NoblesseOblige
Banned
We are still talking about DOOM here, right?
DOOM doesn't have visual elements?
We are still talking about DOOM here, right?
yay hyperbole
If press outlets don't care about being accurate why do they even exist?So what if it's an inaccurate showing of the game, why do you care?
Do you work for ID?
So what if it's an inaccurate showing of the game, why do you care?
Do you work for ID?
Exactly. Yeah they may be hired for their writing chops first but they're writing about PLAYING games. How people are defending this is beyond me.the car analogy is the more accurate one here
I dont want an F1 driver reviewing a car, I want someone who can at least drive
this doesnt look like someone who plays games
shit man whats with this vendetta sentiment
the thread's about what the thread's about. where do I state otherwise? I ran into this thing and it caught my eye. given the response I wasnt in the wrong
do with it what you want. I think its fucking weird and never encountered something like it to this degree, is all
given Polygon not specifying anything about it in what ive found regarding who's playing it I only knew it came from them
Well, the Conan clips are meant to be humourous. If the Polygon video was meant to be funny, as in "our writer is a first-time player of FPS, here's what happened!" kind of gag, I don't think anyone would have reacted the way they did...a review is about someone's experience with a game and it's valuable to get many different points of view. it shouldn't be about finding the absolute objective review score for a game. not only is that a thing that cannot, will not and has never existed it would be a completely useless metric.
one of my favorite video game review type things has become the clueless gamer segments on conan. it's really interesting getting a layperson's perspective on games.
This pie chart is actually too coherent for Polygon, I'm afraid. Try again!
yay hyperbole
I can agree with this sentiment, yeah. But what's the possibility space of a Doom game? A continuum with "shooting poorly" on one side and "shooting well" on the other?
I'm just discussing the topic and I happen to have an opposing viewpoint. There's no vendetta to worry about.
For what it's worth, the PC version lets you turn off the motion blur, the depth-of-field blur, the film grain, the chromatic aberration... if there's a graphical effect present that's bugging you, there's probably a way to nix it, right in the options menu.
Dunno how much of that carried over to the console versions, though.
Exactly. Yeah they may be hired for their writing chops first but they're writing about PLAYING games. How people are defending this is beyond me.
In my opinion, absolutely. Not saying that the reviewer needs to be an expert in the genre, but a moderate sense of skill and experience should be standard, especially when you take in that reviewers also have to cover the difficulty scope of the game. You don't have to be able to finish the game on its hardest difficulty, but you should at least be able to finish it on the moderate/normal setting that covers the widest range of players.So there needs to be a skill threshold for reviews?
a review is about someone's experience with a game and it's valuable to get many different points of view. it shouldn't be about finding the absolute objective review score for a game. not only is that a thing that cannot, will not and has never existed it would be a completely useless metric.
one of my favorite video game review type things has become the clueless gamer segments on conan. it's really interesting getting a layperson's perspective on games.
I'm worried that you even have that viewpoint. What makes you think that reviewing a game when you can't play it is a good thing? Would you trust a person that can't drive to review a sports car? Because just talking about a car isn't something we need a reviewer for. We need someone that can relay the experience. And that requires having some experience!I'm just discussing the topic and I happen to have an opposing viewpoint. There's no vendetta to worry about.
...Are you ignoring the fact that I highlighted "narrative" in your post?DOOM doesn't have visual elements?
Well, the Conan clips are meant to be humourous. If the Polygon video was meant to be funny, as in "our writer is a first-time player of FPS, here's what happened!" kind of gag, I don't think anyone would have reacted the way they did...
Um, something is up here. I've seen plenty of people from that site stream or play stuff in videos and they're more than competent.
Exactly. Yeah they may be hired for their writing chops first but they're writing about PLAYING games. How people are defending this is beyond me.
Because not all of us only care about views from people with l33t skills.
I see nothing wrong with this - it looks a lot closer from what I see from a majority of people actually playing games than the hardcore base who all have perfect k/d ratios, can talk and play games on camera with zero issues, and never have incorrect knowledge about any video game ever.
Because not all of us only care about views from people with l33t skills.
I see nothing wrong with this - it looks a lot closer from what I see from a majority of people actually playing games than the hardcore base who all have perfect k/d ratios, can talk and play games on camera with zero issues, and never have incorrect knowledge about any video game ever.
People should be allowed and encouraged to play whatever they want. They should also review whatever they want. I want reviews from total novices as well as pros. The whole point of reviews is to get a wide variety of perspectives on a game. Gamers should not be so obsessed with forming a critical narrative about a game.
So there needs to be a skill threshold for reviews?
They then proceeded to disable comments and likes/dislikes, likely due to the immense backlash they probably realised they were going to get.
There are actually people in this topic trying to make the argument that it shouldn't matter if a professional game reviewer has any skill at actually playing games. This is a thing that is happening.
We deserve every ounce of bullshit the industry (devs and press alike) shovels down our throats if this is what it's come to.
No, this is someone who writes (or creates video or similar), it's a creative job, not a professional gamer.are you serious? this is supposed to be someone who plays games for a living and he's struggling to shoot at an enemy who's literally right in front of him
...Are you ignoring the fact that I highlighted "narrative" in your post?
I guess the Polygon hate is strong and some people might be tired of it? I never really got into that. I just think its hard to defend this in the way im presenting it, which isnt much more than "wtf is this"
it doesn't need to be humorous to be valuable. people just straight up hate polygon and will use anything as wedge to be offended.
It's bad play, for sure, but for a "first impressions" preview feature I don't think you need to be skillful or rehearsed. That's where our opinions split, I guess.
No, this is someone who writes (or creates video or similar), it's a creative job, not a professional gamer.
You might expect a high level of skill from this person, but it isn't their job to play games. Thier job is journalism (or at least the enthusiast press version, not necessarily investigative reporting)
No, this is someone who writes (or creates video or similar), it's a creative job, not a professional gamer.
You might expect a high level of skill from this person, but it isn't their job to play games. Thier job is journalism (or at least the enthusiast press version, not necessarily investigative reporting)
The only movie Roger Ebert ever made was a shlocky Roger Corman piece of crap. That doesn't mean his opinions on movies were invalid.
I feel like this isn't really anything Polygon specific though. For some reason so many sites tend to get people who - to put it bluntly - just don't seem to be too hot at games. And obviously as GAF is an enthusiast community with people who play some games for literally hundreds of hours, it can seem like people are utterly dreadful when this is quite reflective of a lot of people IRL.
But it does bum me out because you get situations like Mirror's Edge Catalyst, where early previews were giving some people haemorrhoids because the gameplay looked dreadful and then people actually played the beta and found that it was just people playing the game badly in preview footage.
![]()
It looks like the bad guy just gives up and launches his own head off!