• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Rottenwatch: AVATAR (82%)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Was anyone reminded of Panzer Dragoon at all? The appearance of the flying creatures and the bonds between their riders really felt reminiscent of the dragons from PD, and I loved that.
 
LaneDS said:
Was anyone reminded of Panzer Dragoon at all? The appearance of the flying creatures and the bonds between their riders really felt reminiscent of the dragons from PD, and I loved that.
I never played the game. The Orta trailers always interested me. :lol Damn CG trailers.

I want a new game. Any news?
 
LaneDS said:
Was anyone reminded of Panzer Dragoon at all? The appearance of the flying creatures and the bonds between their riders really felt reminiscent of the dragons from PD, and I loved that.

I kept telling my friends this. Zwei is one of my favorite games of all time, and the Banshee moments in Avatar just scream Panzer Dragoon. Love it...
 
DeathNote said:
There has been people posting about similarities with other things for months. Actually years since the scriptment has been in circulation for a while.

It happened in our history. White men did indeed fall in love with Indians. We wanted resources from them. We relocated and killed them unjustly.

I don't really know how noble they were. I know they fought wars with other Indians. And some were scalpers. But I know nature was important to them. They used animals instead of wasted them.

When filmmakers study a tribe in Africa the only way to learn about them is to stay among them. There's people who study old cultures for a living.

I think it's ok to take logical influence and tell it in a new way.

By the way the only way to study animals is to film and stay among them. I think JC felt the thrill of that first hand and it has to be a impassioned feeling.

I wasn't referring to the legend, but the movie itself. It also reminded me a little bit of Ferngully in terms of the world and everything lighting up.

I am sure its been referenced but I wasn't really hyped at all for the movie, I had no interest until I went with friends last night and didn't read this thread at all. The reactions IN the theater were amazing, especially when I'm use to 3D listening to the people freak out just during the first few seconds :lol
 
Saw it tonight. Great visuals and was thoroughly entertained, though for me the story and some of the dialogue felt a little like a patchwork of a dozen other films.
 
lsslave said:
I wasn't referring to the legend, but the movie itself. It also reminded me a little bit of Ferngully in terms of the world and everything lighting up.

I am sure its been referenced but I wasn't really hyped at all for the movie, I had no interest until I went with friends last night and didn't read this thread at all. The reactions IN the theater were amazing, especially when I'm use to 3D listening to the people freak out just during the first few seconds :lol
I haven't seen the Disney movie so I can only refer to the basic plot :/

Yeah there have been people talking about Ferngully. Something I refused to see.
 
DeathNote said:
I never played the game. The Orta trailers always interested me. :lol Damn CG trailers.

I want a new game. Any news?

If you've got a 360, I bet Orta holds up pretty well and you could enjoy it easily without playing the others. And since I doubt we'll ever see a new game in the series (sigh) that'll be your best bet.

The otherworldly creature design of Avatar and that of Panzer Dragoon is a good fit too.

LeMaximilian said:
I kept telling my friends this. Zwei is one of my favorite games of all time, and the Banshee moments in Avatar just scream Panzer Dragoon. Love it...

Definitely glad to see I'm not alone in thinking that. Gave me an extra level of satisfaction on what was already a very satisfying movie.
 
LaneDS said:
If you've got a 360, I bet Orta holds up pretty well and you could enjoy it easily without playing the others. And since I doubt we'll ever see a new game in the series (sigh) that'll be your best bet.

The otherworldly creature design of Avatar and that of Panzer Dragoon is a good fit too.



Definitely glad to see I'm not alone in thinking that. Gave me an extra level of satisfaction on what was already a very satisfying movie.
I don't have a 360 but I plan to get one again eventually.

I completely forgot 360 BC existed.
 
