No disassemble 3D camera!mckmas8808 said:![]()
http://money.cnn.com/2010/01/05/technology/3d_tv/index.htm
WOW doesn't that camera look similar to the one James Cameron used?
Fake edit: gah, beaten.
No disassemble 3D camera!mckmas8808 said:![]()
http://money.cnn.com/2010/01/05/technology/3d_tv/index.htm
WOW doesn't that camera look similar to the one James Cameron used?
Really? So you're predicting a $57.8 million weekend? Keep in mind that the last two weekends have included holidays (Christmas and New Year's Day) and the next holiday weekend isn't until MLK Day weekend. Obviously it's not completely out of the question, since after its Monday drop Avatar really isn't tracking like any other movie, but it seems a bit overoptimistic to me.GhaleonEB said:FWIW, I don't recall forecasting Monday that specifically, but if I did it was really, realy stupid.![]()
My predictions from a week ago or so for weekly drops was just that - weekly drops, based on the first (and then second) seven day performance (Fri-Thurs).
To test how that holds up, take Monday's performance and project. Yesterday was 50% off the previous Monday. So cut last week's Monday-Thursday figure in half (adjusting for the holiday last Thursday). Now put the weekend take down, say, 15%. That's a 33% drop for the week overall.
That's the kind of scenario I was trying to describe, which is what Avatar is tracking to with Monday's number.
Looks like with Monday's take it jumped Jurassic Park domestically. Next stop, Jesus.
To be clear it was an illustration of what would need to happen for it to hit my earlier prediction; I think it has a shot that kind of weekend. It may also be a touch aggressive, but I'd be surprised if it dropped more than 20-25% the way it's tracking.Sharp said:Really? So you're predicting a $57.8 million weekend? Keep in mind that the last two weekends have included holidays (Christmas and New Year's Day) and the next holiday weekend isn't until MLK Day weekend. Obviously it's not completely out of the question, since after its Monday drop Avatar really isn't tracking like any other movie, but it seems a bit overoptimistic to me.
Jake is supposed to be a professional and a marine. He's there for a job. I found that scene to be a bit off, too.gdt5016 said:I don't think so. I had a cast on for months, when it finally came off I literally ran around the block. Not being able to move is a terrible thing.
Not enough!Solo said:$8M? Very nice!.
Count Dookkake said:Not sure why a cultural shout-out is offensive.
Regardless, I was more talking about how Cameron made the biggest-budgeted movie about interspecies romance and hid it under CG. Pretty neat trick, IMO.
I refuse to believe this :lolKibbles said:there were people applauding after Spider-Man 3? What teh fuckz.
Rentahamster said:Jake is supposed to be a professional and a marine. He's there for a job. I found that scene to be a bit off, too.
I'm not sure what it speaks of about the man who just gets new legs and is about to jeopardize them immediately by not listening to shouts of "we need to do some tests first", and "stop you might hurt yourself".
I think I would have preferred a more subtle approach to that scene.
Rentahamster said:I refuse to believe this :lol
That makes for $29.7m yesterday internationally, $37.8m including the US. Absurd numbers for any Monday, much less #3.DarkMehm said:Domestic: $360,209,452 33.9%
+ Foreign: $702,942,307 66.1%
= Worldwide: $1,063,151,759
He's a professional soldier being paid a lot of money to do a very important job critical for the survival of the human race.JGS said:I'm not sure what gave the impression he was a professional.
Because she's a smarty pants scientist and Jake's a dumb jarhead. Or something.JGS said:He was being insulted by Grace as soon as she saw him!
He does things for himself (like the scene where he refuses Grace's help to get into the avatar pod) to show how he's overcome his disability and refuses to let it keep him down. I'm not sure what earlier scenes your are referring to that show Jake does not take orders too well.JGS said:Jake does not appear to be a subtle kind of guy. The earlier scenes also showed he does not take orders too well and that he likes doing things for himself.
Yeah, you might hurt yourself in combat, risking your life in order to complete an objective. This doesn't mean you go joyriding in a completely foreign body at great risk to yourself, others, and a lot of expensive equipment.JGS said:Being a Marine means by default you might hurt yourself due to the job. He's a risk taker.
He doesn't know his body at all. It's a completely new body from a different species. Of course the test takers are looking at it from an investment/liability standpoint. They also don't want Jake to hurt his new bajillion dollar irreplaceable Na'vi body or the other scientists around him.JGS said:It made perfect sense to me. He knows his body better than the test takers who may have been looking at it from an investment/liability standpoint.
Yeah, but that's his job. That's what he's paid lots of money to do on this incredibly important mission. Totally unprofessional.WickedAngel said:He had just went from being a paraplegic to being a Na'vi. The transition would overwhelm most people under normal conditions (Given that the Na'vi have athletic abilities far superior to our own).
The last thing I would want to do after making that transition was play the role of guinea pig to some lab technician.
Dead said:I dont think the mission as something that is vital to the human race at all.
It will provide advances in tech and what not, but it is a pretty much for the profit project.
Fuck, THIS close for my prediction to be right...3. Dead Man's Chest $1,066,179,725
4. Avatar $1,063,151,759
Oh, it's pretty vital.Dead said:I dont think the mission as something that is vital to the human race at all.
It will provide advances in tech and what not, but it is a pretty much for the profit project.
mckmas8808 said:![]()
http://money.cnn.com/2010/01/05/technology/3d_tv/index.htm
WOW doesn't that camera look similar to the one James Cameron used?
Yeah, I think since it's a corporation and not a nation/nations doing the mining, I think that's likely. I got the impression it was basically a giant energy company, ala Exon-Mobile, and they were the only ones with enough money to go out there and set up the operations. Basically (really, really) offshore drilling.demosthenes said:Yea, they wouldn't have been talking about money so much if the human race depended so much on this ore.
I especially like the scene when Jake starts running through the garden. The music kicks in - and you get this wonderful feeling in your gut. He's free.Bit-Bit said:Jake wiggling his feet followed by shots of him stepping on the ground. It was all very well done. I think this scene actually means a whole lot more the more times you've seen the movie. I know I got something different out of it every time.
FirewalkR said:The international box-office numbers are incredible. This update was just for Monday right? It was way above the previous int/us ratio of slightly less than 2.
GhaleonEB said:Yeah, I think since it's a corporation and not a nation/nations doing the mining, I think that's likely. I got the impression it was basically a giant energy company, ala Exon-Mobile, and they were the only ones with enough money to go out there and set up the operations. Basically (really, really) offshore drilling.
pandorapedia said:Only the great need for unobtanium and the energy which it allows human civilization to produce could justify the cost of creating these vessels. In fact, the unobtanium itself enabled the creation of this class of ISVs. It is used in the superconducting magnet arrays which contain and direct the energy of the matter-antimatter annihilation which propels the ship. Without unobtanium, interstellar commerce on this scale would not be possible. Unobtanium is not only the key to Earths energy needs in the 22nd century, but it is the enabler of interstellar travel and the establishment of a truly spacefaring civilization.
Snowman Prophet of Doom said:According to the Pandorapdia, unobtainium is the substance around the which the economy of future-Earth is built. It's pretty fucking important.
It's also good for demonstrating how natually Jake fit into his Avatar body. While he's warming up for a sprint, you can see Norm staggering around like a drunken sailor in the background, trying to catch up. It's a great scene on every level.I especially like the scene when Jake starts running through the garden. The music kicks in - and you get this wonderful feeling in your gut. He's free.
Makes me tear up a bit.
Yup, just Monday. The weekend was revised up $7m yesterday.FirewalkR said:The international box-office numbers are incredible. This update was just for Monday right? It was way above the previous int/us ratio of slightly less than 2.
I haven't read that stuff, so I was just describing how it was portrayed in the movie. Though the survival guide (and soundtrack, OMG) just arrived, so hopefully that goes into it.Rentahamster said:There's no national representation because as far as I can tell, no nation invested the proper resources or research into interstellar space travel. That's why the RDA has to work under authorization from the ICA.
Yesterday around mid-day they revised the overseas figure up to $673.jett said:I remember that the overseas total numbers during the weekend were estimated at 666 million, actuals climbed up to 702 today.
jett said:I remember that the overseas total numbers during the weekend were estimated at 666 million, actuals climbed up to 702 today.
Explains why Jake would be jaded as to whether or not RDA was really working for the "benefit of mankind"The Earth scenes that got cut out were still super brief and really only reinforced classism and horrible environmental conditions, that everyone had basically accepted, to the point where breathing masks had become fashion items, etc. more Blade Runner than anything else. The planet is just screwed and no one was really inclined to change it, least of all the rich people on top of everything, which is who the corp was really there for.
mckmas8808 said:Brace yourself! 3-D entertainment is coming to a television set near you.
Both ESPN and Discovery Communications announced Tuesday that they will launch 3-D TV networks. ESPN will start airing its 3-D sports network in June, while Discovery Communications did not specify when it would begin airing 3-D content.
3-D entertainment has been gaining in popularity, most notably with the release of the 3-D film "Avatar," showing in theaters now.
ESPN's new network, to be named ESPN 3D, will air at least 85 live sporting events in its first year. The first 3-D event will be the FIFA World Cup between South Africa and Mexico on June 11.
"ESPN's commitment to 3-D is a win for fans and our business partners," the sports network said in a statement. "ESPN 3D marries great content with new technology to enhance the fan's viewing experience and puts ESPN at the forefront of the next big advance for TV viewing."
The sports network said it has had "productive discussions" with cable and satellite affiliates, and it believes many will sign on.
Demand for more realistic sports programming was one of the main motivators for affiliates to offer high definition broadcasting and for consumers to buy HD TV sets. Likewise, ESPN believes that there is the same type of strong demand for 3-D sports entertainment.
To view the 3-D channels, customers will have to buy a special 3D-HDTV set, which are currently available from most manufacturers. Discovery said it hopes that its network drives consumer adoption of 3-D televisions.
Although ESPN 3D will only air during specific live events, Discovery's new channel will be the nation's first 24/7 3-D network.
Discovery Communications, which owns the Discovery Channel and TLC among other cable channels, partnered with Sony and IMAX to develop the new 3-D station.
"By partnering with Sony and IMAX on 3-D, Discovery will lead the way in revolutionizing the next-generation home viewing experience in the U.S. and around the world," said Discovery Communications CEO David Zaslav in a statement.
The 3-D Discovery network will show natural history, space, science and technology programming as well as movies. Discovery will provide the content, Sony will advertise and license 3-D films, and IMAX will license movies and the technology for the venture
Onix said:I'm interested ... and confused by this news.
Are there any sources that explain the details of the tech involved in this? If it's to utilize the upcoming 3-D TV's, I'm confused how the broadcasting will work?
jett said:I dunno about the 3D broadcasting standard(i'm not sure if there is any), but the blu-ray standard is meant to work with any type of TV, and every type of 3D system. 3D displays come with glasses, so I assume you'll need 3d glasses of some sort for this.
Onix said:I'm interested ... and confused by this news.
Are there any sources that explain the details of the tech involved in this? If it's to utilize the upcoming 3-D TV's, I'm confused how the broadcasting will work?
You can do 3D with 60fps, but the ghosting is more apparent, and it doesn't look all that great.Onix said:By any TV, you mean any type of 3-D TV, that happens to be using the new standards
To my knowledge, it requires 120Hz. I don't think ATSC supports that, and neither does sat/cable.
That's where the confusion comes from![]()
Rentahamster said:You can do 3D with 60fps, but the ghosting is more apparent, and it doesn't look all that great.
The ghosting is a problem when trying to hack 3D games to work with 60hz monitors. The flicker, eye strain, and headaches goes without saying.Onix said:It's not an issue of ghosting.
