• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

[SPOILERS] Star Wars: The Force Awakens (Thread #3) - That's Not How the Force Works

Davey Cakes

Member
I hate to admit it but the anti-PT folks are winning this battle.

I completely get what's GOOD about the PT. It's not all mindless drivel. And I absolutely think the world-building is key to those movies.

But, I'm sorry. I just find The Force Awakens to be a "force" in filmmaking well beyond the movies of the PT. It's a bit too safe but it does a lot more as a compelling piece of entertainment which makes me excited to see the next two movies.

TFA is just higher quality all-around and that's hard to ignore.

All this said, I'm getting a bit tired of the bickering on both sides. It's just distracting from the pure happiness that a new Star Wars movie exists and people are talking about this franchise again like it's a bigger deal than ever before.
 

nullref

Member
If the criticism is "Rey doesn't struggle enough with the force," then the same can be directed at ANH. If anything, Luke struggles less with the force than Rey does.

Of course, I've never heard the criticism that Luke didn't struggle with the Force too much.

No one makes that criticism because it's totally unsupportable. Here's what Luke does with the Force in A New Hope:

  • Blocks a few shots from the training droid
  • Fires the proton torpedo at the Death Star manually, instead of using the targeting computer

In both cases he's mostly just giving himself over to unconscious intuition. And this is under the tutelage of a mentor. In Empire, after some indeterminate amount of time (and presumably practice), he can move his lightsaber with great concentration. Then he's off to Yoda for more training, before he's shown as capable of anything else.
 

I'm no surprised that a lackluster Star Wars movie, that Lucas have no involvement, would give him a more earned respect. Dude is an incredible creative person and his legacy will never be forgotten. His influence with the OT (content-wise) and PT (form-wise) will always remain through time but TFA awoke, in a certain type of person who grew up watching this movies, a sentiment that Star Wars is dead and buried.

The future is a bastardization over an incredible legacy made by Disney.

Hopefully people much more talented than JJ will thrive to create something innovative with this new property.
 

ultracal31

You don't get to bring friends.
You guys seem rather defensive about people criticizing TFA or actually liking stuff about the PT. The New Yorker article seemed to be more about people being able to appreciate Lucas more now that Disney has taken the Star Wars spotlight from him.

I don't think the PT is that good but it's dumb that Disney seems to want to avoid anything pre-OT like the plague. Just because the movies weren't very good doesn't mean someone can't do something interesting with the ideas presented.

though tbh I'm already cynical as fuck knowing that Star Wars is an annual franchise now

I don't mind the criticism over TFA as even I have my own issues with the movie. My issues are with the current articles listed outside of a few legitism points they seem to be written by hipsters who want to go "I'm different eh".

You can also like elements in the PT but saying those elements (the few there are) from 3 otherwise terrible movies somehow eclipse the one TFA movie is just plain silly
 

Alx

Member
Having had some time to digest, while I still like the film, it is a bit like a cover band version of a greatest hits album.

Here's hoping the next one retains the quality while being a bit more ambitious otherwise.

In the end I think the movie did a good job opening a new trilogy. It introduced new characters that were all appreciated, it had enough elements of the original trilogy to prove its faithfulness to the universe, and the fact that the plot was too familiar leaves the fans wanting something different now.
The next director now has his hands free to do whatever he wants with the new material, nobody will blame him for straying from the path.
 

Sephzilla

Member
I just think the entire idea of complaining that TFA shoehorns in OT stuff while championing the prequels for being "original" is stupid considering the prequels go extremely out of their way to shoehorn in OT stuff.
 
I'm no surprised that a lackluster Star Wars movie, that Lucas have no involvement, would give him a more earned respect. Dude is an incredible creative person and his legacy will never be forgotten. His influence with the OT (content-wise) and PT (form-wise) will always remain through time but TFA awoke, in a certain type of person who grew up watching this movies, a sentiment that Star Wars is dead and buried.

The future is a bastardization over an incredible legacy made by Disney.

Hopefully people much more talented than JJ will thrive to create something innovative with this new property.


If anything is a basterdization it's the PT.

There is infinitely more passion on screen in TFA than the entire PT combined acting and character wise

Star Wars is brought to a new generation means Star Wars is dead, ridiculous.
 

JoeInky

Member
I'm no surprised that a lackluster Star Wars movie, that Lucas have no involvement, would give him a more earned respect.


I don't see why that would be the case when he made 3 far worse than lackluster Star Wars movies and the three that are looked upon more kindly certainly can't be 100% attributed to him.
 

Interfectum

Member
I just think the entire idea of complaining that TFA shoehorns in OT stuff while championing the prequels for being "original" is stupid considering the prequels go extremely out of their way to shoehorn in OT stuff.

I think the argument is while the PT shoehorns in a ton of OT callbacks, it doesn't follow the movies (ANH specifically) as beat for beat as TFA does.
 

ultracal31

You don't get to bring friends.
Is the other side of the coin, articles written by sheep's?

Totally :p

Though I was thinking more of judging on its own merits vs clickbaiting "PT were better cause new is different and better"

And this is coming from a guy who thinks TFA is a strong 7-8/10 movie
 

EGM1966

Member
Blah blah this person is not a "master" or whatever that means. It's ridiculous.

While elements of thbie article are clearly pushing agains the current to stand out that claim, on the actual ebvidence of JJ's films, is accurate.

He's a decent director with a nice eye for composition, an ability to get decent performances out of actors for the most part, and a workmanlike approach to narrative.

Nothing he's delviered, including TFA, would have anyone who critically appreciates the medium of film a master. Scorcese is a master, Kubrick was a master... JJ is not.

But that's not a slur. Few people in any medium is a master. 95% of books, films, novels and comics are created by talented craftsmen, people who understand the form and have varying level of talent within it. Only a few can ever be masters such as a Picasso, a Kubrick, a Moore (as in Alan Moore).

JJ was a prefect choice for the reboot as noted as he had the right skills technically and he was always going to be reverential vs out to kill sacred cows and make his Star Wars movie. He made the SW movie he thought fans wanted (including himself) and tried to accomodate the scipt/actors as best he could within this.

The result is a solid but not great film with just the right mix of great scenes to balance the weaker stuff and nice performances for the most part. Most of all it looked, sounded and felt the way fans wanted hence the success.

TBH Star Wars is a textbook case of when an artistic work becomes a Frankenstein monster that gets away from the creator (Lucas). Unlike the monster though its taken by the fans who want what they want.

Not that this is automatically bad, just interesting. That was always the root of the conflict. So far as Lucas was concerned Star Wars was his and if he wanted to recall the painting from the gallery and change it that was his call. If he wanted to test himself creatively and risk mucking about with the magic formula, why that was his call too. However the fanbase, and definition of what Star Wars was, thought differently.

It's always an interesting dilemma with popular material be it a film or a game or whatever.

TFA makes it clear Disney aim to give fans what they want and I presume that's why Lucas ultimately kept his distance. His thinking and Disney's thinking were (are I guess) literally polar opposites.

Now if Lucas was capable of delivering ANH and EBS level films that also took risks and didn't just copy the OT then I'd be all for him still being in charge. Trouble is - speaking as a fan myself - the prequels clearly indicates (as the articles seem to note) that while he had the right ideas he had lost the ability to execute them to the same level as before.

Thus all things being considered I - and probably most - would probably prefer the less interesting and creative approach of Disney (as evidenced by TFA) as it at least promises a damn good Star Wars themed film and familiar heroics and beats vs interesting failures.
 

Liamario

Banned
Saw it for the second time this afternoon. Was able to take things in a lot better. Solo death was more enjoyable, but the score remains unchanged 8/10. Solid Star Wars movie, 3rd best I reckon. Has minor problems that affect it; eg some lines come off too cheesy.
 
Totally :p

Though I was thinking more of judging on its own merits vs clickbaiting "PT were better cause new is different and better"

And this is coming from a guy who thinks TFA is a strong 7-8/10 movie

But there's good and bad content written no matter how one values the movie. At least that's a palpable characterization, instead of "passion" :)
 

Zabka

Member
I think the argument is while the PT shoehorns in a ton of OT callbacks, it doesn't follow the movies (ANH specifically) as beat for beat as TFA does.

TPM is more of a retread of ANH than TFA. Force-sensitive Skywalker found on Tatooine, the kindly Jedi Master who began to teach him about the force is killed by a Sith Lord forcing him to learn from a new master, plus Skywalker hopping in a fighter with R2 and taking down an enemy space station.
 

Sephzilla

Member
TPM is more of a retread of ANH than TFA. Force-sensitive Skywalker found on Tatooine, the kindly Jedi Master who began to teach him about the force is killed by a Sith Lord forcing him to learn from a new master, plus Skywalker hopping in a fighter with R2 and taking down an enemy space station.

Plus both movies have a princess who ends up being respectable in combat and basically field generals at the end when they need to defeat the bigger powerful Empire... I mean Trade Federation. JJ nailed the "its poetry, it rhymes" thing way better than Lucas
 

Vagabundo

Member
I find it interesting that you recognized yourself in my comment.

I'm not shitting on other people's opinions, I'm just expressing my own opinion about a behavioral pattern.

I recognised nothing, Your comment came within a page or two of mine where I express that view.

Rather than try and analysis people motives with pop physiology you could just read why we don't like TFA.

It's a friggen Star Wars film not high cinema. All the films are flawed in one way or another, its just a case of pick your poison. What difference does it make to you if I'd get more of a Star Wars vibe from The Phantom Menace than The Force Awakens?
 

Gintamen

Member
I don't think the PT is that good but it's dumb that Disney seems to want to avoid anything pre-OT like the plague.
Take one look at the comics please, plenty of allusions to the PT can be found. They are even releasing a Obi-Wan and Anakin comic starting this march aside from the ongoing "Kanan - The Last Padawan" series. What an effectless plague.

voVooMY.jpg

Has this ever been posted before?

https://news.vice.com/video/adam-dr...-troops-excerpt-from-arts-in-the-armed-forces

Driver confirmed for based at 1:05
He is such a nice guy, don't know why I kept disliking him till TFA. :/
 
I do hope Ewan Mcgregor Kenobi makes a meaningful appearance at some point during all this. The most spot on part of the PT and since then he has never got jaded or tried to distance himself form it like some people do.

Would love to see Ewan in a good Star Wars movie.


You got plenty of options. Cameo appearance is a anthology movie. His own solo movie. On screen force ghost in the current trilogy. I dunno.



Dude is the one thing from the prequels that made it into TFA so I guess Disney knows it too.
 

inm8num2

Member
Obi-Wan movie will happen. I have to imagine it's next on deck after the Han and Boba movies.

By that point Ewan will be pushing 50 and primed to play a middle-aged Obi-Wan.
 

atr0cious

Member
Seen it a couple times now, will see it some more, especially when my employee pass lets me in.

The new cast is great, and I wish this movie gave them more. As it is, Finn and Rey spend most of the time reacting to the plot pushing them places instead having real time to explore themselves, though Rey's intro was great, especially with almost dialogue until BB8. Oscar Isaac is great and really holds down the beginning, his charisma keeps the beginning from feeling like just another SyFy original flick opening. Kylo is my favorite character in star wars, and I can't wait to see what they do with him. In both of my showings, you could hear the audible gasps as his helmet came off. Adam Driver's ability to disarm with his voice and look really sell in this movie. The mind duel scene with Driver making his faux badass facial ticks and movements trying to be all frightening but really just showing his inability to be so without the mask, really pays off when he finally gets over the hump with Solo.

