sixteen-bit
Member
...so what game ya'll wanna play for the holidays?
pokemon moon
just keeping it 💯
...so what game ya'll wanna play for the holidays?
...so what game ya'll wanna play for the holidays?
Starting to see more and more of this on eBay lately. I purchased a Torneko the last hope and it was listed as Like New and arrived in horrible condition. Also beware of cart based games listed as "professionally cleaned". When two of them arrived they had brasso globs inside the carts. That crap eats away at the contacts. "Professionally cleaned", my ass.
Seems like a huge risk, on the seller's side, but then again... So many clueless/shameless/dodgy people sell retro on eBay, nowadays. You really need to CSI every picture, description and feedback history, before buying anything in the wild.
As others said, sucks that you had to go through this, Dave, but glad to see it's all sorted. ^_-
i guess i should've specified what games relevant to this thread might ya'll be playing, so we can maybe do a poll hint hint
Gonna play Shining in the Darkness since that is the game of the month for December.
wait, i thought that was the Nov game? i mean, we can just run with that if nothing else
Phantasy Star II was amazing at the time, especially for its story and scope, but it aged terribly. The maze-like dungeons are tedious as hell, combat is very grindy, and it's just... a slog, sad to say.So I'm finally going back and playing all the classic RPG's that I missed. I've played through the big SNES titles, and I want to try out what Genesis had to offer. Are any of the Phantasy Star games still worth playing? I tried playing Phantasy Star II for about 30 minutes and it was... rough. Are 3 or 4 any better? I hear Shining Force is pretty good as well.
Phantasy Star II was amazing at the time, especially for its story and scope, but it aged terribly. The maze-like dungeons are tedious as hell, combat is very grindy, and it's just... a slog, sad to say.So I'm finally going back and playing all the classic RPG's that I missed. I've played through the big SNES titles, and I want to try out what Genesis had to offer. Are any of the Phantasy Star games still worth playing? I tried playing Phantasy Star II for about 30 minutes and it was... rough. Are 3 or 4 any better? I hear Shining Force is pretty good as well.
Weirdly enough I think Phantasy Star I aged better. I managed to beat that semi-recently (I was in an odd mood to draw maps, though... xD) whereas I gave up on PS II.
Phantasy Star III, I can't comment on. I rented that wayyyy back then and I instantly hated it. I never gave it much of a chance though, but it's often considered the odd one in the series and most people don't care for it. I wouldn't recommend it.
Phantasy Star IV, however, is fantastic. It holds up perfectly well (played it recently), it is not grindy, dungeons are well-designed, the pacing is fantastic, the story is cool and epic despite the mediocre translation, soundtrack is great... truly one of the best 16-bit JRPGs and still one of my favourites.
Shining Force I and II are also fantastic and hold up well. SF1 is a bit rough in some spots (weirdly balanced at times -- too many useless knight characters, wonky and inconsistent enemy AI in some battles), but still very fun. SF2 improved on just about every aspect of SF1 (except maybe character art, which I oddly preferred in SF1 for the most part -- SF2 still has a good art direction though), can't recommend it enough. An all-time classic.
Phantasy Star II was amazing at the time, especially for its story and scope, but it aged terribly. The maze-like dungeons are tedious as hell, combat is very grindy, and it's just... a slog, sad to say.
Weirdly enough I think Phantasy Star I aged better. I managed to beat that semi-recently (I was in an odd mood to draw maps, though... xD) whereas I gave up on PS II.
Phantasy Star III, I can't comment on. I rented that wayyyy back then and I instantly hated it. I never gave it much of a chance though, but it's often considered the odd one in the series and most people don't care for it. I wouldn't recommend it.
I think you are the first person to ever recommend Traysia, lol. Everything I heard about this game seems to be uniformly terrible. xD
Phantasy Star II was amazing at the time, especially for its story and scope, but it aged terribly. The maze-like dungeons are tedious as hell, combat is very grindy, and it's just... a slog, sad to say.
Weirdly enough I think Phantasy Star I aged better. I managed to beat that semi-recently (I was in an odd mood to draw maps, though... xD) whereas I gave up on PS II.
Phantasy Star III, I can't comment on. I rented that wayyyy back then and I instantly hated it. I never gave it much of a chance though, but it's often considered the odd one in the series and most people don't care for it. I wouldn't recommend it.
