Square-Enix considering making FFXV an action RPG

NeoUltima said:
The only ones who really have authority over what Final Fantasy is suppose to be are the original creators.
They generally have the final say, since they're the ones making and selling the games.
NeoUltima said:
Aside from that, everyone has a right to their opinion. And I think it is disgusting to include MMOs in the main series.

I doubt it was the choice of the developers to call FFXI and FFXIV what they were. It was a decision by the head-honchos wanting to take advantage of a 'number' for extra sales.
It really isn't possible to know this from outside of Square-Enix. Your assumption that they're unrelated products that were later turned into FF games is nothing but a huge assumption based your own dislike of the MMORPG genre.
NeoUltima said:
Those fans help pay their salaries. I would hope the developers would listen to what they want.
There are some cases where I completely agree with this, and others where the fanbase is a writhing mass of internet rage without any clear message for the developers to hear.
 
It doesn't matter if it turns into an action RPG... what matters most is they should hire someone competent to make a strong storyline and a great cast of characters.
 
Orayn said:
They generally have the final say, since they're the ones making and selling the games.
Except the original creators are not making Final Fantasy anymore, which was my point.

Orayn said:
It really isn't possible to know this from outside of Square-Enix. Your assumption that they're unrelated products that were later turned into FF games is nothing but a huge assumption based your own dislike of the MMORPG genre.
Where did I say they were unrelated products turned into MMOs? They were Final Fantasy games always. I said they decided to put numbers on them, and make them part of the mainline series, to increase sales.

The bolded, now that is quite an assumption. I do not hate MMOs at all.
 
I don't have a problem with them taking action RPG route, problem is the action RPGs they have made before didn't have very good combat systems. But I think they can get better, I haven't played BbS much, can't say about it, I like Type-0 combat but certain things still don't translate well here.

One of the things I think XIII's combat system handled very good, is the Status Ailments, they were key to the battle and exploiting them was very fun. I think most battles and encounters weren't very well designed, they could use the system they had in place better, it really shows in some late missions how good and fun it is.

I think with a realtime system, where you have to control your character's movements, dodge attacks etc. it's hard to have something like that on top of it, can make the battles somewhat overwhelming. Status effects are there in type-0 but they are not that important, you can ignore them for the whole game and everything is moving so fast and you can die so fast that you can't even think about these things, maybe a pause and issue command system on top of realtime combat would work.
 
Plywood said:
Personally, when FF7 gets remade I'd like it to be an action rpg.

final-fantasy-vii-dirge-of-cerberus--na-box.jpg


Close enough.
 
sponk said:
is there even a place on the final fantasy coffin to place yet another nail in? I don't think so, so, go ahead square.
It's not too late to make a God Hand inspired beat-em-up starring Sabin and save the series.
 
-_- as long as its a good turn base RPG I hate it that no one is wanting to make the type of games I love

they nothing wrong with old school RPG noone making them that what wrong with them
 
It can be versus, it can be another game based on a KH-like engine, I don't really care. Just as long as it isn't rigid mock-action RPG which is actually all based on numbers, making you "miss" when you clearly sliced right through something because of some arbitrary stat. And isn't trying to imitate other successful RPGs from the west pretty much.

Always be true to yourself, Square-Enix. Don't listen to any of them, I love you just the way you are.
 
I wouldn't mind, hopefully they bring back the adventuring/exploring aspects back and a more open story telling (npc dialogues, lores, interesting locales) instead of datalog, they could do whatever they want with the combat and gameplay.
 
Kagari said:
I wasn't going to post this because I think the question itself is terrible... so here's my thoughts instead:

Asking about a game that's not even announced is fairly rude and shows you don't care about games the developers are actually working on. Final Fantasy Versus XIII and XIV relaunch haven't even happened yet, so if anything, these journalists need to stop prodding about things that don't even exist.

Yes, I realize the irony in that I myself have done interviews with the FF development staff, but I would never ask them something this dumb.
I don't think so.

