FunkMiller
Banned
Its a twitter post, stop being so dramatic.
Sorry if the discovery that Musk is a bit of an asshat is troubling for you.
Its a twitter post, stop being so dramatic.
Can someone explain to me how Russia can be a threat to whole Europe, while we also belittle every strategic choice their army is doing? Isn’t this a paradox?
It would be smarter for them to start war with nuking whole west world. Bigger chance of winning. Any attack on Norwegian pipelines or tankers would be considered act of war.Russia can (even without nukes) do a lot of damage if they choose to. Blowing up the Norwegian gas pipelines and torpedoing a few LNG tankers would be quite damaging and Russia can simply deny doing it, blaming the US as always.
You know what bothers me? Ukraine fought hard for Kherson and now that they have a major victory forcing a victorious retreat from the Russian forces we get tons of people dumping kremlin takes on the thread.
Nah on the nukes, it’d guarantee their extinction. The nuclear triad ensures this.It would be smarter for them to start war with nuking whole west world. Bigger chance of winning. Any attack on Norwegian pipelines or tankers would be considered act of war.
I explained it twice already. Can't do better than that.Your comment:
You clearly stated you didn't think Ukraine could win.
If they were actually NATO backed, I'd have a different opinion. Aside from a few intelligence operators, there are no NATO soldiers in Ukraine as far as we know.And you are claiming that NATO backed Ukraine cannot beat Russia... with absolutely no evidence to suggest this is true, so what's the point in even saying it? Again, what evidence do you have of this?
Agreed. But no country is abiding by that rule except maybe Switzerland.Ruzzia has no saying on that. It should be like Ruzzia decided later to join Taiwan, and China attacks them because it is not what they want. No country has the right to tell another what they can do. Ruzzia had a deal with Ukraine for the loss of their Nuclear capabilities and we know how that ended.
I explained it twice already. Can't do better than that.
If they were actually NATO backed, I'd have a different opinion. Aside from a few intelligence operators, there are no NATO soldiers in Ukraine as far as we know.
I dont judge people based on twitter or forum posts if they have at least a semblance of rational thought behind it. People are allowed to make posts that sound stupid.
Sorry if the discovery that Musk is a bit of an asshat is troubling for you.
Yes I did, and I gave a straight answer. Both Ukraine and Russia likely can't win this war. For Russia it largely depends on what their goals were.No. You didn't. And your inability to provide a straight answer is telling.
Yeah, I don't think that's gonna be enough.And of course by 'NATO backed', you know damn well I mean equipment, intel, training and strategic advice.
They really don't need NATO troops to kill all those pathetic Russians
I explained it twice already. Can't do better than that.
If they were actually NATO backed, I'd have a different opinion. Aside from a few intelligence operators, there are no NATO soldiers in Ukraine as far as we know.
Nope.Hold on, didn’t you try to claim a few posts above that the only reason Ukraine is succeeding is because foreign troops?
Nope.
War with whole NATO guarantees that too, but unlike with starting war with nukes they would never have a chance to strike first.Nah on the nukes, it’d guarantee their extinction. The nuclear triad ensures this.
Russia changes its tune daily on what success looks like. Their goals initially included toppling the government and capturing Kyiv in the first week.Yes I did, and I gave a straight answer. Both Ukraine and Russia likely can't win this war. For Russia it largely depends on what their goals were.
Ukraine has the manpower, training, equipment, and, perhaps most importantly, the initiative and will to keep fighting. This very well could end with the return of Crimea to Ukraine and Putz being deposed. That might seem like pie in the sky and wishful thinking at this point, but so was the idea of Ukraine holding on for more than a week or two in February. Russia is running out of men and equipment, and throwing in a bunch of freezing, drunk conscripts with rusty 50 year old kalashnikovs isn’t going to make a difference.Yeah, I don't think that's gonna be enough.
Terrible gotcha, it's not like us peasants know anything for sure. We're exchanging mostly opinions.
I agree that it might be too late for a turnaround. It'll still be enough to prolong this war for a decade, if need be.
All I see is baseless accusations. Feel free to disengage.
Ukraine is really blitzing them on 2 fronts. It's impressive. Russia will probably end up throwing a bunch of untrained bodies into the fire, to try to slow the advance. But that's only going to have a negative effect, as the mounting casualties sap morale. All this going into winter with supply lines under constant fire. I'm hoping for a cascade effect.Ukraine's rapid advance into Russian-held areas is outpacing Russia’s efforts to expedite training for newly mobilized troops to reinforce its campaign, say Ukrainian & Western officials.“There is virtually nothing Russia can do that can make a difference"
twitter.com/mjluxm...
Plain and simple, Ruzzia has no capabilities to train people for war (at this time), which takes months, their corrupt army, and ineptitude go from Putler to the lowest soldier. We have seen stories about people getting only bullets (no weapons), people mobilized after getting to the bus, the military telling the poor meat shield to get tampons and women's pads, others being thrown in a forest with nothing, soldiers getting drunk, getting shoot by their own, and more of this shitshow of war.