Phantasy Star IV, however, is fantastic. It holds up perfectly well (played it recently), it is not grindy, dungeons are well-designed, the pacing is fantastic, the story is cool and epic despite the mediocre translation, soundtrack is great... truly one of the best 16-bit JRPGs and still one of my favourites.
Shining Force I and II are also fantastic and hold up well. SF1 is a bit rough in some spots (weirdly balanced at times -- too many useless knight characters, wonky and inconsistent enemy AI in some battles), but still very fun. SF2 improved on just about every aspect of SF1 (except maybe character art, which I oddly preferred in SF1 for the most part -- SF2 still has a good art direction though), can't recommend it enough. An all-time classic.
I think you are the first person to ever recommend Traysia, lol. Everything I heard about this game seems to be uniformly terrible. xD
use the pause/menu/walk and it's enjoyable =)
Do I miss anything by jumping straight into PSIV? Should I at least be familiar with the plots of the other games?
What the hell happened to the title of this thread? lol
Anyway, cross post:
Computerphile is on a streak with interesting videos. Their latest is about coding on a Sega MegaDrive. Dude is super legit. Worked on Frostbite engine, has a real MD dev kit setup, and has been developing something for 3 years on it.
Me too!Sounds interesting. Definitely saving this for later.
Anyone with Phantasy Star IV PAL? Last I checked the ROM hasn't been dumped and no one can say whether the game was PAL-optimised or not. I don't care that much about the ROM itself if it exists, but I would like to know whether I can be content with a PAL copy or if I have to import.
What the hell happened to the title of this thread? lol
Anyway, cross post:
Computerphile is on a streak with interesting videos. Their latest is about coding on a Sega MegaDrive. Dude is super legit. Worked on Frostbite engine, has a real MD dev kit setup, and has been developing something for 3 years on it.
They put the PAL version on the Wii VC. It's not optimised. Music is noticably slower than the US version. Gameplay wise it shouldn't make that much of a difference though, and if you haven't heard the soundtrack at the original speed then you'd not really mind either.
What the hell happened to the title of this thread? lol
Anyway, cross post:
Computerphile is on a streak with interesting videos. Their latest is about coding on a Sega MegaDrive. Dude is super legit. Worked on Frostbite engine, has a real MD dev kit setup, and has been developing something for 3 years on it.
Any idea if it goes back to normal when the console is 60Hz? Or if there is a region lock?
Not that much. Phantasy Star IV was my first Phantasy Star, and I was fine. I did know a bit about some plot points from previous PS games, though. Maybe read up on the backstory a bit online if you want.Do I miss anything by jumping straight into PSIV? Should I at least be familiar with the plots of the other games?
That is odd.So PS1 holds up more than PSII? Weird.
So PS1 holds up more than PSII? Weird.
Yeah, I also thought Shining in the Darkness was the November game (which I was bummed about because I wasn't able to finish by last night.)
I didn't play EWJ.
yeah, it's been confusing without jake here before & the thread title staying stagnant!
yeah i
'm sorta in limbo but trying to keep up with the titles.
Yeah, I think it does. PS II is too grindy and more of a slog.So PS1 holds up more than PSII? Weird.
I don't know about the title change, but just wanted apologize for the confusion. I just simple don't have the time to assemble a game of the month at this point. Maybe I put too much into it, but it seemed the time spent wasn't worth it, because not many people jumped in. I tried to make it as flashy as possible to get more interested, but that didn't seem to work and in the end I just burnt my self out. Just wasn't having fun and thats what its all about. You can all hate me now.
I don't know about the title change, but just wanted apologize for the confusion. I just simple don't have the time to assemble a game of the month at this point. Maybe I put too much into it, but it seemed the time spent wasn't worth it, because not many people jumped in. I tried to make it as flashy as possible to get more interested, but that didn't seem to work and in the end I just burnt my self out. Just wasn't having fun and thats what its all about. You can all hate me now.
Well, to change topics to puzzle games for a bit, what does Gens/MD gaf think about Columns?
S'okay. Columns III is arguably better, tho; more-involved single-player campaign.Hmm I see.
Well, to change topics to puzzle games for a bit, what does Gens/MD gaf think about Columns?
I don't know about the title change, but just wanted apologize for the confusion. I just simple don't have the time to assemble a game of the month at this point. Maybe I put too much into it, but it seemed the time spent wasn't worth it, because not many people jumped in. I tried to make it as flashy as possible to get more interested, but that didn't seem to work and in the end I just burnt my self out. Just wasn't having fun and thats what its all about. You can all hate me now.
Holy shit guys, you have to watch this