I think that finding someone who wants to be Bork 2.0 might prove difficult, especially when Trump hasn't bothered to actual nominate people.You think Trump wouldn't do that?
I think that finding someone who wants to be Bork 2.0 might prove difficult, especially when Trump hasn't bothered to actual nominate people.You think Trump wouldn't do that?
Yup, he's been pushing this since day one. We keep trying to tell him otherwise.
Amazing.
My FAVORITE outcome would be that Flynn/Pence/etc were knowingly colluding and charged for it.
BUT Donny was too stupid to know it was happening/was actually innocent but still gets pooned for obstructing justice/money laundering etc.
Uh, this is the first time I've even talked about Rosenstein. Might have me confused with someone else.
I don't trust Rosenstein. I'm amazed that that makes me an Alex Jones tier conspiracy theorist.
This week has been a fucking rollercoaster.
Yup, he's been pushing this since day one. We keep trying to tell him otherwise.
Uh, this is the first time I've even talked about Rosenstein. Might have me confused with someone else.
I don't trust Rosenstein. I'm amazed that that makes me an Alex Jones tier conspiracy theorist.
Uh, this is the first time I've even talked about Rosenstein. Might have me confused with someone else.
I don't trust Rosenstein. I'm amazed that that makes me an Alex Jones tier conspiracy theorist.
Investigators have also been looking for any evidence of possible financial crimes among Trump associates, officials said.
This is going to be real bad for some people.
Indeed. If this sticks, a lot of people could be going away or they might make a plea deal and just send more people up the river to save their own skin, which will be exactly what's going to end up happening.
weren't under investigation till you fired the guy who told you that you weren't under investigation
Comey was in peak form during that testimony.
He's done what everyone wanted. Hiring who many consider to be top tier.
You don't have to trust him, but doubting him is ignoring how significant that move was In favor of cynicism.
Yeah Rosenstein's career as an independent attorney will be over if he under pressure from Trump fires his own handpicked special counsel. Rosenstein has an agenda but I dont think he will lie down for Trump.I think Rosenstein is a slimy opportunist. Mueller is his way to leave this admin clean. Firing Mueller at Trump's will shits away the entire point of hiring him in the first place. It's batshit.
What does hiring Mueller and then firing him do for Resenstein? You're going just a tad bit beyond healthy skepticism.
[The Washington] Post says Dan Coats, the director of national intelligence, the NSAs Mike Rogers and Rogers former deputy, Richard Ledgett, agreed to be interviewed as early as this week. (Bloomberg)
Trump legal team pushes back at report Special Counsel Mueller looking at evidence of possible obstruction against @realDonaldTrump
https://twitter.com/KellyO/status/875120848436432896
It is one, but it's also one he has to make, because he can't make that type of blanket assurance. He's still a lawyer, not a politician.I agree, but when he says things like "I wouldn't fire Mueller without good reason", it sounds like a qualification. If he just said "I wouldn't fire Mueller" I'd feel better.
Trump legal team pushes back at report Special Counsel Mueller looking at evidence of possible obstruction against @realDonaldTrump
https://twitter.com/KellyO/status/875120848436432896
I agree, but when he says things like "I wouldn't fire Mueller without good reason", it sounds like a qualification. .
I agree, but when he says things like "I wouldn't fire Mueller without good reason", it sounds like a qualification. If he just said "I wouldn't fire Mueller" I'd feel better.
No, his answer is correct. Clinton fired FBI director too, but thats because the FBI director was illegally using taxpayer funds for his own leisure. If Mueller is doing similar I dont have a problem if Rosenstein fires him.I agree, but when he says things like "I wouldn't fire Mueller without good reason", it sounds like a qualification. If he just said "I wouldn't fire Mueller" I'd feel better.
I agree, but when he says things like "I wouldn't fire Mueller without good reason", it sounds like a qualification. If he just said "I wouldn't fire Mueller" I'd feel better.
Trump legal team pushes back at report Special Counsel Mueller looking at evidence of possible obstruction against @realDonaldTrump
https://twitter.com/KellyO/status/875120848436432896
They will continue with the cult of personality spiel and say this is all fake news.
how would this be illegal?
[The Washington] Post says Dan Coats, the director of national intelligence, the NSAs Mike Rogers and Rogers former deputy, Richard Ledgett, agreed to be interviewed as early as this week. (Bloomberg)