MetalAlien said:Same thing I find wrong with eating an entire gallon of icecream vs eating a single cone.
You're clearly not as fat as I am.
MetalAlien said:Same thing I find wrong with eating an entire gallon of icecream vs eating a single cone.
Amir0x said:There are people who legitimately have reasons to dislike anything. But the reason is NEVER because that something is "popular".
TurtleSnatcher said:BoxOfficeMojo has estimates up
For the weekend its saying 73 million.. (Thats it?)
MetalAlien said:Same thing I find wrong with eating an entire gallon of icecream vs eating a single cone.
I enjoyed District 9 way more than this. :-/Count Dookkake said:Movie is spectacular and I find myself thinking about it often. Might go see again today.
Also, it is nice to see that all my anecdotal estrogen reports have been confirmed as normal.
This movie is going to be huge. I also think it is kind of morbidly funny how it just took a dump on District 9. I mean, that's a nice little film, but Avatar almost guarantees that it will end up being forgotten. There are too many similarities between the two.
Critics have called alien epic Avatar a version of Dances With Wolves because it's about a white guy going native and becoming a great leader. But Avatar is just the latest scifi rehash of an old white guilt fantasy. Spoilers...
Dabookerman said:No of course. But then people tend to swap popular with annoying fanboys/girls. This may or may not be the case with Avatar, but it is for many things. Why the hell would I hate Naruto for example? I don't have any reason, I've never seen it, but the fans make me hate it, and assume it to be shit.
zoukka said:Duh. But the technology itself doesn't improve the other areas of the movie. I'm sure I would've been ecstatic over Avatar as a kid. Just like I was with Toy Story and some Disney flicks.
But I'm a grown person now. I've watched thousands of movies. Avatar had absolutely nothing to offer for me outside the eye-candy. People are just defending the other shitty areas for the sake of... well see console wars etc. Human nature or something *shrug*
StrikerObi said:The studio knows what they are doing with this (for once). Avatar is the kind of flick that needs worth of mouth. Release it a week before one of the biggest movie-going weekends of the year. The word of mouth will get out after the opening weekend and the cinemas will be packed over the holiday. I wouldn't be surprised if they hit $100M next weekend despite being out for a whole week.
cartoon_soldier said:
I'll read it later but just reading the headline I assume this is about races and that old white guild argument. In my opinion Avatar wasn't about that, as a whole. It spoke against destruction of nature in much broader terms with the Na'vi representing a mentality mostly forgotten by highly civilized cultures. It's very open about that but I don't see anything wrong with that message.cartoon_soldier said:
John Dunbar said:I mentioned this before, but not a single movie has ever increased on its second weekend that had over 43 million opening weekend. With the competition next week, Avatar hitting 100 million is a pipe dream.
MetalAlien said:My mouth hurts from having to stretch so wide to swallow the message of this movie. I think we got your point Mr Cameron. Trees are good, we are not.
I don't think he has a problem with the level of the plot/storytelling, just with people trying to raise it to levels above what it is.duckroll said:Or maybe for a lot of people, there's nothing wrong with Disney story telling? Not everything has to be complicated, adult and ambiguous to be good. I still enjoy Pixar movies, I watched Sleeping Beauty on blu-ray again when it was finally released, Lion King is still one of my favorite movies, and I never fail to catch a new Ghibli movie out in the cinemas. That doesn't mean I'm not a grown person who hasn't watched a shitload of movies, nor does it mean I cannot appreciate something more complicated and mature.
Or maybe for a lot of people, there's nothing wrong with Disney story telling? Not everything has to be complicated, adult and ambiguous to be good.
JGS said:Parker is that you?
Maybe it is more. I heard several people call it "more than just a movie" and it makes sense. Actually one of my friends was not only blown away, he was nearly shocked by the experience. He had no real words and didn't even try to find them. I noticed that with many people around me.XiaNaphryz said:I don't think he has a problem with the level of the plot/storytelling, just with people trying to raise it to levels above what it is.
he got back from Pandora pretty fast:lolJGS said:![]()
Parker is that you?
