Sandow's promos post-Mizdow were fucking terrible.Dream, The Sandow vs Eli Drake promo has highlighted to me that E-li Drake schools Sandow on the microphone. Which says to me that the TNA quality of promo is just of a greater quality than the WWE one when Sandow as supposed to be 'one of the good ones'
Sandow's promos post-Mizdow were fucking terrible.
Legitimately had to turn it off. People forget how bad that was.Worse than The Old Day.
Just repeating what the other person was saying in an annoying voice like he's 5 years old.
Menome's Predictions for tomorrow:
Alicia Fox
The Club
Cesaro
Sasha Banks
Roman Reigns
Kevin Owens
Go out and bet on the opposite now!
5. Orange
4. Re:Zero -Starting Life in Another World-
3. Detective versus Detectives
2. Mob Psycho 100
1. Great Teacher Onizuka (2012 drama)
HIATUS FAVE FIVE:
5. Orange
4. Re:Zero -Starting Life in Another World-
3. Detective versus Detectives
2. Mob Psycho 100
1. Great Teacher Onizuka (2012 drama)
HIATUS FAVE FIVE:
5. Orange
4. Re:Zero -Starting Life in Another World-
3. Detective versus Detectives
2. Mob Psycho 100
1. Great Teacher Onizuka (2012 drama)
I find it hard to do any kind of real fav five because I don't actually really give too much of a shit about in-ring performance. Sure, I like to watch Cesaro and AJ wrestle more than I like to watch Ambrose or Big Show, because it's more immediately exciting - but it leaves no lasting imprint on me at all, really, just to witness impressive pro wrestling. And honestly, half the time, I can't tell bad from good. I seriously don't see what is so good about Bret Hart vs Stone Cold at WM13. It's boring to me! So slow. I enjoyed D Bry's wrestlemania 30 run but I'm not like, astounded by his little kicks. What makes him so good? I could be made to understand it, but I'll never feel it.
To me the in ring stuff is like a passing curiosity. No matter the era - pre-Attitude era stuff I look into now, Attitude Era, the Lapsed Era (which I think is an appropriate name for Post WM17 - 20?? you choose, maybe it continues) and now.
Pretty much the only situations where I'll sit and watch a match all the way are a) if i'm watching it live and therefore cannot skip through it (in which case I'll just leave it on in the background) or b) in the rare case when I have emotional investment in the ongoing developments beyond just 'who wins'.
But b) only happens 6 or 7 times a year since I came back to wrestling in 2014.
I suppose there is also novelty that sometimes catches my eye - ie Shinsuke's first match in the WWE, very entertaining. Haven't really sat down like that and watched closely since though. Or the cruiserweight match on RAW - there's definitely more to see there before I've seen it all so I'll keep an eye on this.
The truth is, wrestling itself IS boring, the second you know it is fake. I don't watch wrestling, I follow it. I don't know why but the business of it continues to fascinate me - booking decisions, controversies, the anatomy of the shows from lighting to match stipulations.
I spend probably 1-2 hours total on a non-PPV week actually watching wrestling and probably about 10 hours reading about it. Today I spent half the afternoon going through the wikipedia page of every New Generation PPV.
It really is the weirdest thing. I wonder why I manage to be interested in the production of a television show I am not interested enough in to watch. It's only when things completely out of the ordinary happen that I need to tune in and see. An unexpected title change. The return of a suspended superstar, how will they be presented. Etc.
But wrestling? It's all the same. After I see two or three matches by any wrestler, I never need to see another one unless they're doing something nuts like jumping off Hell In A Cell. The whole storytelling thing - it's the same story in the ring every time. I really don't see what working a particular limb adds to it beyond a little extra verisimilitude.
Anyone else?
I find it hard to do any kind of real fav five because I don't actually really give too much of a shit about in-ring performance. Sure, I like to watch Cesaro and AJ wrestle more than I like to watch Ambrose or Big Show, because it's more immediately exciting - but it leaves no lasting imprint on me at all, really, just to witness impressive pro wrestling. And honestly, half the time, I can't tell bad from good. I seriously don't see what is so good about Bret Hart vs Stone Cold at WM13. It's boring to me! So slow. I enjoyed D Bry's wrestlemania 30 run but I'm not like, astounded by his little kicks. What makes him so good? I could be made to understand it, but I'll never feel it.
