All I am going on is journalists telling them that the game needed more time a few months ago.The game was in development and Sonic Team head Iizuka said the team was confident in the game back in June. Do we have any indication that the game was rushed instead of this just being what they had always intended?
This game is actually really good so far. Everything about it feels really good. Doesn't have that awkward feeling I hate to admit Sonic games have for me. Atmosphere is great. Soundstrack is incredible.
The PC version doesn't support ultrawide but a quick hexedit got it to almost 100%. I'm running it at 5760x2400 (DSR from 3840x1600) ultrawide with 8x Supersampled AA forced via Nvidia Control Panel. Motion blur disabled. Really cleaned up the image quality. 9900k/RTX 4090
About as bad as all the other 3D Sonic games?That 1/5 review looks like another attention seeking idiot. It's really hard to imagine how bad game should be to deserve such score.
No, 70s is low and 60s is shit. That's how it's worked for like fifteen years. It doesn't make sense, but that's that.Im genuinely baffled how a 70+ score is poor. Thats pretty firmly in the "good" territory.
I think a lot of people are having fun with the actual game but game is technically a mess and needs 6 more months of patches and fixes.
Well the critics would be closer to an 80% if it weren't for the few really low scores dragging it down.173 reviews on Steam and 91% positive... does it mean that "critics" are wrong again?
(443 now) It's the true believers & Community Award fishermen writing reviews now. Give it a few weeks.173 reviews on Steam and 91% positive... does it mean that "critics" are wrong again?
Are you encountering any stutter on your playthrough?This game is actually really good so far. Everything about it feels really good. Doesn't have that awkward feeling I hate to admit Sonic games have for me. Atmosphere is great. Soundstrack is incredible.
The PC version doesn't support ultrawide but a quick hexedit got it to almost 100%. I'm running it at 5760x2400 (DSR from 3840x1600) ultrawide with 8x Supersampled AA forced via Nvidia Control Panel. Motion blur disabled. Really cleaned up the image quality. 9900k/RTX 4090
Probably just means that selection bias continues to exist.173 reviews on Steam and 91% positive... does it mean that "critics" are wrong again?
They used a similar template for Colors and Generations.Why do the reviews keep saying this a cool foundation to build upon when sonic team throws everything out with the each game and starts some new haphazardly thought out concept with each new game. What's his name was already talking about Sonic Adventure 3
It bears repeating: any game from Nintendo, Sony, ND, Rockstar, Bethesda, FromSoft, you name it - getting a sub-80 would be called an unmitigated disaster. It’s curious how we should praise Sonic for scraping a 70+, and how reviewers mysteriously warmed up to this game and turned a blind eye on flaws they would roast any AAA release for.It’s amazing how spoiled gamers have become with these nonsensical 9s and 10s for games that clearly are not perfect…then believe that a game in the 70s is bad. Newsflash, a 70+ rating is not bad.
Disclaimer - I will not be getting this game as I’m not a Sonic fan, but just knew people would be bashing it in the 70s
Because people are too obsess with "scores" these days but reality is games getting super high score is no guarantee you gonna enjoy the game and vice versa.It’s amazing how spoiled gamers have become with these nonsensical 9s and 10s for games that clearly are not perfect…then believe that a game in the 70s is bad. Newsflash, a 70+ rating is not bad.
Disclaimer - I will not be getting this game as I’m not a Sonic fan, but just knew people would be bashing it in the 70s
I couldn’t have said it better myself. Some of my favorite games have been high 60 low 70. It just bums me out that so many people base their purchasing decisions on a score put forth by someone who most likely has a different opinion than themselves.Because people are too obsess with "scores" these days but reality is games getting super high score is no guarantee you gonna enjoy the game and vice versa.
I enjoyed games like NieR Gestalt despite getting low scores, while I didnt enjoyed Horizon AT ALL despite it got such high scores.
Great points, and really solidifies what I mean as well, although you definitely said it better lol. I believe it goes both ways. Realistically, the best way to know the true score of a game is to play it and be the judge yourself.It bears repeating: any game from Nintendo, Sony, ND, Rockstar, Bethesda, FromSoft, you name it - getting a sub-80 would be called an unmitigated disaster. It’s curious how we should praise Sonic for scraping a 70+, and how reviewers mysteriously warmed up to this game and turned a blind eye on flaws they would roast any AAA release for.
If this were a Mario game we’d be hearing the usual litany of “this’d be good if it didn’t have the Mario name on it”. But it‘s Sonic and people are not saying that, so… maybe it’s just par for the course for Sonic, ie a middling game falling short of the inexplicable hype some people had for it before release.
In my opinion those people dont trust their own taste. I trust my own taste in games more than any reviews and for most part it hasn't failed me.I couldn’t have said it better myself. Some of my favorite games have been high 60 low 70. It just bums me out that so many people base their purchasing decisions on a score put forth by someone who most likely has a different opinion than themselves.
This. Sonic Team has had attempt after attempt to get a formula, and they've shat themselves repeatedly. They finally come out with something that many reviewers are calling a "foundation" or "template" for things to come. Not good enough.If any, these 8/10 reviews prove that hardcore Sonic fans would be okay with actually getting fucked in the ass with a hedgehog if it meant getting a new Sonic game.
"Buuuuut the potential, buuuuut the concept".
Motherfucker, this is a 60 dollar game. Have some standards, for fuck's sake.
I will enthusiatically be awaiting your bitcoin transfer of $60 so I can afford to do this for every game people say this about.Realistically, the best way to know the true score of a game is to play it and be the judge yourself.
Ive been playing the game for a few hours now and I think its pretty good. Most of the complaints are sort of nonsensical if anything to me. People are complaining about all the "random ass floating platforms and shit" but since when do platformers not rely on this trope? Mario games have been doing this forever (Mario Sunshine might be the only exception I can even think of with this trope and even then it had its fair share of it), A Hat in Time (fantastic game btw) did this a lot too, its really not an unusual trope.If any, these 8/10 reviews prove that hardcore Sonic fans would be okay with actually getting fucked in the ass with a hedgehog if it meant getting a new Sonic game.
"Buuuuut the potential, buuuuut the concept".
Motherfucker, this is a 60 dollar game. Have some standards, for fuck's sake.
My PS5 impressions so far:
+ Open world feels like a giant Tony Hawk map, love finding new rails and trampolines and chaining them together in combos.
+ Combat is surprisingly fun, I really like the Sonic Boom attack using the L2 button, dual sense makes it feel even better.
+ Looks and runs great at 60fps (aside from the pop-in)
+ Digging the music and the overall atmospheric vibe, so chill
- Already lost interest in the story
- Not sure what I'm supposed to be doing most of the time, the map is just a bunch of icons so I'm just setting markers and seeing what happens.
- omg, the pop-in is so bad
- Not a fan of the cyberspace levels, just did one level and have been playing in the open world island the rest of the time.
Overall, still happy with my purchase, I still recommend it.
7/10 (so far)