Ridleyscott
Banned
AceBandage said:Why are you a horrible person?
The devil makes me do it..., and I have to call things like I see them.
AceBandage said:Why are you a horrible person?
Extremely unlikely because AMD is not gonna act like a bitch to a partner who will order 10s of millions of chips.AceBandage said:Eh, don't really buy that either...
Again, we'll see.
wsippel said:POWER6 and POWER7 are clocked at up to 5 and 4.25GHz, respectively. Not to mention POWER7 is out-of-order - I'm sure Nintendo would like that.
From what little I know about R700 architecture, it would be difficult for the GPU not to outperform Xenos and RSX by a considerable margin. They would likely take a mid-range GPU and modify it a bit, and revamped implies improvement rather than underclocking.Pyrokai said:Even the newest IGN one? I really don't know anything about this stuff, but they said "revamped version of AMD's R700 GPU architecture". What does that mean?
Vagabundo said:
Instro said:I dunno that doesnt sound right. AMD stipulating what tech one of their biggest customers can and cant use seems a bit odd. Either theres a legit reason for using the r700 series over something from the 5xxx line( I cant think of any but maybe someone with better tech knowledge can), or these rumors are either wrong or based off old dev kits.
Hopefully it will look like an early 90's product as well Well, not too much, but enough that I know it's a gaming machine and not some external hard drive that looks good on a bookshelf. I've already cleared a space for this thing. How sad.AceBandage said:Stream is definitely something I'd expect an early 90s product to be named...
Which is perfect.
Andrex said:So how do you think these rumors are leaking out?
I've been imagining like, a Nintendo spokesperson is going to devs and doing a Powerpoint presentation on the platform. That's the only way we could be getting details this specific.
Andrex said:So how do you think these rumors are leaking out?
I've been imagining like, a Nintendo spokesperson is going to devs and doing a Powerpoint presentation on the platform. That's the only way we could be getting details this specific.
Andrex said:So how do you think these rumors are leaking out?
I've been imagining like, a Nintendo spokesperson is going to devs and doing a Powerpoint presentation on the platform. That's the only way we could be getting details this specific.
Andrex said:So how do you think these rumors are leaking out?
I've been imagining like, a Nintendo spokesperson is going to devs and doing a Powerpoint presentation on the platform. That's the only way we could be getting details this specific.
Instro said:I dunno that doesnt sound right. AMD stipulating what tech one of their biggest customers can and cant use seems a bit odd. Either theres a legit reason for using the r700 series over something from the 5xxx line( I cant think of any but maybe someone with better tech knowledge can), or these rumors are either wrong or based off old dev kits.
This. When was the last time any of us were this involved with the Wii brand? By controlling the leaks themselves, Nintendo can maintain interest in the brand leading into E3. They'll leave little bread crumbs for us the entire time and we'll never figure it out because of the rumor mill.Plinko said:Nintendo is doing it themselves. Perfect timing--bad Wii sales, disappointing 3DS sales, and E3 coming up.
Wouldn't surprise me.Plinko said:Nintendo is doing it themselves. Perfect timing--bad Wii sales, disappointing 3DS sales, and E3 coming up.
Plinko said:Nintendo is doing it themselves. Perfect timing--bad Wii sales, disappointing 3DS sales, and E3 coming up.
Father_Brain said:Plausible, but I wonder why these leaks are only coming from Western sources.
Instro said:I dunno that doesnt sound right. AMD stipulating what tech one of their biggest customers can and cant use seems a bit odd. Either theres a legit reason for using the r700 series over something from the 5xxx line( I cant think of any but maybe someone with better tech knowledge can), or these rumors are either wrong or based off old dev kits.
AceBandage said:I don't see it going above $300, personally.
But, we'll see.
My very first guess was that, because devs have had kits for "months", it was leaking that way. It's likely that a bunch of journos were sitting on bits of information here and there that was all hush hush and not very accurate. Then one day Game Informer ran a story and everyone else started talking about what they knew already.Andrex said:So how do you think these rumors are leaking out?
I've been imagining like, a Nintendo spokesperson is going to devs and doing a Powerpoint presentation on the platform. That's the only way we could be getting details this specific.
McHuj said:My guess is that the 5xxx line added features to their architecture that Nintendo doesn't see as necessary. For example, the 5xxx series has much better support for OpenCL applications. That stuff adds transistor count (thus cost). There are probably other things as well.