To me the in ring stuff is like a passing curiosity. No matter the era - pre-Attitude era stuff I look into now, Attitude Era, the Lapsed Era (which I think is an appropriate name for Post WM17 - 20?? you choose, maybe it continues) and now.
Pretty much the only situations where I'll sit and watch a match all the way are a) if i'm watching it live and therefore cannot skip through it (in which case I'll just leave it on in the background) or b) in the rare case when I have emotional investment in the ongoing developments beyond just 'who wins'.
But b) only happens 6 or 7 times a year since I came back to wrestling in 2014.
I suppose there is also novelty that sometimes catches my eye - ie Shinsuke's first match in the WWE, very entertaining. Haven't really sat down like that and watched closely since though. Or the cruiserweight match on RAW - there's definitely more to see there before I've seen it all so I'll keep an eye on this.
The truth is, wrestling itself IS boring, the second you know it is fake. I don't watch wrestling, I follow it. I don't know why but the business of it continues to fascinate me - booking decisions, controversies, the anatomy of the shows from lighting to match stipulations.
I spend probably 1-2 hours total on a non-PPV week actually watching wrestling and probably about 10 hours reading about it. Today I spent half the afternoon going through the wikipedia page of every New Generation PPV.
It really is the weirdest thing. I wonder why I manage to be interested in the production of a television show I am not interested enough in to watch. It's only when things completely out of the ordinary happen that I need to tune in and see. An unexpected title change. The return of a suspended superstar, how will they be presented. Etc.
But wrestling? It's all the same. After I see two or three matches by any wrestler, I never need to see another one unless they're doing something nuts like jumping off Hell In A Cell. The whole storytelling thing - it's the same story in the ring every time. I really don't see what working a particular limb adds to it beyond a little extra verisimilitude.
Anyone else?
70s man, way too old for someone as hip as me.None of those are the newly-released Female Prisoner No.701 collection.
Re:Zero and Mob Psycho are great. Re:Zero does an amazing job of giving you every shitty anime protag and then grinding him to pieces until he starts being good.
I find it hard to do any kind of real fav five because I don't actually really give too much of a shit about in-ring performance. Sure, I like to watch Cesaro and AJ wrestle more than I like to watch Ambrose or Big Show, because it's more immediately exciting - but it leaves no lasting imprint on me at all, really, just to witness impressive pro wrestling. And honestly, half the time, I can't tell bad from good. I seriously don't see what is so good about Bret Hart vs Stone Cold at WM13. It's boring to me! So slow. I enjoyed D Bry's wrestlemania 30 run but I'm not like, astounded by his little kicks. What makes him so good? I could be made to understand it, but I'll never feel it.
To me the in ring stuff is like a passing curiosity. No matter the era - pre-Attitude era stuff I look into now, Attitude Era, the Lapsed Era (which I think is an appropriate name for Post WM17 - 20?? you choose, maybe it continues) and now.
Pretty much the only situations where I'll sit and watch a match all the way are a) if i'm watching it live and therefore cannot skip through it (in which case I'll just leave it on in the background) or b) in the rare case when I have emotional investment in the ongoing developments beyond just 'who wins'.
But b) only happens 6 or 7 times a year since I came back to wrestling in 2014.
I suppose there is also novelty that sometimes catches my eye - ie Shinsuke's first match in the WWE, very entertaining. Haven't really sat down like that and watched closely since though. Or the cruiserweight match on RAW - there's definitely more to see there before I've seen it all so I'll keep an eye on this.
The truth is, wrestling itself IS boring, the second you know it is fake. I don't watch wrestling, I follow it. I don't know why but the business of it continues to fascinate me - booking decisions, controversies, the anatomy of the shows from lighting to match stipulations.
I spend probably 1-2 hours total on a non-PPV week actually watching wrestling and probably about 10 hours reading about it. Today I spent half the afternoon going through the wikipedia page of every New Generation PPV.
It really is the weirdest thing. I wonder why I manage to be interested in the production of a television show I am not interested enough in to watch. It's only when things completely out of the ordinary happen that I need to tune in and see. An unexpected title change. The return of a suspended superstar, how will they be presented. Etc.
