ArjanN said:There are actually people who don't get the censorship thing was a joke? I mean, really?
They tried to get the censorship work as a joke, but I think they care too much about free speech to make this up.ArjanN said:There are actually people who don't get the censorship thing was a joke? I mean, really?
As Cartman said, people wanted to know who his father was. :lolDechaios said:Personally I loved the first part but the second part was kind of meh to me. Felt lacking because of all the bleeps, and it feels like the father thing was on the forefront and they just let the celeb part of the storyline get stale and die out.
Dacvak said:None of it was forced, all of it was planned.
Edit: I seriously can't believe how many people think that the censoring was forced. Are you people fucking serious? I could see if MAYBE you thought the censoring was forced for the first half of the episode, but once they got to the "what I learned today" where EVERYTHING was censored, then you knew for SURE that it was part of the joke. Because it was obvious that the "what I learned today" part was censored on purpose, and the only reason why that was funny was because there was so much censoring going on in the first place.
If you REALLY still think the censoring was forced, then wait until they rerun last week's episode and see if they have to censor it this time.
Shit, you people are stupid. =P
DeathNote said:I keep reading 15th season to 2011.
But, they didn't correct the 2013 date in an interview.
http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2...ologize-to-no-one/?scp=1&sq=south park&st=cse
Trey Parker is 40, Matt Stone is 38, don't know if that's a hint or not.
SlipperySlope said:The way they stopped Bababada was just stupid.
ArjanN said:There are actually people who don't get the censorship thing was a joke? I mean, really?
I was really hoping for this too, but they probably thought that doing such a thing would shake up the show too much.Host Samurai said:I was really hoping for Cartmans dad to be Kyles dad so that he would be 1/2 Jew. That would have been epic.
If it's a joke, then why is there still not a streaming version of the episode and instead you're greeted with a message talking about how CC added too many "bleeps" to the original episode before it was even broadcast?ArjanN said:There are actually people who don't get the censorship thing was a joke? I mean, really?
Yeah, why would 'mohammed' being censored be a joke? They didn't censor that in episode 200. CC is pretty anal about this (censoring all mohammed depictions), they probably got even more anal after the threats.besada said:http://i40.tinypic.com/33fc2z7.jpg
Looks like not all of it was a joke.
Clown_im_OP said:I'm 99% sure that the bleeping of the word Mohammed was intentional too, considering how ridiculously often they mentioned the name. They're just making fun of that whole stupid thing instead of being like "fuck that, we're just showing it", which is very smart and executed well, I think. And surely even that message on SPS is part of it.
yeah i think there's more to is than 'lol joke!'squicken said:So not airing the repeat at 11 (and charging a higher price for ads) and not streaming it on the website are part of the joke? GAF's little theory seems awfully expensive.
Probably both.MIMIC said:Elaborate parody or self-censorship (network pressure).
Okay, I didn't know about the thing with the repeat, seems nonsensical. But the only thing I could think about that might be forced censoring by CC is the bleeping of Mohammeds name, and as I said, I think they mentioned it strangely often, especially in the beginning. So either they intended to say the name (uncensored) that much on purpose, or they bleeped it themselves. That bleeping of the "I learned something"-scene just cannot be forced, it's too obvious.squicken said:So not airing the repeat at 11 (and charging a higher price for ads) and not streaming it on the website are part of the joke? GAF's little theory seems awfully expensive.
When you deal with bullies that hunt you down and kill you?AVclub said:This issue of not showing a likeness of Mohammed is really idiotic. When are people going to grow some balls and stop letting bullies tell them what to do? Besides, isn't there a likeness of the prophet Mohammed in a US government building?
that's sadDram said:http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/04/22/south-park-episode-is-altered-after-muslim-groups-warning/?src=mv
On Thursday morning, a spokesman for Comedy Central confirmed that the network had added more bleeps to the episode than were in the cut delivered by South Park Studios, and that it was not giving permission for the episode to run on the studios Web site.
phalestine said:Well 201 is now streaming. At work right now so cant tell if its any different than the tv version.
A Comedy Central spokesperson confirmed it was the network's decision to bleep the words.
I thought the US government took away all our privacy with the Patriot Act specifically to protect us from these terrorists. Aren't we perfectly safe now that we've given away much of our civil liberties?Sanjuro Tsubaki said:When you deal with bullies that hunt you down and kill you?
Unless the Patriot Act has the ability to read minds then I would say it does very little good when it comes to this. They all aren't terrorists either.AVclub said:I thought the US government took away all our privacy with the Patriot Act specifically to protect us from these terrorists. Aren't we perfectly safe now that we've given away much of our civil liberties?