate who managed the Olympics prior should be able to comment.
in all seriousness, the point of all the kerfuffle is that he's not being diplomatic and 'presidential' on his first trip outside the country as a prez candidate --he's burning bridges when he's supposed to be building them. he should be all 'they're sorting it all out, the games' going to be great' not 'wow didn't know shit was so bad here'
So the leader of the free world shouldn't comment on potential security issues at a global event?
You have to be doing some pretty big mental gymnastics to make this a left/right Democrat/Republican issue. It's not. I'm not even voting for Romney. But this is a security issue, and a candidate who managed the Olympics prior should be able to comment.
So the leader of the free world shouldn't comment on potential security issues at a global event?.
I know, and I've said before he isn't that liberal. I'm not sure why you keep repeating this. It comes off as really weird, considering you're voting for Romney...
You really don't make any sense, honestly. You freely admit to supporting Romney mostly because you empathize with him, and your justification is that other people vote the other way just because? Shouldn't that annoy you enough that you wouldn't vote just because of something silly.
Yeah, Obama didn't do a lot of what he claimed... except that the guy you're voting for will go further in that direction. He'll go further opposite of what Obama originally claimed.
And yeah, Romney probably won't win, but I would personally never ever chance it. He's still got a really good shot, especially with people like you around, apparently...
And WTF does hollywood have to do with it? For someone that doesn't condemn people by association you seem dead set on voting against Obama because Holywood likes him. So, here's how it goes in your mind: Romney adviser says something damning? A OK. Apparently if Axelrod kicked a baby? That's A OK for Obama too. Hollywood likes Obama? FUCK NO MUST VOTE AGAINST!!!
Boris giving his are we ready speech in Hyde Park:
http://youtu.be/BRgh2mOce7Q
Only Boris can give that speech, I know of no other UK politician that can give a speech like that. The crowd love him, London would be a worse place without him!
I guess I'm not liberal enough to see why that's so offensive.
Romney let same sex marriage pass in Massachuessets, Romney raised taxes in MA. Romney stated that he believes in seperation of church and state and is not very religious.
I just can not justify myself to vote for President Obama sorry and I like the image he portrays of our country abroad.
Hollywood claims to be so liberal and to have this moral enlightened artist high ground yet they all cave to their beliefs apparently. Matt Damon is one of the few to express disappointment (and I am not really a fan just saying) but maybe more do I just do not hear about it on the news. The real union so many actors/actresses support the Democrats is the union. Other forms of entertainment like athletes are split.
I just do not appreciate the sort of social bullying to vote for President Obama or you are not "cool".
That is not the reason I am not voting for him though... The performance of the president versus what he claimed he would do as a canidate is why.
Stuff
I don't really understand how people still fall for that charlatan.