Nah the worst is AOTC.
In short, here's everything that supports my Rey is a Skywalker belief.
-- The Force reacts to Rey the moment she touch's the Skywalker family lightsaber.
-- With the exception of being left on Jakku, all of the visions she sees are Skywalker related. She sees images of Luke/Vader on Bespin, Kylo Ren's betrayal of Luke, and in her dreams she sees visions of what we later find out is the first Jedi Temple (where Luke is). The only vision that isn't Skywalker related is her being left on Jakku, but one could assume that's a vision of Luke leaving her there since everything else she sees is Skywalker related.
-- The voices she hears in the vision are Luke, Vader (breathing), Obi-Wan, and Yoda. Two Skywalkers, and the two people who trained the Skywalkers.
-- She's a gifted pilot, just like Anakin and Luke.
-- She's extremely gifted with The Force, even without any kind of training or instruction. The only humans who have been depicted like this in the films are Skywalkers. (The Force runs strong in my family, etc)
-- Luke is on the verge of tears at the end of the movie when seeing Rey, I wonder why.
-- The age difference between Rey and Kylo Ren lines up in a way that Rey could have been young enough to be left on Jakku after Kylo Ren betrayed the New Jedi Academy. Also, if Rey's visions are shown chronologically then Kylo's betrayal happens before Rey is left on Jakku.
Why do some elevate ROTS above the other prequel films?
After rewatching them all in the past 3 weeks my personal ranking isI'll have to rewatch TFA before I give it a definitive ranking but right now it's #3 for me ahead of ROTS at #4.
Why do some elevate ROTS above the other prequel films?
Why do some elevate ROTS above the other prequel films?
After rewatching them all in the past 3 weeks my personal ranking is
Why do some elevate ROTS above the other prequel films?
Why do some elevate ROTS above the other prequel films?
Cause it's actually a pretty good movie in parts. Hayden's terrible acting is actually a boon to his character in this film because he's just supposed to be an embodiment of irrational anger.
Why do some elevate ROTS above the other prequel films?
Some of ya'll need to rewatch A New Hope with no nostalgia involved. It is not that great of a film by any means.
Incredible for its time and a game changer but yeah, all these years later its really not that impressive. Its kind of amazing how loyal the OT fanbase is
Cause it's actually a pretty good movie in parts. Hayden's terrible acting is actually a boon to his character in this film because he's just supposed to be an embodiment of irrational anger.
Because the direction the story is moving carries enough weight to keep people intrigued even through some terribly acted and terribly written scenes.
TPM has basically no weight throughout. AOTC tries but flubs most of the scenes that represent significant turning points/moments of introspection for the characters. ROTS has some hammy lines and bad interactions between Padme and Anakin, but puts Palpatine front and center which makes the turning points much stronger.
Some of ya'll need to rewatch A New Hope with no nostalgia involved. It is not that great of a film by any means.
Incredible for its time and a game changer but yeah, all these years later its really not that impressive
Some of ya'll need to rewatch A New Hope with no nostalgia involved. It is not that great of a film by any means.
Incredible for its time and a game changer but yeah, all these years later its really not that impressive
It's really a question of which bad movie to put above the other bad movies.Why do some elevate ROTS above the other prequel films?
It's really a question of which bad movie to put above the other bad movies.
As for for the TFA v. ANH comparisons: it shares some broad plot strokes and even a few ideas (similar MacGuffin). But once you step down to the character level and their respective arcs, the comparison falls apart completely.
first time I've seen this sentiment...lol
Force Awakens was so derivative it was basically a reboot of ANH!
What? How?
For Star Wars fans watching The Phantom Menace for the first time back in 1999, one thing was immediately clear: there were a lot of similarities to A New Hope. In fact, some critics called out what they saw as a simple rehash of the original storyline. And on the surface, the criticism certainly appears justified. After all, both films center around a young boy on the desert planet of Tatooine who leaves home to embark on an epic journey involving a beautiful, royal young woman in distress and a Jedi Knight who becomes his mentor.
Now, according to George Lucas, the similarities were deliberate. And during the making of the prequels, he actually spoke fairly often about this use of repetition in Star Wars. “I create themes,” he told Entertainment Weekly back in 2002, “and I repeat those themes, in different chords and different arrangements.”
People be seeing that article?
"Star Wars Fan Debunks Huff Post's "40 Unforgivable Plot Holes in The Force Awakens""
I think I agree with the fan on 9/10 of them.
Just to quote sphagnum from Spoiler Thread #2, Pablo Hidalgo's confirmed a few details regarding Kylo and Rey on Twitter since the film released.
This, to me, increases the chances of her not being related to Luke.-Luke's Jedi shouldn't be thought of as a "Jedi Academy"
-Kylo Ren's attack on the Jedi "wasn't that long ago" and was "more recent than 14/15 years"
-Therefore unless the child Rey we saw in the vision is supposed to be older than 5 or 6, she was left on Jakku before the attack
-Kylo tells Rey in the novel "It is you!" not because he recognizes her from his past but because he recognizes her as the one who experienced an awakening.
I mean a lot of A New Hope is just flat out boring. People bash Lucas for all kinds of dragging out scenes in the prequels and yet we get like 15 straight minutes of 3P0 and R2 walking around Tattoine and fucking around with Jawas. Then we get 30 minutes of Obi, Luke, and Han wandering around the Deathstar. I dont feel like that film holds up well at all.
I mean a lot of A New Hope is just flat out boring. People bash Lucas for all kinds of dragging out scenes in the prequels and yet we get like 15 straight minutes of 3P0 and R2 walking around Tattoine and fucking around with Jawas. Then we get 30 minutes of Obi, Luke, and Han wandering around the Deathstar. I dont feel like that film holds up well at all.
why is attack of the clones hated the most?
Again though, we put up with the 30+ minutes of Obi, Luke and Han wandering around because they are great characters. It doesn't matter what they are doing, they are fun to be around. The problem with the prequels, especially Episode I, is those characters are awful to be around. The only one with any personality is Jar Jar and you want to shoot him in the face.
I mean a lot of A New Hope is just flat out boring. People bash Lucas for all kinds of dragging out scenes in the prequels and yet we get like 15 straight minutes of 3P0 and R2 walking around Tattoine and fucking around with Jawas. Then we get 30 minutes of Obi, Luke, and Han wandering around the Deathstar. I dont feel like that film holds up well at all.
why is attack of the clones hated the most?
This, to me, increases the chances of her not being related to Luke.
The film actual being about Anakin becoming vader makes it even worse because it is so bad written and badly executed.Because the direction the story is moving carries enough weight to keep people intrigued even through some terribly acted and terribly written scenes.
Just watched RotS again. Spotty dialogue and acting in places but it's loads of fun, great action, opera scene is amazing, cinematography is mostly excellent, wonderful music and lastly still disagree hardcore with those who don't like the final duel. Story wise it moves at a great pace and is just far more entertaining than the first two.
Of course it's all fine when it comes to opinions, but hey, opinions are being questioned and here's the answers, at least for myself. I put it over RotJ. Easily.