U K Narayan said:
Yeah, I immediately made the Panzer Dragoon connection while watching the film. My little sister did, too. Cool stuff.
If you played the games, It's definitely hard not to see it. :lol
 
There's a difference between a bad story, and a story you've heard before. Despite the knowledge and recognition that this movie was Pocahontas in space, I was on the edge of my seat the nearly the whole time. It wasn't because of the special effects -- it was because I cared about the characters. I wanted to know what was going to happen to Jake and Neytiri and to the Na'vi. For whatever sins committed by re-using a stock story template, the execution of it was nearly flawless. Ironically, Sam Worthington seemed more human to me in his Na'vi scenes than his human ones.

Personally, for the first time ever, I found the 3D aspect of the movie to be more than a gimmick. It's hard to describe. Instead of these artificial planes at different distances and things that fly out of the screen conspiciously that you usually get in 3D movies, I felt like my head (the camera) was actually occupying a position in 3D space most of the time. I felt like I was there. I'd liken it almost to looking at a vista out your window, versus standing outside in it. I want to see more 3D movies like this.

I'm hoping I can convince my mom and brother to go see it with me on Christmas Eve. They're both skeptical of the film from the trailers. Whether they go with me or not, I have to see this again.
 
While I've ignored the unobtanium bit until now... what gets me is less the name but the supposed importance.

If it's really what's supposed to save humanity... then I simply don't see humanity sparing an expense or a care about an unfortunate alien race that stood in the way.

I mean I can definetly see them caring enough to not want to kill them if they can help it... but it these people are standing in the way of our survival, nukes would be brought. Much more than a piddly mercenary force with some unstable commander at the head would be brought in to deal with issue.


I just can't logically reconcile such a technologically superior civilization standing down after getting a bruised nose.

If on the otherhand, it was simply needed for luxuries or something not critical for survival... then no probs.

Anyway. I won't delve into it too much, suffice to say I'll pretend that Unobtainium may be synonymous with oil of the 20th century... important, but really we have alternatives that we're just too lazy or entrenched to embrace right now.
 
To be fair, it was presented as a corporate venture with the military muscle being contracted out or that's how I took it.
 
Zaptruder said:
While I've ignored the unobtanium bit until now... what gets me is less the name but the supposed importance.

If it's really what's supposed to save humanity... then I simply don't see humanity sparing an expense or a care about an unfortunate alien race that stood in the way.

I mean I can definetly see them caring enough to not want to kill them if they can help it... but it these people are standing in the way of our survival, nukes would be brought. Much more than a piddly mercenary force with some unstable commander at the head would be brought in to deal with issue.


I just can't logically reconcile such a technologically superior civilization standing down after getting a bruised nose.

If on the otherhand, it was simply needed for luxuries or something not critical for survival... then no probs.

Anyway. I won't delve into it too much, suffice to say I'll pretend that Unobtainium may be synonymous with oil of the 20th century... important, but really we have alternatives that we're just too lazy or entrenched to embrace right now.

Unobtanium is not 'vital' to the survival of humanity, human's aren't an endangered species in Avatar. It's just incredibly useful, if it was then maybe they would destroy the Na'vi, but I don't think they'd really want to nuke their supply location. What's not clear (maybe it will be once I finish reading the scriptment) is if the Na'vi are the only intelligent aliens ever discovered in the Avatar world. If they are, I can't imagine whatever governments remain on earth would okay the mass slaughter of them.

The oil thing is interesting, this latest war is among the most 'jaded' in recent history, but this plot was in place long before this war, and it's motives may echo the movie, but the movie predates the war. There are no false truths being paid to the humans while the RDA rape Pandora.
 
Saw it again.

When I saw the midnight showing a couple of days ago I thought the movie was kinda crap.

Seeing it again yesterday, I was much more impressed. I'd give it a 9.5/10...which I hate because the story is disappointingly unoriginal. But damnit if this isn't the most impressive film ever. I would seriously go to the theater and see this several times again just for the experience factor. The parts that impressed me are when Jake is just out exploring the world.
I wish the entire film was more of a documentary first person account of Jake being in the avatars body and his exploration of the people and planet. Basically, the movie would have been far better if it were more focused. I really enjoyed seeing Jake go for his first run and get lost.

