I'm not sure if you understood that my comment was sarcastic. Sorry if that wasn't clear.Your groceries matter more than hundreds of thousands of lives, the free world, and the lasting impact for generations.
Of course.
I'm not sure if you understood that my comment was sarcastic. Sorry if that wasn't clear.
Russia has lost more than 3,000 tanks during the war in Ukraine, but has enough armoured vehicles of lower quality in stock to replace them and could potentially withstand another three years of heavy losses. This has been stated in the report Military Balance by the International Institute for Strategic Studies, based in London.
Source: Reuters with reference to the report
Quote: "Moscow has been able to trade quality for quantity though, by pulling thousands of older tanks out of storage at a rate that may, at times, have reached 90 tanks per month."
Details: The report noted that Ukraine had also suffered significant losses since the invasion began in February 2022, but Western military supplies have allowed it to maintain its stockpile while improving its quality.
Analysts estimate that Russia's stockpile means that Russia "could potentially sustain around three more years of heavy losses and replenish tanks from stocks, even if at lower-technical standard, irrespective of its ability to produce new equipment."
In particular, it is stated in the report that Russia has 1,750 main battle tanks, ranging from the outdated T-55 to the modern T-80 and T-90. Another 4,000 are in storage.
"The situation underscored a growing feeling of a stalemate in the fighting that may persist through 2024," said the report.
Background: The General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine reported that as of 13 February, the Russian invaders have lost 6,424 tanks in Ukraine.
Look at those MAGA cunts REEEE:ing
My issue with that $$$ isn't so much the amount, but the accountability of where it is going. I bet there are a lot more chateaus in Switzerland being built right now. Not to mention the funneling of it back into the US political system.
Give us transparent accounting of where it goes, what it is buying, who it is helping. I'm actually ok with like a 10% "lost in the shuffle" amount so long as it isn't straight biting us in the hand. Honest grift and inflated pricing for goods is fine. I agree we are seeing a pretty good return on it assuming we are cycling out old ammo for new, old gear for better stuff, and developing new systems to need wartime requirements that will last past this conflict.
Russia's focus on quantity over quality leaves it with enough tanks for another 3 years of war – report
The Russian invaders have sustained monumental losses over the last two years, but decades of stockpiling during the Cold War have left them with plenty of armor still in storage, unfortunately.
Russia's focus on quantity over quality leaves it with enough tanks for another 3 years of war – report
The Russian invaders have sustained monumental losses over the last two years, but decades of stockpiling during the Cold War have left them with plenty of armor still in storage, unfortunately.
True, but that still means that Russia ahs to refurbish those tanks into minimal working order. The older a tank is, the harder it is to make it work as it should.
With Ru7ssia being as corrupt as it is, chances are most of these tanks won't get new optics, electronics, etc.
Russia will also have to train new crews, since Russian tanks have very low survival rates.
Then tanks need to have their own supply lines for ammo and fuel. With Russia using older and older tanks, that means more diverse types of ammo, meaning more complex logistics.
And using old ammo on old tanks is a recipe for failures.
The reality is that it's not as simple to just get tanks out of storage and send them to the front lines.
Remember a couple of weeks ago 2 Bradley's destroyed a t-90m tank by out flanking it and just shredding it with bullets?I don't think anyone needs to worry about half a century old tanks
Are you kidding? HIMARS rockets cost $100,000 EACH. There are 6 to a pack. Plus the launch vehicle, transportation, maintenance, instructions for use. I bet its a LEAST a 2 million per pack quote from factory to Ukranian warehouse, probably 5-6 mill if it includes the truck. Add in some rush overheads, expeditied shipping, all the ancillary equipment, etc, there is plenty of extra $$$ to siphon off for the old homestead. I'm not even upset if the US manufacture upcharges the gov, so long as it is reasonable, there is at least some $$$ going to improving the factory for the next time, and the rockets do end up in Ukraine shooting at russians and not in some CIA stash somewhere for some secret conflict. Accountability.In
The money goes to Lockheed Martin and other military producers. Essentially the money doesn’t leave America, it’s used to buy materiel and the materiel shipped to Ukraine.
I don’t think you can build yourself a mansion with HIMARS rockets, but you’re free to try.
