reKon said:ya so like I said:
September 8th
Loudninja said:Look at it this way either we there will be a $299 PS3.
-PXG- said:Wut? :lol
And how are you STILL A Junior? How?
-PXG- said:Wut? :lol
And how are you STILL A Junior? How?
-PXG- said:Wut? :lol
And how are you STILL A Junior? How?
gofreak said:One theory I was entertaining was that Sony was retooling existing 80GB inventory to 160GBs that they could continue to sell, with games, for $399 while pitching the Slim at some point under that.
Would fit with the Ars mole's information that the 80GB would dry up but 160GB supply would remain unconstrained for the time being.
Reboxing 80GBs as 160GB bundles would let them keep selling those machines at $399 - i.e. without a massive extra loss.
Loudninja said:Because I have to be
-PXG- said:Hmmm. The "new" Elite and the 80 GB PS3 are going to be the same price. Is there a chance that the PS3 Slim will be Sony's answer the the 360 Arcade? Is there a chance that Slim will be $199? If Sony can set a price that is competitive to the 360, things will get VERY interesting.
Loudninja said:Look at it this way either way there will be a $299 PS3.
-PXG- said:Hmmm. The "new" Elite and the 80 GB PS3 are going to be the same price. Is there a chance that the PS3 Slim will be Sony's answer the the 360 Arcade? Is there a chance that Slim will be $199? If Sony can set a price that is competitive to the 360, things will get VERY interesting.
Also...
Did you ever get a better internet connection. I remember people on PS3F saying you were never online because you had a shitty connection :lol
Guy Legend said:Even if they just stuck with the phats and dropped to $299, everyone wins.
lowrider007 said:You'd think that would be the case wouldn't you , but trust me, there's people on here that won't be happy until the PS3 that is @ the 360 arcade price, as if these people were ever going to buy a PS3.
-PXG- said:Hmmm. The "new" Elite and the 80 GB PS3 are going to be the same price. Is there a chance that the PS3 Slim will be Sony's answer the the 360 Arcade? Is there a chance that Slim will be $199? If Sony can set a price that is competitive to the 360, things will get VERY interesting.
Sentry said:Pretty much, whatever happens at this point you will be able to pick up a PS3 this holiday at $299, whether or not it's a slim is what's in question atm.. Either way, Sony really needs to go the Apple route in terms of keeping secrets till the last minute. Seriously Sony, you have failed big time. :lol
HUELEN10 said:
PS3 game packaging appears to have changed drastically!
-PXG- said:Hmmm. The "new" Elite and the 80 GB PS3 are going to be the same price. Is there a chance that the PS3 Slim will be Sony's answer the the 360 Arcade? Is there a chance that Slim will be $199? If Sony can set a price that is competitive to the 360, things will get VERY interesting.
Sentry said:Pretty much, whatever happens at this point you will be able to pick up a PS3 this holiday at $299, whether or not it's a slim is what's in question atm.. Either way, Sony really needs to go the Apple route in terms of keeping secrets till the last minute. Seriously Sony, you have failed big time. :lol
TheExecutive said:He is an inspiration to all!:lol
Loudninja
King of the Juniors
(Today, 08:49 AM)
Reply | Quote
Loudninja said:Look at it this way either way there will be a $299 PS3.
D'oh! moment...? :lolspwolf said:sony should keep their price drops secret so people dont know that ps3 can be gotten at lower price?
Tom Penny said::lol
HUELEN10 said:
PS3 game packaging appears to have changed drastically!
Sentry said:D'oh! moment...? :lol
If people see a new model or a price cut incoming then many will not go out and buy, what im saying is don't let a new SKU or a price drop leak months before you even plan on announcing it.
-PXG- said:It was a rhetorical question. Sadly, I already know the answer
cyberheater said:I think if you guys are not getting a PS3 'cause you think the slim is just around the corner, then you're going to be waiting for a long long time.
Wait for a price cut by all means but don't wait for a slim because it's not going to happen anytime soon...
-PXG- said:It was a rhetorical question. Sadly, I already know the answer
gofreak said:One theory I was entertaining was that Sony was retooling existing 80GB inventory to 160GBs that they could continue to sell, with games, for $399 while pitching the Slim at some point under that.