Without the 3d tech, the movie is a solid 7/10. Words can't explain how disappointing the story is. Seriously, James? You gave me a Ferrari that runs like a Kia.
 
shintoki said:
If you played the games, It's definitely hard not to see it. :lol
Yeah even the bright colors of Avatar's flying creatures reminded me of the forms your dragon could morph into in Saga :lol
 
Gary Whitta said:
Yeah the whole "white man goes native" story is a perennial that's been told time and time again but I don't have a problem with that. FWIW I thought the closest analog to this story-wise was not Dances with Wolves but The Last Samurai (burn-out ex-soldier is brought in as a hired gun to help industrialized military deal with primitive warrior natives, gets captured/rescued by natives, learns natives' ways, falls in love with their culture and the girl, then leads natives in heroic last-stand battle against his former paymasters as they move in to wipe them out).
good one (i never did see Last Samurai)

ps were there any black people in Avatar?
 
Saw this last night, and thought it was really good. The only flaw is the length, and the usual corporate is evil storyline gets old. I give it a 9 out of 10. Best visuals I've seen in a movie.
 
Saw the 3pm session today @ Sydney IMAX. Sold out, the arranged seating wasnt bad, got exactly what I wanted.

Wow. After watching it its like Cinema got upgraded compared from DVD to Blu-Ray. Absolutly unbelievable visual effects coupled with a good story.

Solid 8/10.
 
Watched it a few hours ago and I think it's a great movie. Visually impressive, the locales and the environments were amazingly done; I think it's the best I've seen. I still didn't like the designs of the natives, but it's alright I guess. The story was alright as well, I did like the soundtrack quiet a bit. I really enjoyed the action scenes especially near the end. Great movie 8.5/10.
 
stuburns said:
Unobtanium is not 'vital' to the survival of humanity, human's aren't an endangered species in Avatar. It's just incredibly useful, if it was then maybe they would destroy the Na'vi, but I don't think they'd really want to nuke their supply location. What's not clear (maybe it will be once I finish reading the scriptment) is if the Na'vi are the only intelligent aliens ever discovered in the Avatar world. If they are, I can't imagine whatever governments remain on earth would okay the mass slaughter of them.

The oil thing is interesting, this latest war is among the most 'jaded' in recent history, but this plot was in place long before this war, and it's motives may echo the movie, but the movie predates the war. There are no false truths being paid to the humans while the RDA rape Pandora.

The importance of unobtanium is never really made that clear in the movie. From about a page back there's someone posting a excerpt from what appears to be Cameron's notes on Unobtanium.

i.e. it's required for space travel, and on a planet that is overdeveloped and seemingly out of resources interstellar trade is a necessity for energy and resources...

And isn't there also a line at the end of the movie that mentions how humanity is a dying civilization (without this resource)?
 
Was Jeremy Piven unavailable to play the corporate villain dude or something?

i'm sure this has been brought up before but seriously
 
aznpxdd said:
Saw this earlier today in IMAX3D. Visually stunning, even though the 3D effects weren't that great.
Based on the trends I'm noticing and my own experience, I think this opinion is linked to IMAX's projection methods.

Even at a LieMax, objects seemed to have much less depth than on a RealD screen.
 
Krev said:
Based on the trends I'm noticing and my own experience, I think this opinion is linked to IMAX's projection methods.

Even at a LieMax, objects seemed to have much less depth than on a RealD screen.

No wai!
 
Neverender said:
Was Jeremy Piven unavailable to play the corporate villain dude or something?

i'm sure this has been brought up before but seriously

Oh man... Piven would've been a fantastic corporate villain. And he'd also be able to carry off the hesitantly human moments as well.
 
Scullibundo said:
Well you and me know it, but stuff needs to get reposted here pretty often for it to be noticed.