Are you kidding? HIMARS rockets cost $100,000 EACH. There are 6 to a pack. Plus the launch vehicle, transportation, maintenance, instructions for use. I bet its a LEAST a 2 million per pack quote from factory to Ukranian warehouse, probably 5-6 mill if it includes the truck. Add in some rush overheads, expeditied shipping, all the ancillary equipment, etc, there is plenty of extra $$$ to siphon off for the old homestead. I'm not even upset if the US manufacture upcharges the gov, so long as it is reasonable, there is at least some $$$ going to improving the factory for the next time, and the rockets do end up in Ukraine shooting at russians and not in some CIA stash somewhere for some secret conflict. Accountability.
Are you kidding? HIMARS rockets cost $100,000 EACH. There are 6 to a pack. Plus the launch vehicle, transportation, maintenance, instructions for use. I bet its a LEAST a 2 million per pack quote from factory to Ukranian warehouse, probably 5-6 mill if it includes the truck. Add in some rush overheads, expeditied shipping, all the ancillary equipment, etc, there is plenty of extra $$$ to siphon off for the old homestead. I'm not even upset if the US manufacture upcharges the gov, so long as it is reasonable, there is at least some $$$ going to improving the factory for the next time, and the rockets do end up in Ukraine shooting at russians and not in some CIA stash somewhere for some secret conflict. Accountability.
And a lot of these weapons have a use-by dateIt’s FAR more likely that the weapons are used in Ukraine to destroy Russia’s weapon stockpiles than for them to end up anywhere else. All the talk about weapons being misdirected and yet we’re not seeing the Houthis or Hamas using advanced weaponry.
These were weapons moldering away in warehouses, some destined for decommissioning. Giving them to an ally nation to fight off a historical adversary is using them for the right purposes. These weapons were never going to build houses or roads in the U.S. they were stockpiled to destroy Russian armor. Replacing them will provide thousands of high quality jobs and leave the US with newer weapons systems.
Letting Russia get away with Ukraine would lead to a massive loss of confidence in the U.S. with their European and Asian partners. Why should the Taiwanese or Japanese folks trust the U.S. for support when all it takes is some crazy old men in Congress to insist on no support for political reasons?
TruthbombLetting Russia get away with Ukraine would lead to a massive loss of confidence in the U.S. with their European and Asian partners. Why should the Taiwanese or Japanese folks trust the U.S. for support when all it takes is some crazy old men in Congress to insist on no support for political reasons?
️ Russia shells Selidove, Donetsk region, killing 3 people, including a child.
12 more people were injured, including four children.
: Regional Military Administration
Overnight, the Russians attacked Selidove in the Donetsk region — they hit a five-story building and a hospital. Currently, we know of 3 dead, including a child, and 12 wounded.
Fragments from a Russian drone that crashed into Moldova contained explosives the country's police said, as Foreign Minister Mihai Popsoi condemned Russia's “barbaric attacks” across the border in Ukraine.
I don't think anyone needs to worry about half a century old tanks
Good thing the 25mm APHET of the Bradley can make gruyere of the T-54/55 armor.Hate to say this but a half century old tank still sports at least a 105/125mm cannon that can be used to assault infantry positions, specially if the other side is low on tanks, AT weapons and heavy artillery.
This kind of grind is exactly what Russia wants
Wonder what this is all about?
Interesting.Something to do with space?
Soyuz-2-1v launches classified payload
Soyuz-2-1v launch on Feb. 9, 2024 | Story by Anatoly Zak | Editor: Alain Chabotwww.russianspaceweb.com
trump is russian spy , who would have thought.
Wonder what this is all about?
A new Cold War for a new millenia. Maybe it’ll light a fire under America’s complacent asses and get us to take space seriously again. Nothing like an old-fashioned nuclear capable rival to motivate folks.Something to do with space?
Soyuz-2-1v launches classified payload
Soyuz-2-1v launch on Feb. 9, 2024 | Story by Anatoly Zak | Editor: Alain Chabotwww.russianspaceweb.com
Two sources familiar with deliberations on Capitol Hill said the intelligence has to do with the Russians wanting to put a nuclear weapon into space.
This is not to drop a nuclear weapon onto Earth but rather to possibly use against satellites.
Good thing the 25mm APHET of the Bradley can make gruyere of the T-54/55 armor.
Add 1 boat.
UN says nothing as per usual, so hospitals being attacked and kids killed only matter in one part of the world. Can't work out what's more useless, UN or russian navy.
Good ol' firehose of bullshit in action.I do not know who is even the worst liar...