Skyward Sword review thread [Newest Reviews - Cubed3 10/10, GC: A, AusGamers: 7/10]

With reviews coming in........its so close, i can feel it. Its as if the game is just tucked in over the horizon and all I have to do is reach. That's what these out stretched arms mean right?
 
Despite comments from Bill Trinen [at comic-con], you still find the typical "find item, use against boss" formula in this game.

Kind of glad. They may be simple, but I love these fights. Twilight Princess did a great job with them. I assume we have a mix of puzzle-boss/sword fight boss this time around though.
 
Every positive review is going to call it the best Zelda ever. That doesn't mean shit.

Nonetheless, HYPE

Still a month away ; _ ;
 
LiquidMetal14 said:
Every Zelda game gets the "best Zelda game" type statements prior to launch. I think it's partly nostalgia at work.

Ummm that is not how the Zelda cycle works.

When a new game is release, there is a lot of hype initially, but then the hate starts and the previous entry becomes the best Zelda ever. WW and MM have received much more love since the release of TP.
 
amtentori said:
Ummm that is not how the Zelda cycle works.

When a new game is release, there is a lot of hype initially, but then the hate starts and the previous entry becomes the best Zelda ever. WW and MM have received much more love since the release of TP.

I think that falls in line with what he's saying. Prior to launch, the new one gets hyped up. A bit after, that cycle kicks in.
 
King of the Potato People said:
Admittedly it's so old but I cannot recall that being written about MM in the run up to its release because it was so diverse with fans at the time, and that's still the one I consider the best because it's so trippy,
Pretty sure that Majora's Mask wasn't called "best Zelda" by any part of the press at the time of its release. The shadow of the game-changing OoT was far too huge at that time -- and the gameplay of Majora's Mask was always rather controversal. I don't think that Wind Waker got much of the "Best Zelda" treatment either.

So, yeah, I think that Twilight Princess was the first Zelda post-OoT that was commonly hyped up to be the best Zelda ever.
 
Celine said:
First time ?
50-55 hours but I try to enjoy as much as I can on my first playthrough.

No idea how some gaffer can complete it with 25 hours the first try.

I completed TP in 55 hours. So I hope 35 hours for that reviewer actually means 60 hours for me.
 
apana said:
This stuff about 35 hours for the main quest sounds a little on the low side though. How much time did it take these people to complete the main quest in Twilight Princess?

45 hours to do everything on my TP save, no guide. Minus a couple heart pieces I didn't have the urgency to finish out.

Probably about 25-30 of that was dedicated to the critical path and the rest was spent on the horrible and pointless optional collectibles.
 
The first site to give this an 8 because they're tired of Zelda/too cool for Nintendo games gets burned to the ground. I'm serious, nothing but ashes left.
 
Orayn said:
Ask Cheech why he thinks Zelda fans are just like My Little Pony Fans for a double dose of hilarity.

OH NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

I hope EDGE has a review in next issue, can't wait to see what they have to say.
 
LiquidMetal14 said:
Every Zelda game gets the "best Zelda game" type statements prior to launch. I think it's partly nostalgia at work.

I feel like this is a double-edged sword.

I mean it also means that the game isn't only judged on its own merits but how it compares to other games in the series. And when one of those games is generally perceived as "one of the greatest games of all-time" it really does leave you with big shoes to fill.
 
That review information regarding the dungeon designs, worryingly it makes them sound underdeveloped.

The dungeons were bloody good in Twilight Princess, they redeemed it from its shortcomings. Their expansive layouts are still engraved into my brain. Skyward Sword looks to go in the opposite direction, with more effort sprinkled around the other aspects of the design. There's going to be interesting parallels when the time comes in a month or so.
 
Andrex said:
The only review I guess I would really pay attention to is Eurogamer's. The rest will either hype it up because it's Nintendo, or score it low because lol waggle SD.
Also Edge's. Edge isn't afraid to tell it like it is, no matter how hyped the game in question may be. (Though Edge can occasionally be a little too harsh - as Eurogamer can occasionally be a little too generous - so between those two sites and Internet chatter I usually figure out enough about a game to make purchasing decisions if I'm unsure. It should be noted that this is the first Zelda for which a purchasing decision has been unsure for me.)
 
apana said:
This stuff about 35 hours for the main quest sounds a little on the low side though. How much time did it take these people to complete the main quest in Twilight Princess?
Yeah, I mean it took me 56 hours to beat TP and I didnt even bother with getting 100%.
 
Had to buy a new PC and because of it I'm stupid poor, and as such I've had to make cutbacks on the games I pre-order.

This is one of three games that didn't get the chop, so hype is at least at a million right now. It best be the damn finest Zelda game I've ever played.
 
gatotsu911 said:
Also Edge's. Edge isn't afraid to tell it like it is, no matter how hyped the game in question may be. (Though Edge can occasionally be a little too harsh - as Eurogamer can occasionally be a little too generous - so between those two sites and Internet chatter I usually figure out enough about a game to make purchasing decisions if I'm unsure. It should be noted that this is the first Zelda for which a purchasing decision has been unsure for me.)
Edge once put their balls on the table and gave GTA III a [6], the net decried in unison: "wat" then Edge took their balls of their table and gave it a more safer score of [8] claiming their original score was a "typo". Yes they wanted us to believe they made A TYPO SCORE ON ONE OF THE BIGGEST GAMES OF ALL TIME! It's still worth laughing at.
 
thecouncil said:
seriously.

oh well.

i re-ordered the basic version. used some credit and points... got it down to $13.

i really wanted that controller though.

oh, what could have been. haha.

Bro, you can still get it...pre-order it else where. Not to mention, brick and mortar stores will have first run stock as well.
 
flintstryker said:
Man this generation has really fuck up people's expectation on the length of games.
Some people have gotten used to getting cosy and finishing a different game every afternoon, perhaps with a few cups of coffee in between. It really is that bad.
 
35 hours it's fine for me if the game actually takes 35 hours.

When Twilight Princess, I read many times that it would last 70 hours (100 with sidequests), and my final numbers were 35 (end game) and 60 (100%).

I'm satisfied with that.
 
wrowa said:
Pretty sure that Majora's Mask wasn't called "best Zelda" by any part of the press at the time of its release. The shadow of the game-changing OoT was far too huge at that time -- and the gameplay of Majora's Mask was always rather controversal.
Regarding Majora's Mask, media had cold feet with the game, the attention was centered on the PS2. It was the only thing in people's mind at that time. No matter how good Majora's was or how many sweet games the DreamCast had, it was allPS2 and it's shity line up.
 
Anything over 20 hours is massive nowadays.

Refreshment.01 said:
Regarding Majora's Mask, media had cold feet with the game, the attention was centered on the PS2. It was the only thing in people's mind at that time. No matter how good Majora's was or how many sweet games the DreamCast had, it was allPS2 and it's shity line up.

Majora isn't as fluid of an experience as OoT was. Some might think it's better, but I can see it been much more frustrating for most of the non-HC gamers at the time. Also it just wasn't as a massive leap as OoT was from the previous Zelda...

Well I think no Zelda game can ever be actually.
 
zoukka said:
Anything over 20 hours is massive nowadays.



Majora isn't as fluid of an experience as OoT was. Some might think it's better, but I can see it been much more frustrating for most of the non-HC gamers at the time. Also it just wasn't as a massive leap as OoT was from the previous Zelda...

Well I think no Zelda game can ever be actually.
Zelda HD MMO, no ?
 