But wrestling? It's all the same. After I see two or three matches by any wrestler, I never need to see another one unless they're doing something nuts like jumping off Hell In A Cell. The whole storytelling thing - it's the same story in the ring every time. I really don't see what working a particular limb adds to it beyond a little extra verisimilitude.
Anyone else?
I'm ringside to a kickboxing event.
No shooting here
I mean there's not much counterpoint because you clearly aren't that interested in in ring work that much apart from spectacle. So any arguments will be about those little details or athleticism in a match aren't really gonna hold much water.
I stopped reading in the first sentence because he said he doesn't care about the actual wrestling. Which is fine, but yeah, personally I watch for the wrestling.I'm not reading all that no matter how many times yall quote it #Shootember
I find it hard to do any kind of real fav five because I don't actually really give too much of a shit about in-ring performance. Sure, I like to watch Cesaro and AJ wrestle more than I like to watch Ambrose or Big Show, because it's more immediately exciting - but it leaves no lasting imprint on me at all, really, just to witness impressive pro wrestling. And honestly, half the time, I can't tell bad from good. I seriously don't see what is so good about Bret Hart vs Stone Cold at WM13. It's boring to me! So slow. I enjoyed D Bry's wrestlemania 30 run but I'm not like, astounded by his little kicks. What makes him so good? I could be made to understand it, but I'll never feel it.
To me the in ring stuff is like a passing curiosity. No matter the era - pre-Attitude era stuff I look into now, Attitude Era, the Lapsed Era (which I think is an appropriate name for Post WM17 - 20?? you choose, maybe it continues) and now.
Pretty much the only situations where I'll sit and watch a match all the way are a) if i'm watching it live and therefore cannot skip through it (in which case I'll just leave it on in the background) or b) in the rare case when I have emotional investment in the ongoing developments beyond just 'who wins'.
But b) only happens 6 or 7 times a year since I came back to wrestling in 2014.
I suppose there is also novelty that sometimes catches my eye - ie Shinsuke's first match in the WWE, very entertaining. Haven't really sat down like that and watched closely since though. Or the cruiserweight match on RAW - there's definitely more to see there before I've seen it all so I'll keep an eye on this.
The truth is, wrestling itself IS boring, the second you know it is fake. I don't watch wrestling, I follow it. I don't know why but the business of it continues to fascinate me - booking decisions, controversies, the anatomy of the shows from lighting to match stipulations.
I spend probably 1-2 hours total on a non-PPV week actually watching wrestling and probably about 10 hours reading about it. Today I spent half the afternoon going through the wikipedia page of every New Generation PPV.
It really is the weirdest thing. I wonder why I manage to be interested in the production of a television show I am not interested enough in to watch. It's only when things completely out of the ordinary happen that I need to tune in and see. An unexpected title change. The return of a suspended superstar, how will they be presented. Etc.
But wrestling? It's all the same. After I see two or three matches by any wrestler, I never need to see another one unless they're doing something nuts like jumping off Hell In A Cell. The whole storytelling thing - it's the same story in the ring every time. I really don't see what working a particular limb adds to it beyond a little extra verisimilitude.
Anyone else?
On the subject I've always cared way more about promos & storylines compared to the in ring wrestling.
I care about if the match has any heat, then the work rate, then the story.On the subject I've always cared way more about promos & storylines compared to the in ring wrestling.
I care about if the match has any heat, then the work rate, then the story.
For example Hogan Rock X8 is fucking amazing.
Creating those moments is why wrestling is great.
There's truth in this.I generally find much of WWE's in-ring output to be very samey, it's all so homogenised and with the squeaky clean production it doesn't do much for me these days. You want in-ring storytelling, watch something else.
I care about if the match has any heat, then the work rate, then the story.
For example Hogan Rock X8 is fucking amazing.
Creating those moments is why wrestling is great.
WWE has come to an agreement on the release of Goldust (Dustin Runnels) as of today, June 14, 2006. WWE wishes Dustin the best in all future endeavors.
On the subject I've always cared way more about promos & storylines compared to the in ring wrestling.