Nearly all TV's being released next year are shutter-based. 60fps using alternating eyes is nearly unusable for an sort of extended period of time. The flicker is visibly noticeable, and cause major eye-strain if not headaches.
Rentahamster said:He's a professional soldier being paid a lot of money to do a very important job critical for the survival of the human race.
Rentahamster said:He does things for himself (like the scene where he refuses Grace's help to get into the avatar pod) to show how he's overcome his disability and refuses to let it keep him down. I'm not sure what earlier scenes your are referring to that show Jake does not take orders too well.
Rentahamster said:Yeah, you might hurt yourself in combat, risking your life in order to complete an objective. This doesn't mean you go joyriding in a completely foreign body at great risk to yourself, others, and a lot of expensive equipment.
Rentahamster said:He doesn't know his body at all. It's a completely new body from a different species. Of course the test takers are looking at it from an investment/liability standpoint. They also don't want Jake to hurt his new bajillion dollar irreplaceable Na'vi body or the other scientists around him.
Rentahamster said:Look, I know that the scene is supposed to show Jake overcome with joy at the sensation of his new legs and running around going "whee!" against all common sense. The delivery is just kinda odd, and I don't think it reflects positively on his character.
Rentahamster said:Yeah, but that's his job. That's what he's paid lots of money to do on this incredibly important mission. Totally unprofessional.
Hold everything HDMI 1.3 gear will work with 3D
However, as with all things, there's a catch. Keep reading to see what you'll be giving up.
Unfortunately, you'll still need a new HDMI 1.4-enabled 3D HDTV to see the 3D effect. It's necessary because those HDTVs have dual-scanning capabilities: They can display near-simultaneous frames, one for each eye, to create the 3D illusion. Current HDTVs are only single-scan.
And you won't get full 1080p 3D via an upgraded HDMI 1.3 box, either just half or quarter resolution, depending on the source. HDMI 1.3 isn't powerful enough to stream near-simultaneous 1080p frames. From a full 1080p source such as Blu-ray or a satellite receiver, you'll instead get dual 1080i images to create 3D; from a cable box, you'll get dual 540i images. I've been told the difference between full 1080p 3D and 540i 3D is essentially the difference between Blu-ray and DVD, which for most people is not that big of a difference. I still think you'll want at least a 65-inch 3D HDTV, though, to really get an immersive 3D experience.
The HDMI 1.4 spec concentrates on three formats for 3D: 720p50, 720p60 and 1080p24, for european and american video material, and movies, respectively. The 3D versions of these formats can be fully supported by any HDMI 1.3 cable that supports 1080p60. There might be limitations in some HDMI 1.3 chipsets and media processors that exclude one or more formats, but the bandwidth of HDMI 1.3 is capable of supporting them all.
Supporting 1080p60 as a 3D format is a different story. This requires a pixel clock of almost 300 MHz, while most HDMI 1.3 (and almost all early HDMI 1.4) chips top out at about 220 MHz. So, don't expect to see too many 3D devices that support 1080p60, most will only support 1080p24.
Now, there is no "540i" format. There are 3D formats that interleave half the lines from each, the left and right image into one normal sized frame, effectively leaving 540 lines from the 1080 lines of each image. This kind of "line alternative" 3D format is supported by some 3D LCD TVs already, in particule those that have been retrofitted with special filter sheets (e.g. RealD makes those). This kind of line-interlaved format could be already encoded on the disc, since it used the standard timings, but it would not be compatible with 2D playback. This is not an ideal solution, since it jettisons half the resolution from the get-go.
A 3D HDTV must display images at a rate of at least 240 Hz, for example. Some current sets can already do that, but they lack the circuitry to combine the separate video streams that are used to trick our eyes into seeing a three-dimensional picture.
Gallbaro said:No point in buying any electronic device anymore, you will be outmoded within 6 years time anyway.
Before HDTV, it use to be you owned a TV for a decade+.