and? i expect them to make more games than MS and Nintendo for last gen. They had more studios than them. My issue with ports whether they be from ps3 to ps4 or pc is that they are simply just old games being moved to another platform and not a new game. So they barely count when you have Microsoft's bc and their love of putting games on pc and xbox one day one. For vr , I'm just not interested in it since I don't have one. I will say that they if they really want to push vr then they should be making much larger games to hype and push the device and buying or building some studios to actually support the platform
Due to crazy Ken stuff proper PS3 BC or emulation wasn't possible in PS4 and even in todays high-end PCs. So they had to remaster the main games for the new players. Consideing it also meant a big change for engines and so on, they did use these remasters to adapt their engines for the next gen, something that also helped to reduce the cost of the first brand new sequel of the games because the cost of these engine and tools adaptation was made for the remaster and not for the new game.
Console sales are simply the bonus now and gamepass is the true enemy that Sony needs to deal with. You see this in Microsoft's push to put xbox games on pc and push game pass on pc as well as console. So what if Sony sales 130 million consoles if Microsoft has 60 million or more gamepass subscribers every month from pc and consoles.
-27% of the PS revenue is from consoles sold
-55% of the PS revenue is from (mostly 3rd party) console game sales (which depend on consoles sold)
-11% from online subscriptions (which mostly depend on consoles sold)
-7% from accesories (which depend on consoles sold)
The revenue from consoles sold alone is a big chunk of the money they make, but most of their revenue sources (I think mobile games and PC PSNow are the only exceptions) depend on consoles sold.
Regarding the case of Sony with 130 million consoles, it's more or less the case now with PS4+PS5 sales: they make way more revenue and profit than MS game division with the current. GP reaching 60M would mean that maybe they would slightly pass the current amount of subscribers Sony has (Plus+Now), which is around 50M. But in MS case would be with many people having paid only $1 instead of full subscription and sacrificing a lot of game sales plus tons of millions paid to devs to compensate for putting their games on GP, and sacrificing game sales, plus sacrificing console sales because their games being day one on PC too.
The overrall picture of 130M Sony consoles vs 60M GP subscribers would mean that very likely MS game division would make less revenue and profits than Sony currently does. And Sony's game division sales and revenue has a long term growth that won't stop now:
So once GP hits 60M subscribers they may be close to the current Sony numbers, but Sony numbers will be way higher once GP hits 60M if they achive them, that I think will be the case. But I also think that once they achieve 60M GP subs, the combination of Gold+GP subs will continue to be smaller than Plus+Now subs because they will also grow.
Sony isn't worried about GP, and won't be worried once it hits 60M subs. The overall PS strategy performs way better and seems will continue doing so. They will only continue tweaking Now and Plus as already planned (like putting PS Now on mobile/tablets/tvs, increasing its resolution and image quality, expanding to more countries, tweaking the business model and catalog, etc) because they have areas of improvement specially considering next gen logical steps, but won't be putting there all their exclusives + some multi AAA games day one.
For the horizon of gamepass it is all a matter of how far they plan on pursuing this netflix type subscription and how much they are willing to lose. We've already seen that they are willing to spend 7 billion on it and they know they won't be getting that money back any time soon. All of those gaas , dlc portions, and microtransactions nonsense were already getting already without game pass so why wouldn't they add it to game pass games as well.
Remember they also made more recent acquisitions like Minecraft and so on. In the recent years they spend over 10B on acquisitions. On top of that they also pay the publishers the estimated amount of money they won't earn in sales due to including these games on GP. It's a lot of money invested until now. Not sure how far they will go, but I think they will continue with it at least 3-4 years more. Maybe in 2023-2024 once all their new studios released their first next gen only exclusive plus their old catalog games on GP and it reached 50M subscribers then they will stop including some of the best selling games day one on Gamepass, or stop the $1 stuff, rise the subscription price, stop the acquisitions, etc. in order to try to make it profitable and start recouping all the investment.
Sony has already grown their top teams significantly, and they are all producing additional games that will start releasing in the next few years: Insomniac has 3-4 teams, ND is working on 3 games now, SSM is working on at least 2 games, GG is working on at least 2 games. There is a new studio in SD.
So in terms of first-party output, they have already made the necessary decisions. There may come further acquisitions down the road, which may bolster the output even more, as hinted in the financial reports.
Yep, in recent interviews Ryan said they will continue growing their teams and that plan to do some acquisitions.