what the fuck is it with the British and defending Sonic the hedgehog so much
Seriously, when I was living in the UK last year on two separate occasions I inexplicably got given a long winding speech from people I didn't even know at parties about how Sonic has always been great and gamers are just spoiled or some shit. Just smile, nod, walk away, but the way they managed to go on for 10 minutes and not even bring up specific examples for why the series isn't shit seems telling they don't even play it much nowadays themselves.
Both occurrances I didn't say anything more than that I liked platformers while people played something in the background.
Sega was kind of the only game console manufacturer in the UK in the 90's. Either you owned a Mega Drive, or you had computers like the Amiga and the Commodore. Nintendo was notorious in their neglect for the UK market, with games releasing there months or even years after North America and Japan. It wasn't until sometime around the Gamecube that Nintendo finally went, "Hey, sorry, Europe. We'll start treating you as equals now."
But Sega of Europe was still doing their Sonic media blitz, so they had comics and toys and whatnot all of their own. Sonic became this huge force over there, and he was basically unopposed, unless you count characters like
Dizzy as being "competition". (I don't, but I'm an American, so what do I know)
Kinda have a question as I'm planning to dive into Issues #237 and #238 tomorrow. Just read this and considering that Geoffrey St. John seems to have an interesting role in both StH and SU at the moment,
I wonder what this means? (Even though the bottom cover looks better.) Probably nothing? I thought Flynn said the case has little bearing on the comic flow at the moment.
I don't get it. A lot of the stuff that Penders worked on like the Knuckles stuff is done and over with, right? Is he just blowing a lot of hot air now or what?
It's sounding like Penders might actually have a case. My understanding of it is Penders alleges that Archie did not have him sign the appropriate work-for-hire contracts, so he still owns his own characters. Penders is calling in other Archie writers and even the former EIC (as in, the one who would have had him sign that contract) to verify this.
Both Archie and Penders filed for something called "summary judgement", where they basically write up their preliminary evidence, present it to the judge, and if he grants summary judgement, they skip a full blown legal trial altogether and a winner is declared right there. The judge denied summary judgement, and advised them to find a settlement out of court. If Archie doesn't settle, it will eventually go to trial. Based on the removal of St. John, it would seem that Archie might be running scared.