Anyway, I was pretty surprised by how the 3D didn't look so great at a LieMax even though they're using digital projection. Maybe it's RealD's circular polarizers that make the difference over IMAX's linear polarizers.
 
Krev said:
Well you and me know it, but stuff needs to get reposted here pretty often for it to be noticed.

Anyway, I was pretty surprised by how the 3D didn't look so great at a LieMax even though they're using digital projection. Maybe it's RealD's circular polarizers that make the difference over IMAX's linear polarizers.

I actually don't agree. I thought LieMAX was perfect at Fox Studios. I also found the image a lot sharper than Real D. Mind you I haven't seen AVATAR in Real D, only in IMAX and LieMAX. Going to see it at LieMAX again tomorrow.
 
Maybe it was where I was sitting, but the picture seemed a lot more 'cardboarded'.
The trailers looked alright though.
 
Damn this thread has moved fast since my last post on Friday...

Anyway, I went to see Avatar for the third time in 3 days on Friday and, once again, I enjoyed it more than the first time.
I'm beginning to think that maybe I was just way too tired or grumpy to enjoy it first time around? I really don't know what's happening?!

I read over the 'review' that I posted after my initial viewing, and all of those criticisms still stand, it's just that somehow I'm now able to completely forget them and just become engrossed in the world. I think I enjoyed it so much on my second and third viewings that I'd bump my score from 3/5 to 4/5, although there are too many criticisms for me to give it 5/5.

My girlfriend absolutely loved it as well and said it was one of the best films she's ever seen :lol
She was a little pissed with me when she found out that I'd already seen it twice before we even went to see it, but afterwards she said she can understand why I kept going back to watch it, and she demanded that we book tickets to see it in IMAX.

I have no idea how much I'll appreciate the movie in 2D on my HDTV so I plan on seeing it maybe 2 or 3 more times in the cinema before it ends. It will probably end up being my most watched film in the cinema (simply because I don't think I'll enjoy it anywhere near as much at home).

Has anyone else seem this multiple times yet? How is it holding up for you?
 
NutJobJim said:
Has anyone else seem this multiple times yet? How is it holding up for you?

Twice. Got worse second time because the visuals were no longer a surprising distraction from the terrible everything else.
 
Meier said:
Disagree. I can't remember another movie in history where there hasn't been at least a single scene that just didn't feel right.. not the case here. And that's with literally every scene being full of CG. It's unparalleled. It's the biggest step forward in visual effects since Jurassic Park -- unquestionably.

Agreed. I was actually thinking about this earlier, and WETA has once again usurped the crown from ILM for the time being. ILM was the king from the beginning, and then WETA stile their thunder on LOTR (which seems hilarious NOW, because I dont think LOTR's CG is again well at all), and then ILM took it back on the Pirates sequels and Star Trek, etc. Now with District 9 and especially Avatar, WETA has taken the lead again.

Neytiri has now usurped Davy Jones, who usurped Gollum.

Ball's in your court, ILM.

DMczaf said:
Just got back....all I have to say is:

1znv060.gif

Glad to see you've chosen poorly. Cameron also smacked your lord and savior too though :D

jett said:
There's no hope for Michael Bay. TF3 will be at least as shitty as TF1 and TF2 are. Chance of increased shittyness are high.

This is completely true, but it doesnt matter since Cameron is finally back in the game.

Memles said:

I LOVE that Memles loved this. I figured you might not, but this movie is really winning over some surprising quarters. Somehow, Cameron has done it again.

harSon said:
I personally found Signourny Weaver's character to be the most "realistic" looking, I'm not exactly sure why

Its because her avatar's face was EXACTLY her face, but Navi'd. Whereas Jake's wasnt just Worthington's face. They changed his features.
 
Amir0x said:
Twice. Got worse second time because the visuals were no longer a surprising distraction from the terrible everything else.

