SenjutsuSage
Banned
$449.99 the absolute lowest, and $569.99 the absolute highest.
Scorpio won't, apparently, have exclusive games. So Xbox One games are going to need to be developed with the OG Xbox One in mind. There's a limit to how wildly different and more powerful they can make it. By all accounts PS4 Pro is quite easy to make patches for (even if some devs have fucked it up *cough* Bethesda *cough*). That will not be the case with Scorpio if it's using an entirely different, Zen based, SoC.
Still feels like weird to me. What's the point in making it so much more powerful than the Xbox One but saying it won't have exclusives - alot of that power might end up getting wasted on things which aren't MS exclusives.
I'm laughing at people who think a $599 price tag won't kill the product on arrival.
Do people not remember the $499 XB1 tag? Remember how quick they ripped out the kinect to get that price down? People don't want $500 consoles let alone $600. And what if PS5 gets announced at E3 for for early 2018 months after the Scorpio for $100-150 less?
That's a false equivalence though. The 360 came along at the birth of HD, and clearly wasn't powerful enough to comfortably hit those targets.
Scorpio hardware is well above 'Full HD' capability and most games will hit 4K/30fps comfortably. In most cases it would be trivial or even automatic that the game could run at double the framerate at 25% resolution. If it also has a better CPU, then even more so.
The narrative ever since these premium consoles were announced is that people would largely prefer 1080p/60fps instead of 4K. The PS4 Pro is a bit on the weak side to comfortably offer both but the Scorpio hardware is in a much stronger position to do so. I think it would be foolish to not give the vocal core gamers what they want, particularly when they are the primary audience for this type of machine.
'Every game playable at 60fps on Scorpio' is a great marketing bullet point too.
Would we consider the Xbox One Original Launch at $499 a "premium price" for a "premium product."
I think that is the price you should start at when determining the launch price of Scorpio.
This is what I can't see MS pulling out.
This has $600 written all over it.
People didn't want a $500 console with lower performance than a $400 console.
We do remember it. It's not comparable.I'm laughing at people who think a $599 price tag won't kill the product on arrival.
Do people not remember the $499 XB1 tag? Remember how quick they ripped out the kinect to get that price down? People don't want $500 consoles let alone $600. And what if PS5 gets announced at E3 for for early 2018 months after the Scorpio for $100-150 less?
The key word is custom APUs which according to AMD are not happening till 2018. The non-custom solutions being released will not fit console power envelope and are unlikely to be utilized by MS.Zen based APUs will already be launching in mid 2017. The first will be Raven Ridge w/ 4 core / 8 threads and lower-end Vega GPU. with PS4+ graphics.
A long while ago, AMD showed plans for a monster Zen 16 core / 32 thread APU with high-end Greenland (Vega 10) GPU with HBM2. If it becomes a product, it could arrive in 2018.
Certainly AMD . Microsoft could have a reasonably lower clocked 8 core/ 16 thread Zen APU with a Vega 11 GPU (some CUs disabled, 800 MHz, 6 TF, high yields) with conventional GDDR5 memory for Scorpio in late 2017 without breaking a sweat.
I think you will be very, very wrong. I think Crackdown 3 will end up being a Scorpio system seller. I won't be surprised if there is not an XB1 version of the game.
In the end, I still suspect this is a new gen, but just marketed more like a new iPad. Some games will only be good on the new console, but everything you have will play just find on it, and all social features will roll right over, from friends lists and clubs, to online games against XB1, and even 360, users.
When the PS5 comes out, Microsoft will be able to easily run out a new Scorpio to match, or slightly exceed the PS5 specs. Again, everything you own will play just fine on it, and it will be more like the PS4 Pro to the PS4 than a new gen again.
But this gen placed MS way behind. They want a new one, but they want to keep their third party developers happy. They have to hope that this is what Sega missed when they bumped up to the Dreamcast before their partners were ready.
I think this is how it will play out. I have no idea if it will actually sell more console for Microsoft, or even if it will increase their MAU.
lol At people thinking this will cost the same price as the PS4 Pro.
We do remember it. It's not comparable.
Xbox One was lambasted at $500 because it launched with a peripheral that hardly any main gamer wanted and was WEAKER than the PS4 which was $100 cheaper.
