ScarJo takes lead role in GHOST IN THE SHELL

Status
Not open for further replies.
Not fluent in English; so that would be a tough casting, unfortunately.

If the movie was going to get made regardless of who they cast; then I'd be a little more annoyed. But seeing as that the movie doesn't happen unless they get a major star; I'd rather not have perfect be the enemy of good (a lesbian/bi-sexual female action hero - that's a fairly big step)

Pretty much this.
 
I'm ok with ScarJo on this...

It will be a western film make by westerners for western audiences. It makes perfect sense that they cast a westerner with enough screen presence to carry a movie and enough star power to get seats filled in theaters. At least they didn't cast Sam Worthington as the main character.
 
Like I said before, Batou should have the leading role. Keep Motoko distant, otherwise it wouldn't work. Going with Scarjo is dumb.
 
Like I said before, Batou should have the leading role. Keep Motoko distant, otherwise it wouldn't work. Going with Scarjo is dumb.

No thanks. Makoto is the namesake, more machine than person, unsure where the line between the really begins and ends. Batou is a good foil and anchor but to make him the lead would be worse than having Batman: The Movie and have it centered around Alfred. He simply is not as interesting.

ScarJo isn't a terrible actress but it really depends on the script either way.
 
Not fluent in English; so that would be a tough casting, unfortunately.

If the movie was going to get made regardless of who they cast; then I'd be a little more annoyed. But seeing as that the movie doesn't happen unless they get a major star; I'd rather not have perfect be the enemy of good (a lesbian/bi-sexual female action hero - that's a fairly big step)

I have a feeling when the movie comes out we might think the good would have been the movie not happening.
 
Like I said before, Batou should have the leading role. Keep Motoko distant, otherwise it wouldn't work. Going with Scarjo is dumb.


No thanks. Makoto is the namesake, more machine than
person, unsure where the line between the really begins and ends. Batou is a good foil and anchor but to make him the lead would be worse than having Batman: The Movie and have it centered around Alfred. He simply is not as interesting.

ScarJo isn't a terrible actress but it really depends on the script either way.

QUOTE=BeatResetsTheWorld;146117368]What are you even talking about??? Motoko is a much better character and the LEADER of Section 9 (ignoring Aramaki). You can't have her playing a secondary role.[/QUOTE]


It actually did work in Ghost in the Shell 2. Batou can carry a movie. But, I doubt you'd see this in a Live Action movie. Maybe a sequel.
 
Rinko Kikuchi should have gotten this.

Okay, let me head this one off at the pass. I can't name a film she was in that was a big-budget blockbuster. And before anyone plays the Pacific Rim card, that was an ensemble cast and the film nearly bombed anyways (China saved that film's ass after it got beat by Grown Ups 2 on opening weekend.)

Plus, isn't she toxic in the Japanese film industry?
 
Okay, let me head this one off at the pass. I can't name a film she was in that was a big-budget blockbuster. And before anyone plays the Pacific Rim card, that was an ensemble cast and the film nearly bombed anyways (China saved that film's ass after it got beat by Grown Ups 2 on opening weekend.)

Plus, isn't she toxic in the Japanese film industry?

Well, she was in Assault Girls (directed by Mamoru Oshii himself) but it sucked
 
Just do a full white wash like Edge of Tomorrow/all you need is kill/live die repeat and it's all good.

Just don't do a half assed white wash like that Akira movie currently in development hell.
 
she can pull it off. All that matters is the script and cinematography. If its bullshit hollywood i will be upset. Hope its not like robocop remake or total recall.
 
I think she works. She has a sort of round face, and has pulled off a similar hairstyle in the past.

I'm more concerned about the director, there's not enough history to judge him properly. The Huntsman was a shit movie, but it looked nice.
 
Okay, let me head this one off at the pass. I can't name a film she was in that was a big-budget blockbuster. And before anyone plays the Pacific Rim card, that was an ensemble cast and the film nearly bombed anyways (China saved that film's ass after it got beat by Grown Ups 2 on opening weekend.)