See for me it was the complete opposite.
First time around I was so focussed on all the negatives that I wasn't able to really enjoy the visuals.

On the second and third times I was able to just ignore the negatives and focus on the positives.
 
Amir0x said:
Twice. Got worse second time because the visuals were no longer a surprising distraction from the terrible everything else.


surprise surprise..:lol

I can't believe you actually went to see it twice, despite hating it so much. If I didn't like a movie, I wouldnt spend another $15 to see it again.
 
I really want to see it again. I think I'll go by myself after work (I work nights) and catch a morning show to see how a LieMAX experience compares to a real IMAX experience. Hopefully it won't be packed. I was somewhat to the edge at the IMAX show, but was at the very back row. Not too bad.

LieMAX projectors are digital, correct? The IMAX I went to on opening night definitely used film. You could notice dirt on the screen skittering about. It was annoying.
 
Zeliard said:
True. Though, the one thing I'm optimistic about when it comes to something like watching the Avatar Blu-Ray at home is that the colors are MUCH nicer and much more vibrant without the 3D glasses.

If you go see Avatar again, remove your glasses for just a second during some scenes. The difference in saturation is rather huge.

I took them off a couple of times during the Pandoran night scenes and my god. The vibrancy and sheer color on the bioluminescent flora was really a sight to behold. When they get 3D to work without dimming the picture, it's all over.

I agree (I did the same thing too with the glasses). I think it will translate well to a TV. The amazing part of the movie to me are the effects and I think that will be fine

I'm looking forward to the Blu-Ray coming out as I have no intention of buying a 3D TV anytime soon.
 
My girlfriend isn't interested but she really loves Pocahontas (Disney). I'll try to pitch it to her again as Pocahontas in space :lol
 
rhino4evr said:
I can't believe you actually went to see it twice, despite hating it so much. If I didn't like a movie, I wouldnt spend another $15 to see it again.

He obviously liked the movie, but has an e-reputation to maintain. It would be like me saying that The Dark Knight is a piece of shit or that Quantum of Solace is the greatest cinematic achievement of our time.

Zzoram said:
For people who have seen it in 3D and 2D, which is better?

Despite being not completely sold on 3D, for this movie in particular, the answer cant be anything but 3D. It was designed from the ground up for it.
 
Solo said:
He obviously liked the movie, but has an e-reputation to maintain.



Despite being not completely sold on 3D, for this movie in particular, the answer cant be anything but 3D. It was designed from the ground up for it.

Are you saying this having seen it both ways?
 
Zzoram said:
Are you saying this having seen it both ways?

No, Ive only seen it in 3D. I wont even try 2D. Thats why Im not gonna buy the Bluray. Im gonna get my fill theatrically.

Timbuktu said:
Didn't ILM work on Avatar? I remember reading about them coming in and saving the day a while back.

They did. Xia posted a link earlier detailing the stuff they worked on. Neytiri is 100% WETA.
 
I've finally seen it and thought it was a really good film. Visually this is an unparalleled triumph and I think this is meant as a technical showcase first and foremost. The story was good but I though they could have picked up the pace a little during the middle half of the film.

Also,
Cameron missed a huge opportunity to reinforce the implications of what would happen to the human race if we couldn't get at the unobtanium. At the end of the film, I felt this was more of a "natives vs. Corporation and PMC" than a Na'Vi vs. the Human Race film. If they had played with the idea that the human race was dying off and that humans needed this natural resource to survive and prosper I think that would have improved my emotional investment ten-fold. I've seen plenty of movies were "THE MAN" is the bad guy and this felt like another one of those. It never once felt like the HUMAN RACE was the villain of this film and I thought that was what Cameron really wanted you to feel.

Playing up the fact that these people (PMC and the corporation) were just in it for profit instead of survival downplayed the absolute need for this resource. Establish that the humans need that resource or die off and then you have a moral "gray" area that you can play with. That story would have been far more interesting. How far would you go to save your own race?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom