I'm imaging all these lines being said by the new Doctor Doom.
I really don't get the Spider-Man 1&2 hate they were awesome
Revisionist history trying to take them down to make new ones look better.I really don't get the Spider-Man 1&2 hate they were awesome
Not hate, per se. But Spidey 1 is definitely a sign of the times and aged poorly.
Spidey 2 is nearly perfect though. Alfred Molina was great.
Not hate, per se. But Spidey 1 is definitely a sign of the times and aged poorly.
Spidey 2 is nearly perfect though. Alfred Molina was great.
I don't understand the love for spiderman 2. I though all three of the McGuire movies were shite
Spider-Man 2 was the greatest comic book movie ever made at the time it came out. It's since been outdone but it proved how amazing those stories could be.
I'm sorry if you have bad taste
The Disney has been trying for years to get the rights to Spider-Man apparently, offering billions (meaning that they consider his acquisition on the same level as the Star Wars franchise). Sony refused though, and still no money has changed hands between the two studios.
Apparently, it's "instead seen as a quid pro quo transaction" which will see both Marvel and Sony feel the benefits. The former (who still control the merchandising rights to the character) are said to be very pleased as the effect on sales this deal will have should be bigger than any financial sort of offering Sony could have come up with. One insider claims that: "Sony would never have made this deal if they still retained the merchandising rights. Even a poor performing movie could be saved by strong merchandise sales, and Spider-Man is one of the bigger brands out there."
Despite the fact that Marvel are effectively taking over the franchise, Sony and Pascal will still have influence over who ends up playing the character, and the hunt is now on for "an actor much younger than 31-year-old Andrew Garfield." They're also looking for a writer, so maybe Drew Goddard has been dumped along with Marc Webb (who has now also been confirmed as not making a return) and everyone else who was attached to the upcoming movies. Matt Tolmach and Satan Avi Arad have been downgraded to executive producers from producers, a meaningless title which will see tham have "no real say in the creative direction of the franchise".
Meanwhile, one of the most interesting tidbits is the fact that, "One knowledgeable source sees the move as a first step to Marvel re-acquiring the rights to Spider-Man down the road, while another believes Disney is positioning itself to acquire Sony should it ever become available."
What's so good about it?
Roger Ebert on S-M2Now this is what a superhero movie should be. "Spider-Man 2" believes in its story in the same way serious comic readers believe, when the adventures on the page express their own dreams and wishes. It's not camp and it's not nostalgia, it's not wall-to-wall special effects and it's not pickled in angst. It's simply and poignantly a realization that being Spider-Man is a burden that Peter Parker is not entirely willing to bear.
There are moviegoers who make a point of missing superhero movies, and I can't blame them, although I confess to a weakness for the genre. I liked both of the "Crow" movies, and "Daredevil," "Hulk" and "X2: X-Men United," but not enough to recommend them to friends who don't like or understand comic books. "Spider-Man 2" is in another category: It's a real movie, full-blooded and smart, with qualities even for those who have no idea who Stan Lee is. It's a superhero movie for people who don't go to superhero movies, and for those who do, it's the one they've been yearning for.
"One knowledgeable source sees the move as a first step to Marvel re-acquiring the rights to Spider-Man down the road, while another believes Disney is positioning itself to acquire Sony should it ever become available."
It's still dripping with that wonderful Raimi cheese though. His trilogy is a 70's comic book, for better AND worse.
I hope they go with miles if only for the meltdown
I was wondering about that too...Wait, Satan Avi Arad
this thread got amazing
Damn 3 spider-man reboots and hasn't even been 20 years.
I can't see Disney acquiring Sony as a whole. Sony Pictures and the entertainment arm of the company, sure. But not the electronics side of things (or insurance, lol).
I feel like we need to reverse this gif. Just for you.
Bonesaw is great.
I can't see Disney acquiring Sony as a whole. Sony Pictures and the entertainment arm of the company, sure. But not the electronics side of things (or insurance, lol).
Damn 3 spider-man reboots and hasn't even been 20 years.
IT'S YOU WHO'S OUT GOBBY
OUT OF YOUR MIND
SLEEEEEEP
INCY WINCY SPIDAAAAH
JOIN ME SPIDER-MAN
Think about it, hero.
BOOONESAW IS READY
RIP. best movies we'll ever get in this genre.
OUT AM I?
FIRST, WE ATTACK HIS HEART!!!
Don't tell HARREEEEEEHH
God-tier.
I could SQUASH YOU LIKE A BUG right now
IMPRESSIVE
THE POWER OF THE SUN
IN THE PALM OF MY HAND
oooOOOOOOHHH
So basically let's take away everything that makes Peters struggles interesting.They should definitely get Jake Gyllenhal to play Parker.
I don't want a young teen Parker again. Let's get an older, engaged/married Parker, who is still as snarky as ever, but more experienced and out of the whole teenage angst thing.
The obsession with having an older, successful male model/genius Peter Larker is so dumb.So basically let's take away everything that makes Peters struggles interesting.
No thanks.
So basically let's take away everything that makes Peters struggles interesting.
No thanks.