Would fit with the Ars mole's information that the 80GB would dry up but 160GB supply would remain unconstrained for the time being.
Reboxing 80GBs as 160GB bundles would let them keep selling those machines at $399 - i.e. without a massive extra loss.
lowrider007 said:What are you basing this on ?
TouchMyBox said:I thought Kaako appointed himself that position.
TheExecutive said:Oh... how about this?
Loudninja
Queen of the Juniors
(Today, 08:49 AM)
Reply | Quote
cyberheater said:On common sense. Sony should be spending all there effort and resource in trying to make the existing PS3 as cheap to manufacture as possible. When they have completed on all die shrinks, combined as many chips as possible and reduced cost to the barest minimum, well, then you'll see your slim. I think we talking a couple of years time.
I was referring to the slim, it has been known for many months. As for pricing, that has also been know for some time, especially with the slim surfacing it is assumed a new pricing bracket will accompany it.spwolf said:was the price leaked "months" before "they even plan on announcing it"?
If months=weeks, then yes... otherwise, a month ago everyone though Slim is launching at $399 for sure. Heck, half of the juniors still think it is.
as to the leaks, i am pretty sure that Sony likes being in the media
Massa said:The small stock of fats left by September will be sold for 299 with bundled games and the slim will be (I hope) 299 with no bundled games.
You're right, but the thing is why the hell would Sony shelf a 120GB slim and a 160GB phat @ $299 and $399 respectively?
TheExecutive said:Oh... how about this?
Loudninja
Queen of the Juniors
(Today, 08:49 AM)
Reply | Quote
Approved.TheExecutive said:Loudninja
Queen of the Juniors
(Today, 08:49 AM)
Reply | Quote
Wait wait wait wait, WHAT!?!? :lol :lol :lolcyberheater said:On common sense. Sony should be spending all there effort and resource in trying to make the existing PS3 as cheap to manufacture as possible. When they have completed on all die shrinks, combined as many chips as possible and reduced cost to the barest minimum, well, then you'll see your slim. I think we talking a couple of years time.
Loudninja said:Look at it this way either way there will be a $299 PS3.
gcubed said:so you're talking completely out of your ass.
Why are people still shocked by the slim being released? I didnt think it was even a question anymore, the conversation has moved on to the price, not if it exists.
cyberheater said:Really. Then show me the evidence. All i've seen are whole load of blurred pictures and photoshops...
There is no evolution here, you can't magically shrink everything into a smaller case at a cheaper price without having the history of die shrinks, combining multiple chip functions etc... It doesn't work like that.
WTF that's so NORMAL. And too much like Xbox 360... This better be only for PSN titles.HUELEN10 said:
PS3 game packaging appears to have changed drastically!
cyberheater said:Really. Then show me the evidence. All i've seen are whole load of blurred pictures and photoshops...
There is no evolution here, you can't magically shrink everything into a smaller case at a cheaper price without having the history of die shrinks, combining multiple chip functions etc... It doesn't work like that.
cyberheater said:Really. Then show me the evidence. All i've seen are whole load of blurred pictures and photoshops...
There is no evolution here, you can't magically shrink everything into a smaller case at a cheaper price without having the history of die shrinks, combining multiple chip functions etc... It doesn't work like that.
This is GAF, dude. Believe.cyberheater said:Really. Then show me the evidence. All i've seen are whole load of blurred pictures and photoshops...
There is no evolution here, you can't magically shrink everything into a smaller case at a cheaper price without having the history of die shrinks, combining multiple chip functions etc... It doesn't work like that.
Wow.. are you serious? I suggest re-reading the entire history of this thread, and if you still think it's all rubbish, then I must say you're a fool bro.cyberheater said:Really. Then show me the evidence. All i've seen are whole load of blurred pictures and photoshops...
There is no evolution here, you can't magically shrink everything into a smaller case at a cheaper price without having the history of die shrinks, combining multiple chip functions etc... It doesn't work like that.
plasmasd said:
cyberheater said:Really. Then show me the evidence. All i've seen are whole load of blurred pictures and photoshops...
There is no evolution here, you can't magically shrink everything into a smaller case at a cheaper price without having the history of die shrinks, combining multiple chip functions etc... It doesn't work like that.