I'm inclined to agree. It gives more depth to everything, but that's about it, and I don't really care about such a feature when it comes to movies.dem said:The movie made me conclude that i really don't give a shit about 3d.
It adds nothing..
zoukka said:This movie is instantly forgotten when the next huge special effects galore hits.
Oneself said:I'm amazed by all the negativity flying around here :lol
Even if Avatar is cliché, I enjoyed every single minute of it. It's way better than 95% of the big budjet releases and nostalgia filled classic praised crap like, let's say, Star Wars.
zoukka said:Yeah the flow of the movie was solid. The content, rotten. Was this movie aimed at kids? I thought it was R13. And it has nothing in common with Ghibli movies.
It's always the same in these kinds of arguments. "You can't appreciate mindless fun" etc... and that's bullshit. Everyone can appreciate casual, campy and just plain fun. But these kind of movies have standards too you know. Nowadays it's just harder to see all the shite under the ever-developing digital magix.
This movie is instantly forgotten when the next huge special effects galore hits.
Well, I'll admit I still have a soft spot for the classic Star Wars trilogy, but in terms of today's big-budget action romps with ridiculous amounts of CG, there aren't many good movies out there of the type. For Avatar to come out on top or near the top really isn't saying much at all.Oneself said:Even if Avatar is cliché, I enjoyed every single minute of it. It's way better than 95% of the big budjet releases and nostalgia filled classic praised crap like, let's say, Star Wars.
Amir0x said:Your argument is that Microsoft and Sony fans hate Mario and Zelda. That's your argument, your real serious argument. And that after some undefined period of time, the collective "haters" suddenly agree that it's ok to like these things again.
That's your real fucking serious argument.
You see, as I always say, fanboys of various movies and games and consoles don't have logic. When they like something, they have to believe that people who don't enjoy it like them are doing so by some ulterior motives. It's more religion and faith than reason. It's a burning necessity to have their viewpoints validated by the masses and their peers, and if not they must create these scenarios where people are unfairly judging these products for something as absurd as "popularity."
If you said to someone "most people who hate X don't like it because it's popular", any person who graduated further than the fourth grade would know only a retard would legitimately think that was true. But if you say it in the context of a circle jerk, people might be inclined to agree... "sure, of course, that makes sense! POPULARITY did it, you see." No different than a cult.
There are people who legitimately have reasons to dislike anything. But the reason is NEVER because that something is "popular".
Rash said:Well, I'll admit I still have a soft spot for the classic Star Wars trilogy, but in terms of today's big-budget action romps with ridiculous amounts of CG, there aren't many good movies out there of the type.
Rash said:I honestly think Avatar would've served better as two or three separate movies instead of one, because at least then we'd have some interesting progressive development of the story and characters.
I can say I agree with this too. Hell, movies at the theater are still wowing me just with digital projection. I really don't need 3D just yet.Hamfam said:Those 3D glasses darken the screen and get misty / dirty quite easilly...I think I'd have preferred just watching it in 2D and having the brighter / sharper screen.
J2 Cool said:75mil opener, already have my total estimates from earlier thread.
I was under the impression that most projectors run at 70% brightness, so they increase it a bit for 3D movies. So you're actually not getting a dimmer experience. I could be wrong though.Hamfam said:Those 3D glasses darken the screen and get misty / dirty quite easilly...I think I'd have preferred just watching it in 2D and having the brighter / sharper screen.
lsslave said:You're wrong in that Ami, trust me. People literally will go into things, especially popular things, wanting to hate it to begin with. If you go into something wanting to hate it then you instantly will.
You see this a lot in Wii Music, and while some people can genuinely dislike something other people plan to hate something long before they see it.
