Baconsammy
Banned
Do the racers have win poses? I didn't see any in the videos.
Everyone except Danica since she never wins.
Do the racers have win poses? I didn't see any in the videos.
Everyone except Danica since she never wins.
After playing for about 6 hours solid I can say that this game is good but the original was much better, the really low resolution hurts my eyes and they really turboed it up maybe a little too much. Also sucks that all the weapons are unrelated generic items and not from segas huge vault of concepts and designs. Also deria or whoever should not be in this rouster.
Oh you mean LIKE THISOne thing I will say about the graphics, the models for characters could be a LOT better. Most of them seem like creepy barbies in sega clothes when they're posing.
At least Danica and Ralph could equal exposure sales. Some of those dlc characters are just garbage. Just because SEGA wants to focus on their most profitable IPs doesn't mean we want them shitting up the one last fan-service game we're probably going to get.
Oh you mean LIKE THIS
Whats with er arm?
When you go to sega website to vote make sure one of them is for Sakura Shinguji or Blaze Fielding. Ryo is already winning so no point in voting for an almost shoe in character anyway.
When you go to sega website to vote make sure one of them is for Sakura Shinguji or Blaze Fielding. Ryo is already winning so no point in voting for an almost shoe in character anyway.
Not much Panzer love there so far. I'd buzz me off getting to have one of the riders (any) from the series and their vehicle being a morphing dragon which goes between running, swimming and flying.
IGN gave the PS360 versions an 8.6 and the impressions around here are pretty positive. My guess is that the ONM review is a fluke. We'll see, but between that and SOL stating that it's got slightly better textures and frame rate I severely doubt anybody playing this on Wii U will be let down.
Both of those characters are in the game, although Hatcher is unplayable
Alough the wii u version has no voice chat which might be a big let down to some.
Alough the wii u version has no voice chat which might be a big let down to some.
Alough the wii u version has no voice chat which might be a big let down to some.
Been forever since I've been to the Sega Forums. Had a lot of characters that I wanted to go with, but I eventually decided on:
1. Ristar
2. Vectorman
3. Selvaria Bles - Valkyria Chronicles
Pretty cool that Fang the Sniper won the Sonic poll. Nice to see Blaze do good as well. But Silver up that high? Ugh.
I'd give it a 62% based on the terrible character roster. Do we really need six Sonic characters? Or, hell, if space is so limited, anything other than one character per franchise?
You have to do all of grand prix to unlock themI've been blazing through World Tour mode, and just unlocked. Been playing for ~8 hours, according to my in-game license. Man, this game is fun. Hard difficulty is very satisfying.AGES
Oddly enough, I'm still missing two characters--Eggman and Avatar, I think.
ONM gave a 6.2 to this title, Wii U version.
http://www.officialnintendomagazine.co.uk/43897/best-wii-u-games/?page=1
What we said: The early excitement of the transformations doesn't make up for an interminable world tournament, poor local multiplayer and uninspiring weapons. The mixture of Sega and Sumo (with a hint of Bizarre) should have made for a game that was as accomplished as it was nostalgic. Instead, it just feels pallid.
Score: 62%
To me, sounds like one of those "official nintendo snob" review (if it would have been MK, it would have been better!") and everythiong I'v seen so far about the game, pleased me. So, Wii u version is the only one I'm interested it: if someone will try it out, or read another review, please let me know.
Thank you.
Wait, what? 5 player Splitscreen, battle mode and Monkey Ball mode are/play bad?
Wait, what? 5 player Splitscreen, battle mode and Monkey Ball mode are/play bad?
if they play bad, sure. options doesn't automatically = good.
ONM gave a 6.2 to this title, Wii U version.
http://www.officialnintendomagazine.co.uk/43897/best-wii-u-games/?page=1
What we said: The early excitement of the transformations doesn't make up for an interminable world tournament, poor local multiplayer and uninspiring weapons. The mixture of Sega and Sumo (with a hint of Bizarre) should have made for a game that was as accomplished as it was nostalgic. Instead, it just feels pallid.
Score: 62%
To me, sounds like one of those "official nintendo snob" review (if it would have been MK, it would have been better!") and everythiong I'v seen so far about the game, pleased me. So, Wii u version is the only one I'm interested it: if someone will try it out, or read another review, please let me know.
Thank you.
I seriously think Nintendo should sue, what SEGA and Sumo did here is just wrong.
Also any 'official' magazine for any of the big three companies tends to be fairly awful when it comes to non-PR material so I'm not surprised ONM in this case just gave a vague as all hell 'its poor' comment and left it at that. Would've only raised an alarm if they cited something like a crappy frame rate or other technical issues.
I seriously think Nintendo should sue, what SEGA and Sumo did here is just wrong.
Could you kindly explain why Nintendo should sue?
Because Nintendo invented the concept of wacky racers, along with nearly every other genre in existence.
I assumed this quote was more well-known than it really was I guess :X
if they play bad, sure. options doesn't automatically = good.
Because Nintendo invented the concept of wacky racers, along with nearly every other genre in existence.
I assumed this quote was more well-known than it really was I guess :X
there is a demo on xbox live in europe (1 gb). sorry if its old news.
Not that I endorse their reviews, never forget that 91% Red Steel and whatever high score they gave My Sims, now they certainly whiffed a bit.
Didn't Red Steel come out in 2006? I think it is time to forget it honestly.