First of all, and most importantly, thank you for your service. We all are truly indebted to you for your sacrifices and those of your friends and servicemen.
This is a great point. If I have free time tomorrow I will reach out to the author, but he (also a senior editor at 19FortyFive on the side) claims it was done for a private defense contract. So, we shall see what he'll says.
Also agreed. I was fortunate to sit in for a single session of a wargame while at the institution which shall go nameless because it'll just be mocked again by those that instead use TikTok as the source of all knowledge back in the 2007 timeframe concerning a confrontation with Iran as the red team. It was sort of neat to see it unfold and how asymmetric warfare was [badly] modeled. So you're totally right about the shortcomings, but I would suggest to you I would prefer an ensemble of models over nothing to base my decision making on.
I remember this. I don't want to go to off-topic, but I think the US would be in a lot of trouble if China decided to go all in over Taiwan. It's no longer 1998 when Clinton could and did actually sail a carrier battle group into the South China Sea and the Chinese had no idea where it was. Today, Guam and Japan and SK and any sea within DF-21D range is fucked. The American public would get a rude awakening losing 5,000 sailors in a few hours. If you're interested or have a counter-point, feel free to message me.
That's what I think people here are missing. The West is exogenously pumping in the weapons to fight in Ukraine and they are basically strategically stable. They're making good progress in recapturing front-line towns like Kharkov or the salient at Lyman, but this is tactical stuff. Frankly, a realistic analysis would be that the Ukrainian military power is over-rated in here. To accomplish the types of things people in here think (or desire or wish) to happen when I've pushed for their realistic end-game scenario -- like pushing the Russians out of Ukraine proper back to basically Bucharest 1994 lines and reset Crimea and everything will require strategic movement hundreds of miles deep and equipment that they just lack. To do this will require huge escalations in equipment to engage mobility and airpower, otherwise it's going to be this grinding it out, first world war style battle as Russia mobilizes. That's where the article I posted and the scary wargames come into play. Herman Kahn wrote an excellent 1964/5 book on escalation and it's noteworthy for it's 'ladder of escalation.' I don't know about you, but I see it happening. The west is keeping this war going, without the west this is over tomorrow. It's basically a proxy war that's getting ratchet up hard by the west and Putin, who is now threatening to throw the trump card down. I don't want to see if he plays it over a single hand in the game of geopolitics that the west will win in the long-run anyways.
I would like to thank you again for your service and the very thoughtful reply. It's most appreciated!