Triforce141
Member
I don't think they did.
If anything, putting in Simon Belmont as a fighter and a Mii outfit that looks very similar to Captain N's jacket would make more sense since you would get 2 birds with 1 stone that way.
I don't think they did.
Thats true. Tho I'd wonder why Inklings would cause a stir. Seems like everyone wants the, to me.Everyone can cause a stir but they're all different kinds.
Captain N Belmont is the only konami substitute I will allow.
The only characters I don't like are Fox, Falco, Wario, Shiek, and Marth.
...and thats he reason I don't like playing as Marth, because there no reason when Lucina is in the game since I like her character more.
Not even Bomberman?
https://twitter.com/Stealth___
https://twitter.com/therealzef
https://twitter.com/RogersBase
These guys have been tweeting the most about it today. The source seems to stem from the third one though. The latter two have a bit of a hand in the Smash community and I know at least Warchamp7 seems to be believing it - though they are telling people not to overhype themselves despite the news supposedly being pretty hype.
But like my spoiler implies, my Inkling comment is really only a rose-tinted view of it lmao
I remember a quote from Sakurai saying that it actually doesn't take him too long to envision the movesets for characters, just the programming takes long -- obviously.Sakurai wants to bring in characters who add something new and unique to the game, and loves bringing in mechanics from the source games for characters. Inklings will be totally unique because they'll be bringing their ink mechanics with them- with the caveat that the ink will probably fade away after a few seconds or something like that. I doubt they'd let it stick around permanently but you want the Inkling to be able to take advantage of laying it down.
I would like a Castlevania character too, but to me it'd have to bee Alucard, Soma Cruz or Shanoa (100% impossible). If Simon Belmont is the only option, I will take Bomberman instead (with Super Bomberman 3/4 music, please).
Have these guys had insider information before? I'm not familiar with them.
Have these guys had insider information before? I'm not familiar with them.
That was back during the Brawl days. Now he actually does have NoA sources.Wait, Wii Will Rock U, the guy who made that fake twitter about Layton being in Brawl or whatever? No, no, we're not listening to him, are we?
I feel like the Inklings would be 3rd or 4th (granted, it's not an election, but you get my point). Some may have felt discouraged to vote for the Inklings because of the Mii Costumes or didn't because it was a foregone conclusion that they would get in eventually (mostly the latter). But they would make the most noise of all of the potential ballot characters on social media.....except maybe King K. Rool, but he has a good shot at being #1.Considering they've invested in a million dollar Japanese eSports Tournament for Splatoon, it makes the most sense to pull from there. Chibi Robo isn't going anywhere and while Wolf is logical, it sounds like a newcomer.
But I'm VERY interested to see how Inkling would play if it was them.
All I remember is that RogersBase is the guy who begged so much to not get banned on neogaf because he love the community so much. But his Professor Layton and Luke Twitter is pretty amazing tho.
That's because you're clearly forgetting about this nintendo character...
I think GameXplain's Andre would die if he appeared in smash
But in the case of the Inklings, their Mii Costumes came off more as a quick means to promote Splatoon than something to appease ballot voters.I don't believe the rumor, but if it is real, I'm betting on either Inkling or K. Rool. Those are the only Nintendo newcomers who would generate social a lot of media buzz. The third guy, RealZef, said it's probably not the ballot winner because that means they would have started this character before the ballot ended. I think Inkling is more likely to be pre-ballot than K. Rool, but it could possibly go the other way. One getting in would be good for the other, since they're both popular ballot picks that have been turned into Mii costumes.
I'm going with Inkling.
What has he found out before?That was back during the Brawl days. Now he actually does have NoA sources.
I gotta say, I felt a little bad for him haha. Kinda sucks that the ban was perma, or at least that they didn't give him amnesty after like six years.
But in the case of the Inklings, their Mii Costumes came off more as a quick means to promote Splatoon than something to appease ballot voters.
But in the case of the Inklings, their Mii Costumes came off more as a quick means to promote Splatoon than something to appease ballot voters.
At the same time, I don't think K. Rool has "trending power" like the Inklings or even Waluigi.
