Guys, a little suggestion about posting rumours from non-major sites:
Don't.
"But I have no way of knowing if they're real or fake" DON'T POST THEM
"It looks pretty convincing to me" TOO BAD DON'T POST IT
"But Go Nintendo ran it" TOO BAD DON'T POST IT
"This blog has broken a scoop before" TOO BAD DON'T POST IT
"I'm 99% sure it's real" TOO BAD DON'T POST IT
"But I'm pretty sure it could make for good discussion" TOO BAD DON'T POST IT
This isn't brain surgery. If you're not absolutely, positively, 100% sure that what you're posting is real, don't post it. People constantly ask us to ban stupid no-name blogs; no one would have to ban anything if people just used a few brain cells.
If you want to post an idea you have, feel free to do so. If you want to pass along someone else's speculation, feel free to do so. If you want to post something specifically because you know it's bullshit and you want to laugh at the rubes that are getting duped, feel free. Mark it clearly as such.
But if you're making or passing along a factual claim, even if you label it as a rumour, know that your reputation is on the line.
It's in the stickied thread:
"If you're reading a HUGE rumour ("Nintendo going third party") from some random Blog you've never heard of, use some common sense. If you don't believe the rumour yourself, don't post it. Posting something obviously crazy and calling it a rumour is not a defence."
"Don't post comedy news as real news, don't post rickrolls, don't post rumours as facts, don't post things you don't believe just because another site posted them, try to find legitimate sources."
It's in the TOS:
"If the forum administrators perceive you as ... making unsubstantiated comments in an attempt to provoke the community, actions may be taken by the administrators."