Nintendo may be just looking at it from the point of view of what gives them the most gaming bang for the least (in terms of chip size/transistor count). That's why I think a 4xxx series maybe good enough for them.
thefro said:I like that idea a lot, but it'd have to have a mechanism to lock into place so that when you touch the screen it doesn't move.
Nintendo usually doesn't get details or devkits to western devs, especially French developers I'll leave unnamed, this early. Scuttlebutt gets around faster when everyone's speaking english and talking during, say, GDC.Andrex said:So how do you think these rumors are leaking out?
I've been imagining like, a Nintendo spokesperson is going to devs and doing a Powerpoint presentation on the platform. That's the only way we could be getting details this specific.
AceBandage said:Except that it really wouldn't cost more, and it would use less wattage, which is another big thing for Nintendo.
From The Dust said:would an older architecture with some modern customizations cost as much as a more recent architecture with said customizations built in?
Retro said:http://i.imgur.com/IpbqY.jpg[IMG]
(Reposting mockup from previous page so people know what we're talking about)
Right, but I don't foresee anyone JABBING the screen, so... in theory, if the rear screen's locking mechanism is just a little more tenacious than, say, the regular DS screen, you could tap it and it wouldn't go flying.
Maybe another option is having the screen lock in either up or down, and there's a little tab you have to press for the hinge to swivel free.[/QUOTE]
now you have to keep people from cracking the screen. good luck homie
We don't know what kind of customization was done. It's possible that whatever they did took years to complete and was different from what AMD wanted for PC GPUs, in which case the outcome is perfectly understandable. They didn't go to AMD yesterday and ordered a bunch of GPUs, they possibly approached AMD a few years ago to customize a GPU, and AMD used the most cutting edge tech they had back then.From The Dust said:would an older architecture with some modern customizations cost as much as a more recent architecture with said customizations built in?
From The Dust said:now you have to keep people from cracking the screen. good luck homie
Hobbun said:I don't see anything mentioned in the OP (unless I missed it) about being able to somehow transfer over or redownload (for free) your VC/WiiWare games.
Although if the system is only BC for Wii games and not for GC, it may not matter anyways. At least for me, as I would want access to my GC games and may need to keep my Wii up and going.
...why did you expect specific details about account transfer in a thread about vague rumors concerning the next hardware cycle?Hobbun said:I don't see anything mentioned in the OP (unless I missed it) about being able to somehow transfer over or redownload (for free) your VC/WiiWare games.
Retro said:Eh, I said it was an idea, not an awesome idea. Just a thought I had I felt like sharing, not like anything else is going on in this thread but the same discussions from two days ago.
MYE said:I completely fail to see what a modernized, disc-based version of a SNES would look like.
Woffls said:From what little I know about R700 architecture, it would be difficult for the GPU not to outperform Xenos and RSX by a considerable margin. They would likely take a mid-range GPU and modify it a bit, and revamped implies improvement rather than underclocking.
The CPU bit could mean anything really. All they're doing is stating that they think it's a similar architecture to 360, so that it's familiar to developers. I don't think their intent was to give any indication of performance beyond that. Again, beating Xbox 360 in terms of processing power shouldn't be much of a challenge for Nintendo in 2011.
At the moment, I'm inclined to believe that it will be "significantly" more powerful than the current competition, but talking about specs is boring.
The name is interesting, and is exactly the kind of thing I thought they'd come up with. Something vague enough that it could imply practically anything, but makes complete sense when you know Nintendo's intentions behind the console. My first thought was actually a stream of water, which could mean a bunch of things.
A.KU.MU said:IMAGE
Door2Dawn said:Wait, THIS year?
ShockingAlberto said:...why did you expect specific details about account transfer in a thread about vague rumors concerning the next hardware cycle?
R700 does tessellation. It might be considered a D3D12 feature, but that doesn't mean it's exclusive to D3D12 compliant GPUs.Cow Mengde said:It would be nice to have Tessellation on Wii Stream Golden Shower HD. Tessellation removes the polygon look and allows displacement mapping.
wsippel said:R700 does tessellation. It might be considered a D3D12 feature, but that doesn't mean it's exclusive to D3D12 compliant GPUs.
D-Pad said:Will this next console be disk-based?
Edit- I guess so, back-compatible with Wii and all.
Retro of the mock ups that put the screen on the controller yours is the most creative one. Sadly the only way to know if its viable is to hold it in the hand. My biggest worry its the ergonomics.Retro said:
(Reposting mockup from previous page so people know what we're talking about)
Basically, when you're playing with the screen down, you'd have a touchpad on the back... so there's kind of multiple functions. I like that idea, even if the NGP gets credit for announcing it 'first'.