It's not the people didn't want a $500 console...they just didn't want a weaker console with a mandatory device they would not use.
If Scorpio is $450-500 then you are paying an extra $100 for a seemingly more powerful console which makes your example poor.
Risky but could work out for them since I know 3+ people in this very thread that will easily pay $650+ for this thing at launch, regardless of CPU specs.MS should launch at a high price and profit from the early adopters who will pay any price. They've shown they're willing to drop price drastically very quickly and get the rest of the people on board not long after launch.
lol At people thinking this will cost the same price as the PS4 Pro.
Ya I agree. I'm personally thinking $400 or $450. All I'm saying is anyone saying people don't want $500 and use XB1 as an example are missing the point. The console failed because it was weaker than it's competition and had a worthless peripheral at $500, not because of the price itself.399 without a game probably makes sense a year from now. As the tech will be older and they probably want to regain some market share.
It's out a year from now.lol At people thinking this will cost the same price as the PS4 Pro.
Yea $399 with lowest HDD and no 4K UHD is if they are already eating costs on top, so they are getting desperate.There is absolutely no way they drop the UHD now that Sony doesn't have one. They would rather eat the cost and include it than to remove.
I think 500GB at $399 with no games (or an old 1st part game like Gears 4). By then the S will probably be $199 with a game or two. $200 is big enough price gap to call it "premium" and big enough to not kill the S sales between E3 (or whenever they announce price) and release.
Edit: I see them doing similar to the S aswell, 2TB first with huge profit margins, etc, with the 500GB about a month later.
Yea $399 with lowest HDD and no 4K UHD is if they are already eating costs on top, so they are getting desperate.
My point overall is there's no way they won't have a $399 SKU.
Seriously. There is nothing lol-worthy about $400 price in late 2017.It's out a year from now.
So their main player base *snip* will be effectively eliminated in one fell swoop.
So their main player base of obnoxious teens and pre teens yelling sexual and racial abuse will be effectively eliminated in one fell swoop.
![]()
You can't buy them new. I bought a used one from Amazon to replace my Day One. They can be had, but none of the retailers have them anymore. The ones that have new ones were charging a premium, too.
For me, it was worth checking out the SSD hybrid drive. I already had an Elite controller, so I sold the controller it came with for $80 to get the price down even more. I paid $300 for it. It was like new, as the box was damaged, but the console and everything worse were brand new and undamaged.
$399 or it's DOA
Besides the fact that the price of the components will be cheaper a year from now, I also think people are getting too hung up on the word "premium". If at this point next year the base model Xbox One S has a permanent price of $250 (instead of 300 now), and the base model Scorpio comes in at $400, then that makes Scorpio a pretty premium product for their Xbox line. This idea that whenever Spencer says it will be a premium product means that it will be $500-600 is not really a good way of thinking taking it what I just saidSeriously. There is nothing lol-worthy about $400 price in late 2017.
I think we're all hoping for $399, but to say DOA is a bit of a stretch without knowing what they're putting inside. What if it has 12GB of GDDR5X and an upraded CPU in addition to the GPU upgrade? You get what you pay for and I would definitely be ok with paying for what I get.
I think that question is a bit more relevant in this case VS the PS4 Pro because you can play all upcoming XB1 exclusives on PC. I'm not trying to offend anyone...
Would we consider the Xbox One Original Launch at $499 a "premium price" for a "premium product."
I think that is the price you should start at when determining the launch price of Scorpio.
449 is my guess.
I can't see it at 500. Sony learned that is a sticker shocking price.
Definitely premium price for a premium product that totally backfired on Microsoft. It's not like Microsoft is incapable or not allowed to learn from their mistakes. If the console is $400, I'll buy it. If it's $450 I'll consider it. If it's $500+, I'll wait. I think a lot of people might be in a similar boat.
I think you will be very, very wrong. I think Crackdown 3 will end up being a Scorpio system seller. I won't be surprised if there is not an XB1 version of the game.
I paid that in Canada dollars for my Pro...
This guy gets it.MS should launch at a high price and profit from the early adopters who will pay any price. They've shown they're willing to drop price drastically very quickly and get the rest of the people on board not long after launch.
So this console is definitely going to be called the Xbox One Elite right?