Plus, isn't she toxic in the Japanese film industry?
I don't give a fuck. I'd prefer her over ScarJo
 
What are you even talking about??? Motoko is a much better character and the LEADER of Section 9 (ignoring Aramaki). You can't have her playing a secondary role.

Enjoy your Hollywoodized Montana then. The only way to keep Motoko true to her character is to not have her as the lead. She's supposed to be mysterious, that works if the audience relates to Batou, not her. They'll completely change her character for the movie, there's no way she'll be her usual emotionless character, but they could have done that with Batou as the lead. GitS is not about Mokoto being the "leader" of Section 9. She isn't really even a leader, she's more like a weapon. They rely on her due to her mechanical abilities, not her character. That alone is a rather important point, and would also be ruined by making her the lead.
 
It actually did work in Ghost in the Shell 2. Batou can carry a movie. But, I doubt you'd see this in a Live Action movie. Maybe a sequel.

But Innocence was FAR inferior to the first movie, and it would also be a terrible way to introduce people to the series. I mean, that movie was basically just Batou and Togusa, right? I mean, it only works when the Major and the rest of section 9 aren't really around, otherwise it wouldn't make sense for her to be playing a secondary character
 
I feel pretty indifferent. She was decent in WS and Avengers, and she's been generally better in movies recently than she was in the 2000s. She's not really Motoko to be...but she's shown she can pull of a badass action counter terrorist so there's that.
 
rinko-kikuchi-chocolate-03.gif
 
But Innocence was FAR inferior to the first movie, and it would also be a terrible way to introduce people to the series. I mean, that movie was basically just Batou and Togusa, right? I mean, it only works when the Major and the rest of section 9 aren't really around, otherwise it wouldn't make sense for her to be playing a secondary character

Sure it makes plenty of sense. Why do you assume that her not being the lead mean she's not there all the time? Who is the lead in Se7en?
 
If we had asian people it would be pretty embarrassing if we cast a white person for an asian character.
Why should the race of the Major matter so much if it's set in America. To turn the black James Bond argument around, what aspect of the major is defined by her race?
 
Why should the race of the Major matter so much if it's set in America. To turn the black James Bond argument around, what aspect of the major is defined by her race?
Why even adapt Ghost in the Shell? Why not just make some generic cyberpunk thing at that point?
 
Why even adapt Ghost in the Shell? Why not just make some generic cyberpunk thing at that point?
I guess because Hollywood likes remakes. Also just changing the setting of the movie is still far from turning it into generic cyberpunk.

Edge of Tomorrow also changed the race of the character and locations but the Manga origins are still clearly there
 
If we had asian people it would be pretty embarrassing if we cast a white person for an asian character.

The entire cast is Asian in the source material, it's set in a fictional city modelled on Hong Kong but with Japanese influences. There's a very high probability (99.9999999999999%) that this film will be set in the United States, not in Asia, since it's a Hollywood film. There is no direct 1:1 guide on how to change a cast of Japanese people into a cast of American people, but we would generally agree that if you did a remake of a foreign film which transposes the setting, you aren't required to make all of the actors the same ethnicity as the actors in the original film unless it's somehow important to the story.

I guess if you wanted to be totally authentic you'd just set it in Japan and have a full cast of Japanese actors. But nobody really expected anything like that to come out of an American adaptation.
 
I guess because Hollywood likes remakes. Also just changing the setting of the movie is still far from turning it into generic cyberpunk.
But who cares about Ghost in the Shell at this point? Maybe if this was the late 90s, but now the franchise is basically irrelevant in American culture.

They could just call the movie Cyber Cops or something and do just as well, without annoying the one fanbase that would actually care about GitS and without having to pay any licensing fees either.
 
I'm okay with ScarJo, but GITS is my all-time favorite anime film, so I have extremely high expectations. Which I doubt this will meet, so...
 
But who cares about Ghost in the Shell at this point? Maybe if this was the late 90s, but now the franchise is basically irrelevant in American culture.

They could just call the movie Cyber Cops or something and do just as well, without annoying the one fanbase that would actually care about GitS and without having to pay any licensing fees either.

Are you gonna let Hollywood whitewash Cyber Cops too?
You monster!

35049.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom