It's better than being a dog chasing its tail.You know, you can reply normally without using thesaurus.com and acid drop riddles you've done in the past.
This pseudo intellectual bullshit gets old fast.
It's better than being a dog chasing its tail.You know, you can reply normally without using thesaurus.com and acid drop riddles you've done in the past.
This pseudo intellectual bullshit gets old fast.
It is a different level of unfair if Ukraine offer it up than if Putin meets with Biden and they "carve up" Ukraine without any Ukrainian being at the table. I heard that is what Putin would prefer.We already knew this though. Ukraine has multiple signed treaties with Russia, signed by Yeltsin, Medvedev, and Putin himself that never mentioned Crimea as a disputed territory, and yet Putin took it anyway.
Ukraine's treaty terms are entirely up to them, but I don't see why they would accept anything less than the 1991 borders that Russia itself agreed to.
I think it depends. Russian lies always come with a truth as a disguise, so you can't discard everything they say without analisys.No. Putin’s administration has zero credibility.
Yes, but that is entirely NOT my point. And I honestly don't get why it's so difficult to understand.No. Putin’s administration has zero credibility.
Not unlike one sniffing their own farts.It's better than being a dog chasing its tail.
It's better to focus more on what a politician does rather than what they say.Yes, but that is entirely NOT my point. And I honestly don't get why it's so difficult to understand.
The veracity of his claims aren't the point. The existence of his claims are.
And being that none of us are in his head, it's perfectly rational to use what exists as a basis for an attempt at understanding.
I mean, can we not agree that it's important to understand your adversary? Isn't that, like, Warfare 101?
That's all I'm talking about. To suggest otherwise, directed at me anyway, is a strawman, and a complete waste of time and keystrokes.
If only this beacon were enlightened to most.It's better to focus more on what a politician does rather than what they say.
yer vocabuh-larry is makin me feel dum, stahp it!You know, you can reply normally without using thesaurus.com and acid drop riddles you've done in the past.
This pseudo intellectual bullshit gets old fast.
It’s important to acknowledge reality when we see it, regardless of the source, yeah. However, this conflict is similar to Germany’s invasion of Poland in 1939. Analysis of the invader’s true motives are worth discussing in both instances, since we are in a development that could escalate to a devastating world war in the worst case, but the blatantly false pretenses given for invasion by the instigating parties have little bearing on the situation.I think it depends. Russian lies always come with a truth as a disguise, so you can't discard everything they say without analisys.
For example, the russian government can say the sky is green because the way the photons reflect on the water molecules gives it that color. We all know the sky is NOT green, but we also know that the explanation given is true, so we have to be careful around that propaganda.
Nah, it's just pretender shit we've all seen online before.yer vocabuh-larry is makin me feel dum, stahp it!
"Know them by their fruits" says my friend Matt.If only this beacon were enlightened to most.
Certainly.It is a different level of unfair if Ukraine offer it up than if Putin meets with Biden and they "carve up" Ukraine without any Ukrainian being at the table. I heard that is what Putin would prefer.
"Know them by their fruits" says my friend Matt.
These Boss knockoffs fell from a particular type of tree
And you can see it everyday in people by the fruit they bear in their minds by the words they drop.
"Know them by their fruits" says my friend Matt.
These Boss knockoffs fell from a particular type of tree
And you can see it everyday in people by the fruit they bear in their minds by the words they drop.
What does the Senate have to do with this?
Bro Putin will straight up deny things we have photographic evidence of, to the face of the person with the evidence. The truth means absolutely nothing to him at this point and his subordinates are following his lead by simply denying everything we can see with our own eyes. The gap between what they’re saying about the conflict versus reality is so large that you have to assume they’re either completely bad faith actors, or completely insane. There’s no reason to believe anything they say which we can’t also triple verify ourselves at this point.And simply dismissing anything coming out of Russia, and discarding it out-of-hand, to the point where you don't even acknowledge it, delivers you similarly.
Again, depends on perspective.There is actually a time to take sides and not “both sides” are everything, and that time has arrived.
Sounds like you do understand him thenIt's madness.
You showed right there it's possible to bring those questions forward on your own terms without echoing well known Russian fascist propaganda.It's annoying seeing any attempt to understand Putin's seemingly insane, illogical moves dismissed as some kind of attempt to buy into Russian propaganda.
I've been reading about this daily for three weeks and I still can't understand why he did this, how he thought it would go, what he thought he could realistically achieve and on what timeframe, how he couldn't understand how this would drive all his enemies together after years of successfully pushing them apart.
I seriously don't get it. What was he thinking? What was the miscalculation?
Does he really think he can take and hold Kyiv, and everything will slowly normalize? It's madness.
It's annoying seeing any attempt to understand Putin's seemingly insane, illogical moves dismissed as some kind of attempt to buy into Russian propaganda.
I've been reading about this daily for three weeks and I still can't understand why he did this, how he thought it would go, what he thought he could realistically achieve and on what timeframe, how he couldn't understand how this would drive all his enemies together after years of successfully pushing them apart.
I seriously don't get it. What was he thinking? What was the miscalculation?
Does he really think he can take and hold Kyiv, and everything will slowly normalize? It's madness.
That as many times before West is all talk and no bite, busy with their consumerism, LGBTQA+ and other shit. We will go in, Ukraine will fold in 3 days, problem solved.I seriously don't get it. What was he thinking? What was the miscalculation?
It's actually a pretty clear choice when you take into account the weight and strength of the evidence to support either of those characterizations, as well as a tallying of which "side" has caused more actual harm recently. Invading an innocent and sovereign country tips the scales pretty heavily. Don't delude yourself with false equivalences.Again, depends on perspective.
I, for one, can't choose between a delusional despot with a nuclear button (Putin), and a country that allows and even welcomes literal nazis into their army (Azov Battalion), and would do exactly the same if they still have nuclear arsenal.
I choose the people's side in this, not countries.
Yes please.You people need to make up your minds about wether you want the USA to be the World Police or not.
Quick list of 8 Russian assets? They're not sending their best.
Quick list of 8 Russian assets? They're not sending their best.
Couldn't even get China and India to co-sponsor.
Considering this letter...
Couldn't even get China and India to co-sponsor.
Considering this letter...
Couldn't even get China and India to co-sponsor.
Considering this letter...
This is why I barely participate in this thread. There is no discussion to be had. Just "only good Russian is a dead Russian" , "he's just a dumb dictator doing dictator things" type rhetoric and reductive pile-on's practicing the very things one claims to hate. People like to understand the inner workings of the human condition and what drives people to do things, from serial killers to mass shooters. Especially in wartime scenarios, even more so I would argue. That is human nature to question them, unless of course you get your talking points uploaded to you.
You people need to make up your minds about wether you want the USA to be the World Police or not.
*sigh*
I know it's fashionable to take on a binary position with this, a "you're either with us or against us" stance, but you're a fool if you think this, or any other similar conflict, is that simple.
Putin is a bully, yes. Putin is a ruthless dictator, and not a human being that I have any respect for, knowing what I know of his time in power. Yes. I agree.
However, he is still the leader of that country, has considerable resources at his disposal, and there are things that he wants.
You don't engage in international diplomacy with a binary mindset. A binary approach means that negotiations never take place, no concessions are ever made, and wars never end.
Wars are fought with blood and money, but they end with diplomacy.
So, what does Putin want? I don't know that for sure, obviously, but one thing I do know is that he has stated multiple times that Ukraine in NATO is a red line.
Ukraine in NATO not only takes wealth from him, but it also puts nuclear missiles, soon to be hypersonic, with a flight-time of less than 15min (some estimates I've read are closer to 5) to Moscow. This gives the West first-strike capability. Instead of Mutallty-Assured-Destruction, Russia would then be susceptible to Unilaterally-Assured-Destruction, where Moscow is potentially destroyed without them having a chance to respond.
Whether or not NATO would ever strike first is irrelevant. The simple fact that they could is the very definition of an existential threat, just as we saw missiles in Cuba as an existential threat to the US in the 60s. And that, as I understand it, is at least one reason why he forbids Ukraine joining NATO.
In those terms, Putin's character as a leader, and Putin's character as a person, are irrelevant. He is the president of Russia, and those are his terms. If we cross them, we risk the same reaction of any leader in his position.
So, come on then, have a go, call it bullshit, tear people down for trying to have a deeper understanding, shut down conversation and label people as 'appeasers' or 'apologists' or any of the rest of the shit I see like it going on in this thread. It will not serve you, or anyone else, except those who love blind obedience and followers.
It’s one thing to want to examine the ‘nuance’ of the situation, it’s another to spend hundreds or words dancing around the fact you think Putin might have a point. It’s incredibly transparent.
And by the fact you’re seriously asking us to consider that information coming out of the Russian state might be true, pegs you right in that column.
These are the words of either a pro Russian propagandist or just a complete fool:
“And simply dismissing anything coming out of Russia, and discarding it out-of-hand, to the point where you don't even acknowledge it, delivers you similarly.”
Shut the fuck up. You’re the worst poster in this thread, reetarded accusations constantly from you.Carry on like that, if you’re intent is to somehow either rationalise or even justify Putin’s actions. Which it just might appear to be with your intimation that Putin and the west are the same in terms of trustworthiness.
Shut the fuck up. You’re the worst poster in this thread, reetarded accusations constantly from you.
Just on a side note, isn't Putin looking more and more puffy/swollen for each week that passes? Superior vena cava syndrome or superior vena cava obstruction is what it really is starting to look like, esp when you compare pictures from 2020 to now.
He doesn't look like he's gained weight, just like he's poofing up.
Still don't understand the "nuance" folks.
Every prior step he took in this direction, including the annexation of Crimea and the incursion into eastern Ukraine was met with a weak response from the west. The USA has been more divided than ever and busy tearing itself apart. The fall of Afghanistan to the Taliban was another signal. He thought he would get his way once again.