Not based on the fact you disagree, but the manner and reasons for which you disagree. Your position is flawed and doesn't make sense. You constantly erect strawmen and extend points to absurdity so you can say "well I don't want what I just made up to happen, therefore you're wrong."
People have tried to be very patient with you but you are not arguing in good faith and it's clear you came in with predispositions and have no desire to question or examine them.
Yes, I have predispositions. I am willing to question and examine them, surprisingly enough that's how I arrived at my current views on pretty much all my political positions. I come from a family that's basically a conservative archetype and was raised that way (farming on one side, business on the other and quite financially secure, grew up in a relatively small country town, where my family owned one of the major businesses). The first time I voted it was for my country's conservative party. Through examining other ideas, I've ended up roughly centre-left (in the European sense, which don't think has an actual meaningful US equivalent and its equivalent is the most left-wing party of any note in Australia (Greens)) with some areas where I adhere closer to libertarian views (largely free expression / censorship).
I fully support marriage equality (and go a bit beyond the norm in that I support marriage rights whatever the configuration of your marriage is as long as all participants have freely give informed consent and that no harm comes to anyone as a result of it). I accept affirmative action as a necessary evil in the short term (and I mean that in the societal sense, so it could well surpass my lifetime) in order to correct ingrained institution and social biases against disadvantage racial groups / women and support it for that reason, I strongly support a social safety net (including universal healthcare, and access to education, as well as appropriate social measures to mean people aren't obligated to take poor jobs just to subsist).
I believe that feminism has achieved many positive outcomes and think its a positive force and am only concerned about somethings that I think may, perhaps be a bridge too far, because they directly clash with those areas in which I'm more libertarianish. I'm willing to be persuaded otherwise (my acceptance of affirmative action is less than half a decade old).
My positions are difficult to budge because I have actually given them a great deal of though, and may be hard to follow because I have arrived at many Left positions through what is probably traditionally conservative reasoning given my upbringing. In terms of outcomes I believe the Left generally serves the causes of justice, individuality and freedom better in practical terms than the Right usually does (hell even on matters of free expression and censorship the left is usually no worse than the Right in practice, the Right just talk a better game these days thanks to Libertarians but are still their usual selves in practice).
You really need to ditch the idea that anyone who disagrees with you is fundamentally moronic or being deliberately obtuse or insufficiently educated on the topic if you want to win anyone to your cause, and if you truly believe someone lacks valuable information I suggest providing it rather than being aggressive.