Ukraine is really blitzing them on 2 fronts. It's impressive. Russia will probably end up throwing a bunch of untrained bodies into the fire, to try to slow the advance. But that's only going to have a negative effect, as the mounting casualties sap morale. All this going into winter with supply lines under constant fire. I'm hoping for a cascade effect.
I can see a lot of Ruzzian being frozen to death way before winter (I do not know when it "officially" starts). Some places I read are now at -5. At the beginning of the war, there were multiple frozen Ruzzians, and they had better equipment and fewer problems than now.
Its a twitter post, stop being so dramatic.
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov also told reporters in a conference call that Moscow had always been open to a negotiated end to the conflict.
Doesn't matter. Only stuff like this does:
Who cares what they say? they will thank anyone at this point.Well, Kreml begs to differ. They found it important enough to thank Musk for his service..
And interestingly enough they ended their thanks with this:
Absurd to the max, ruzzians being ruzzians. No scruples.
Who cares what they say?
Either discuss the topic or move on. No need for baseless accusations.The console warring arguing tactics you use in Xbox vs whatever console are annoying, but for you to use those tactics on an international conflict where people are dying and the aggressor believes in genocide is a completely different level. I don't think you have the intelligence or mental capacity to have a productive discussion about this as your best attempt is what you are doing now, troll and annoy.
Either discuss the topic or move on. No need for baseless accusations.
You gotta keep chasing those fuckers .. right back into Russia .. so they can’t dig in .Ukraine is really blitzing them on 2 fronts. It's impressive. Russia will probably end up throwing a bunch of untrained bodies into the fire, to try to slow the advance. But that's only going to have a negative effect, as the mounting casualties sap morale. All this going into winter with supply lines under constant fire. I'm hoping for a cascade effect.
Musk offered an opinion. What Russia does with that is not in our hands.What do you mean who cares what the people behind the invasion of Ukraine have to say about one of the most influential people in the world..? The propaganda value is astronomical in the context of legitimizing the invasion/land-grabbing to common ruzzians, and hence it furthers the Kremlin stranglehold on ruzzia and fuels their Russkiye mir crusade on eastern Europe.
I would hardly call it baseless accuscations... You rountily make up shit or peddle garbage as fact then walk away from the discussion without providing any receipts.Either discuss the topic or move on. No need for baseless accusations.
Either discuss the topic or move on. No need for baseless accusations.
I did discuss it. As said before, we're mostly exchanging opinions here. It is what it is. And time will show who was right.You’re not actually discussing it neither since you avoid arguing the facts and hide behind “belief” to repeat the same things.
I did discuss it. As said before, we're mostly exchanging opinions here. It is what it is. And time will show who was right.
If you are wondering about what happens if Russia uses nukes on Ukraine, allow me to present you the Hadley circulation. With particular attention to the westerlies, a dominant wind in Europe, that flows from west to east.
Radiation fallout would still affect western Europe, but the country hit the most, after Ukraine, would be Russia.
Stalemate long term, as we've seen in the past 4 months or so before the counterattack.Ukraine advancing is a fact. Yet you claim stalemate.
No. I just say that them being in a non-ideal state won't change the outcome (stalemate) much.Russian mobilized troops are not being trained nor given equipment and the morale is low, that’s a fact. Yet you claim these troops will be decisive.
Both things can be true at the same time. I don't think they will run out of weapons or ammunition any time soon.Russia being reduced to buying artillery supplies from North Korea and sending 1960s tanks to the front is a fact. Yet you claim they have unending supplies of Soviet era equipment.
Ukraine taking back some territory doesn't necessarily mean they can take all of the territory, yes.Ukraine taking back massive swathes of territory while Russian best troops can barely move the Donetsk frontline is a fact. Yet you claim without NATO troops Ukraine can’t win.
Instead of accepting differing opinions, you're trying to discredit me as a troll. Many such cases! Sad!You are not arguing the facts, you are trolling to disrupt the thread.
Shut the fuck up man.Stalemate long term, as we've seen in the past 4 months or so before the counterattack.
No. I just say that them being in a non-ideal state won't change the outcome (stalemate) much.
Both things can be true at the same time. I don't think they will run out of weapons or ammunition any time soon.
Ukraine taking back some territory doesn't necessarily mean they can take all of the territory, yes.
Instead of accepting differing opinions, you're trying to discredit me as a troll. Many such cases! Sad!
Nukes have a very short half life - it's different than a reactor failure - but within days radiation is broadly dispersed in negligable amounts into the high atmosphere. Nukes are obviously shitty, but radioactive fallout isn't the deepest concern (unless dosens are dropped, but it's still not a Chernobyl like event).