Not once did I say that King K. Rool's Mii Costume was added to appease the ballot voters. I only said that the Inklings were definitely not made for that reason due to the fact that their costumes were announced before the release of Splatoon.How do we know that the K. Rool costume wasn't meant to "appease" fans of K. Rool while they're busy at work on the real thing? Both costumes cost money, and the Inkling costume even comes with a trophy. We know jack shit. For all we know, Assist Trophies are eligible to become playable characters and Sakurai is working on Waluigi as we speak. Stop making up rules and assumptions every five minutes. The speculation scene is going to give me an aneurysm.
Not once did I say that King K. Rool's Mii Costume was added to appease the ballot voters. I only said that the Inklings were definitely not made for that reason due to the fact that their costumes were announced before the release of Splatoon.
...and thats he reason I don't like playing as Marth, because there no reason when Lucina is in the game since I like her character more.
Roy is different enough from Lucina so I don't dislike playing as him. I guess I'd add Pit to that list since he's basically Dark Pit.
People keep setting up arbitrary rules for this and Sakurai continuously proves them wrong. If Sakurai decides to make K Rool or Inklings a full fledged character, he will. Having a Mii costume isn't some disqualifier.
As recently as last week, Sakurai broke the "no returning music on DLC stages" rule that the fans arbitrarily made up, so I look forward to the meltdowns when they start adding "ineligible" characters like Ridley and Tingle as DLC.
Neither do I, but to those who may argue for it, the reason I say before the release of Splatoon is because most of the Inklings' popularity came after the release of their game. But let's be honest, Sakurai probably made his ballot picks months ago if he plans on adding ballot characters as soon as November (or maybe sooner).That doesn't matter. They were announced before the release of Splatoon, but after the start of the ballot. Both the Inkling and K. Rool were given Mii costumes before the ballot ended. How is that fair to either character? Hint: It's not, which is why I think both characters are coming. What if Sakurai saw an extremely creative K. Rool moveset in August and loved it so much that he had to use it? "Ah phooey, I guess we can't add him since he's already a costume. Better luck next time!"
I don't believe in the consolation prize theory, but either he's coming or they do in fact hate the character and they wanted to get his "deconfirmation" out of the way as quickly as possible, which is why NOBODY ELSE has been deconfirmed yet. Hate is a strong word, but considering that no other popular ballot frontrunners have been deconfirmed and the K. Rool costume was revealed in late July, that's basically an admission that the whole ballot was a sham and they never intended to include K. Rool even if he hypothetically received 100 million votes and dozens of creative moveset submissions. I'm sure some people will argue the costume is "better than nothing", and I don't necessarily disagree with that, but I'll feel terrible if all of our efforts have gone towards a sham ballot that was compromised the moment they started handing out consolation prizes prematurely.
Yeah, even if you buy into this notion that the ballot is just a suggestion box, which it is, singling out a highly requested character before the ballot ended and saying "haha, this is all you get" is an admission that, even if Sakurai saw a cool moveset idea, he would have never implemented it, ergo our input was worthless. I don't know about you, but I think the word "sham" is applicable in this fantasy scenario. Thankfully, none of this matters because I don't believe that the Mii costume means anything.
Having to wait until the end of the ballot to decide to not use a character seems like a pretty arbitrary rule too.
Are you kidding me? Imagine having an election and telling, let's say... Hillary Clinton, that, no matter how many votes she receives, she will not be elected. Period. It's different for Smash in that there isn't a sole "winner" of the ballot, but the principle is the same. Choosing a winner early is fair, but choosing a loser is not. You never know what charming idea Sakurai could find at the last minute. The idea of having early consolation prizes doesn't sit well with me at all, regardless of K. Rool's standing.
This isn't an election, though. It's a suggestion box. There is no guarantee or expectation that any character voted for will get in the game. There are no winners or losers, just characters that inspire Sakurai.
But the Smash Ballot isn't an election, it's a glorified suggestion box. Sakurai may pull from the Top 20 or so, but it's ultimately his call.Are you kidding me? Imagine having an election and telling, let's say... Hillary Clinton, that, no matter how many votes she receives, she will not be elected. Period. It's different for Smash in that there isn't a sole "winner" of the ballot, but the principle is the same. Choosing a winner early is fair, but choosing a loser is not. You never know what charming idea Sakurai could find at the last minute. The idea of having early consolation prizes doesn't sit well with me at all, regardless of K. Rool's standing.