I feel the main issues in the film all revolve around production. The soundtrack felt like it was used very inappropriately, especially in the Maz Xwing battle. That one spectacular kill in particular that looks so cool in the earlier trailer(@1:35) plays to no impact in the movie. The set design was cool but impractical, the han death scene in particular. In my second showing, I made sure to look at where Kylo is walking to, its literally a cloud of mist and a wall. Literally everyone in the theater knows whats about to happen, that is not good filmmaking. Why not use that poetry and have them meet in a hallway or an empty hangar similar to ANH? It's a complete failure to the scene, the writers and the actors, who now have to do twice as much work to bring any gravity to the scene. Luckily, Adam Driver was more than up to the task. And what the fuck is with that final shot? Was that handheld? Who the fuck thought that was a good idea? It was like they let Lucas in the chair for the camera moves. The only way that shot kind of works is if they use that same shot in VIII, which for narratives sake I hope they don't. I think the one time a modern shot should've been utilized is during the scene when they destroy the republic. Having a single tracking shot from outer space to the surface of the planet would've given more magnitude to the star killer base. As it happens in the film, its almost a disconnect, and we have to have dumb broken expository dialogue explain that yes they are on the surface of the very planet you were just looking at. It just diminishes what should be a what the fuck moment.

I hope Finn isn't a complete bait and switch and we get some equal opportunity saber duels, as I've been a Boyega stan since Attack the Block and I really want to see him at Moses status.

Overall, it's right behind the trilogy for me. The obvious retread in story beats keep it from rising above them, but by no means does that keep it from being a good film in its own right.
 
Only person from the Prequel cast I can't stand is Natalie Portman. Hayden isn't the best actor but I think he's a good Anakin who could have pulled it off with better lines and direction.

Natalie on the other hand is either dry or obnoxious in any scene she's in, and I can't say I care for her in any other movie she's been in.

Anyway, Rey is a Kenobi. Search your feelings.
 

heyf00L

Member
What if Rey is a clone of Luke from his hand (they retrieved the blue saber, why not his hand?)

And what if Ep VII is intentionally recreating the events of Ep IV to make a new Luke (a la MGS2).

Who is behind all this, I don't know, but that's my new crazy theory.
 

watershed

Banned
tumblr_inline_nif9neHaUg1t933mn.gif


McDiarmid wasn't terrible. Ewan definitely wasn't either.

What is the correct response when gif and comment contradict each other? McDiarmid was god awful in that exact scene your gif is taken from. And watching Ewan McGregor talk about Anakin killing younglings is soap opera level bad. The prequels specialized in taking good actors and turning out terrible/bad/flat performances. No one escaped this process, not Liam Neeson, Ewan McGregor, Natalie Portman, Sam Jack, Christopher Lee, no one.
 
What is the correct response when gif and comment contradict each other? McDiarmid was god awful in that exact scene your gif is taken from. And watching Ewan McGregor talk about Anakin killing younglings is soap opera level bad. The prequels specialized in taking good actors and turning out terrible/bad/flat performances. No one escaped this process, not Liam Neeson, Ewan McGregor, Natalie Portman, Sam Jack, Christopher Lee, no one.

I used it because he says "No" in it lol. It's not his best scene but at least McDiarmid's performance is fun and entertaining, which you can't say for many of the others. I'm arguing it wasn't terrible, not that it was incredible.

I thought Liam was decent in TPM too. Definitely one of the brighter parts of the film.
 

MMarston

Was getting caught part of your plan?
What if Rey is a clone of Luke from his hand (they retrieved the blue saber, why not his hand?)

And what if Ep VII is intentionally recreating the events of Ep IV to make a new Luke (a la MGS2).

Who is behind all this, I don't know, but that's my new crazy theory.

Solo Skywalker Simulation


Rey, you must complete your m-m-m-mission
 
Prequel dialog is weak mostly because everyone has a "proper" way of talking. Senators have to sound all diplomatic; Jedi have to sound all cryptic and wise.

And then you look at the OT or NT where nobody really talks "proper" except Obi Wan. Half of Finn's lines especially sound improvised. It makes the interactions feel more genuine.

It represents a difference in how exposition is conveyed. Prequels tell more than show, which is ironic since you can show anything with CG. It's why arguably the weakest scene from TFA was an exposition dump.
 
Top Bottom