I remember the time when 20 minutes was considered massive. 35 Hours is, and always has been, absolutely massive. Yall have skewed memories because you played Baldur's Gate first or something. But games that size was just a very short moment in gaming history, and not representative at all.
 
spekkeh said:
I remember the time when 20 minutes was considered massive. 35 Hours is, and always has been, absolutely massive. Yall have skewed memories because you played Baldur's Gate first or something. But games that size was just a very short moment in gaming history, and not representative at all.
People are just disappointed after Xenoblade having 100 hours. (can't believe people beat it in 60)
 
I don't know if someone has already said but the next issue of EDGE is due out the 25th, but should arrive Monday or even maybe Saturday for subscribers.

I want it just because I know the cover is going to look cool.
 
BUT IS IT DIFFICULT? Or even remotely so.

Twilight Princess just felt like i was pressing the win button all the way through. C'mon man i'm really hoping this one won't let me down.
 
Funny that the review doesn't mention the medals and their effects. Or is it Kotaku getting it wrong again?
 
Smelly Tramp said:
BUT IS IT DIFFICULT? Or even remotely so.

Twilight Princess just felt like i was pressing the win button all the way through. C'mon man i'm really hoping this one won't let me down.


You start with 6 hearts, purely because of the increase in difficulty. Sounds promising.
 
IceDoesntHelp said:
People are just disappointed after Xenoblade having 100 hours. (can't believe people beat it in 60)
That size just put me off buying it. I really don't even know where to start looking for that amount of time to spend on a game.
 
King of the Potato People said:
Edge once put their balls on the table and gave GTA III a [6], the net decried in unison: "wat" then Edge took their balls of their table and gave it a more safer score of [8] claiming their original score was a "typo". Yes they wanted us to believe they made A TYPO SCORE ON ONE OF THE BIGGEST GAMES OF ALL TIME! It's still worth laughing at.

this cannot be real!
 
spekkeh said:
That size just put me off buying it. I really don't even know where to start looking for that amount of time to spend on a game.

Heh. Well with that attitude, fine - you're missing out on what I can safely say is the best game I've ever played.

I finished it in 70 hours. Played on it for like, 5 hours a day. No biggie.
 
The average action/shooter is 8-10 hours
The average adventure game is 20
The average RPG 30-40

If the reviewer said it took 15 hours to complete I'd be "worried" but 35 hours is plenty fine and pretty typical.

I just finished OOT, it didn't take me longer then 15 hours to finish it. Granted I have played it before.
 
rFtXn.jpg

MAH BOI
 
zoukka said:
Anything over 20 hours is massive nowadays.



Majora isn't as fluid of an experience as OoT was. Some might think it's better, but I can see it been much more frustrating for most of the non-HC gamers at the time. Also it just wasn't as a massive leap as OoT was from the previous Zelda...

Well I think no Zelda game can ever be actually.

I'd argue, gameplay wise, the jump from OOT to MM was larger than OOT to LTTP.

Maybe not. But the leap between OOT and MM is underestimated. Compare OOT to MM, then to TP. Yeah.
 
The Dutch Slayer said:
I'll fully admit that I'm not that great at video game playing.
And TP took me a long time because I wanted to do most of the extra things on my own without a guide or anything.

Don't feel bad, you just played the old school way, without having a guide open to look at when you're stuck for five seconds or longer.

I play the same way, it's much more rewarding.

More on topic, I'm starting to feel hopeful for this title. I've purposely avoided much of the recent coverage.
 
richisawesome said:
Heh. Well with that attitude, fine - you're missing out on what I can safely say is the best game I've ever played.

I finished it in 70 hours. Played on it for like, 5 hours a day. No biggie.
Yeah, after work and with the missus I have about 1 hour a day max. Taking more than seventy days straight to finish a game (probably a lot longer as I don't game every day) is just no fun at all. You lose track of the story and consequently interest in the game pretty fast.
 
It's true that Edge's reputation may have been a bit sullied thanks to slightly excessive 10s over the years (GTA4, Halo 3, SMG2, etc.), however, I think we can all agree that a 10 from Edge is slightly more credible than a 98 from ONM.
 
Top Bottom