DieNgamers said:I'll read it later but just reading the headline I assume this is about races and that old white guild argument. In my opinion Avatar wasn't about that, as a whole. It spoke against destruction of nature in much broader terms with the Na'vi representing a mentality mostly forgotten by highly civilized cultures. It's very open about that but I don't see anything wrong with that message.
:lol :lol :lol :StrikerObi said:The word of mouth will get out after the opening weekend and the cinemas will be packed over the holiday. I wouldn't be surprised if they hit $100M next weekend despite being out for a whole week.
Rash said:I honestly think Avatar would've served better as two or three separate movies instead of one, because at least then there'd be more time for interesting progressive development of the story and characters.
I largely agree, but I think the move to make not something STRICTLY about survival was deliberate. I think they wanted to avoid the grey area. Keep it black and white - these are the good guys, these are the bad guys. For sure, a moral grey area is that much more interesting, but I reckon it was something they didn't really want. But as you say, it kind of plays out a little bit strange - as the Colonel briefs the soldiers before the big attack, all the humans are basically fist-pumping (in parallel with the na'vi - but they had a reason to defend their land) - what are they all excited about? That they are going to destroy a tree? Thousands of indigenous people? They needed to show that the marines were perhaps tired of the situation or something. I know it's the exact point, but I do find it a little hard to believe that the motivation of the human race will STILL be greed and money after all that's said and done in however many years in the future it is. Then again, maybe that's the point to all of it- that after all that tech, discovery of new worlds that the same things happen every time.DoctorWho said:I've finally seen it and thought it was a really good film. Visually this is an unparalleled triumph and I think this is meant as a technical showcase first and foremost. The story was good but I though they could have picked up the pace a little during the middle half of the film.
Also,Cameron missed a huge opportunity to reinforce the implications of what would happen to the human race if we couldn't get at the unobtanium. At the end of the film, I felt this was more of a "natives vs. Corporation and PMC" than a Na'Vi vs. the Human Race film. If they had played with the idea that the human race was dying off and that humans needed this natural resource to survive and prosper I think that would have improved my emotional investment ten-fold. I've seen plenty of movies were "THE MAN" is the bad guy and this felt like another one of those. It never once felt like the HUMAN RACE was the villain of this film and I thought that was what Cameron really wanted you to feel.
Playing up the fact that these people (PMC and the corporation) were just in it for profit instead of survival downplayed the absolute need for this resource. Establish that the humans need that resource or die off and then you have a moral "gray" area that you can play with. That story would have been far more interesting. How far would you go to save your own race?
Not really. District 9 is far and beyond a better movie with better writing and a better story and only outclassed visually in 3D. :lolCount Dookkake said:Movie is spectacular and I find myself thinking about it often. Might go see again today.
Also, it is nice to see that all my anecdotal estrogen reports have been confirmed as normal.
This movie is going to be huge. I also think it is kind of morbidly funny how it just took a dump on District 9. I mean, that's a nice little film, but Avatar almost guarantees that it will end up being forgotten. There are too many similarities between the two.
duckroll said:That doesn't mean you're wrong, just different. Are you unable to accept that?
zoukka said:Whooppee-doo nobodys wrong, everyone's right! Free love for all humanity.
I mean I thought it was a trashy movie, and anyone who liked it, has bad taste. There's no deep hate or bitterness behind it. I saw it free too, so I wasn't even pissed afterwards.
lsslave said:You're wrong in that Ami, trust me. People literally will go into things, especially popular things, wanting to hate it to begin with. If you go into something wanting to hate it then you instantly will.
You see this a lot in music, and while some people can genuinely dislike something other people plan to hate something long before they see it.
zoukka said:Whooppee-doo nobodys wrong, everyone's right! Free love for all humanity.
I mean I thought it was a trashy movie, and anyone who liked it, has bad taste. There's no deep hate or bitterness behind it. I saw it free too, so I wasn't even pissed afterwards.