Sure, outright asking "Hey! What's Final Fantasy 15 gonna be like?" is rude, but if something like "How do you plan to continue evolving the series' traditional battle formula in future mainline entries?" is tossed in with a majority of FF 13-2 questions, I see no problems/rudeness.
 
After the disaster that has been the last 2 games, I don't give a shit what they do as long as they can actually make a "decent" game.
 
shuyin_ said:
Hmm, Tetsuya Nomura makes action-RPGs. FF XV confirmed as the first main series FF game directed by Nomura?
Except Nomura has said Versus XIII would be the (first &) last of its kind (a FF game directed by him). Of course he could always change his mind, but that's something that we'll have to wait until at least Versus & Kingdom Hearts III (which will almost 100% likely be his next big game after Versus) have been released.


And I think it is disgusting to include MMOs in the main series.
It's just a name, kinda silly you would take it so seriously as to be disgusted by a game having XI after it instead of "Online". >_>


They need a visionary building their game, not the pre-existing market. Where is their Matsuno? Their Sakaguchi? I hope Square pulls it's shit together and remembers it can't just throw money and existing tropes at a game and hope it comes together.
You may not like his style, but Nomura is what you're after. He's been more or less involved with most of the decent to great games Square Enix has done in recent years (the likes of The World Ends With You, Birth By Sleep, Dissidia, 3rd Birthday etc.).
 
No thanks. Can we not just have some turn based games? Why does every single RPG need to become an action RPG? I was excited for the Lufia 2 remake until they actioned that up too.
 
Spiegel said:
FFVersus = FFXV
FF Versus = FF XIII spinoff. Or, if you don't agree with the 'spinoff' label, FF versus = FNC title =/= main numbered FF title

Famassu said:
Except Nomura has said Versus XIII would be the (first &) last of its kind (a FF game directed by him).
Are you talking about the same Nomura that said KH 2 will not have a Final Mix? Or that you won't get to see all the FF7 characters fight together in Advent CHildren because that'd just be overkill?

Take my advice and don't trust Nomura.
 
Long as it's good I'll play it, but square really needs to work on party control when it comes to their ARPGs.

Partymembers in the KH games are practically non-existent.

Can someone say whether or not Type-0's ability to switch party-leader on the fly helps alleviate this somewhat?
 
The turn-based combat was actually pretty good in FF13.

It was the linearity and structure/design that made the game a steaming pile, not the combat. But whatever, I'm all for them trying the action-rpg route if they're able to pull it off.
 
shuyin_ said:
FF Versus = FF XIII spinoff. Or, if you don't agree with the 'spinoff' label, FF versus = FNC title =/= main numbered FF title
Nomura at least considers Versus XIII very much as a numbered title and so does Square Enix, considering how they've given Nomura free hands to do whatever he likes.


Are you talking about the same Nomura that said KH 2 will not have a Final Mix?
Was that before or after KHII's release? Because vanilla KHII was somewhat of a product of fan feedback (they got feedback that KHI was a bit too hard & that the exploration wasn't that fun -> KHII was made easier & level designs were streamlined) & Final Mix was kinda made as a response to the post-release criticism they got from II (higher difficulty level, more extra stuff, some small changes to the battle system etc.).

Take my advice and don't trust Nomura.
You didn't really give any good reason not to trust him. He's pretty open about stuff (at least stuff the PR department doesn't completely shut his mouth about), so I'd rather believe his words than take your advice. I mean, yeah, Nomura still has many, many years of game development ahead of him (if he so chooses) so it wouldn't be out of the realm of possibilities that he'd take on directing another FF sometime in the future (if he stays at Square Enix), but at this point he seems to have other plans for his future, plans I doubt Square Enix has too much interest in changing at the moment, given the success of Kingdom Hearts & other Nomura influenced games. At least at the moment he's making Versus like it's his one & only chance at directing a Final Fantasy game and it's his ultimate vision of Final Fantasy. I'd expect him to focus on Kingdom Hearts and perhaps some new IPs for at least the next 5+ years after Versus XIII's release, so FFXV being directed by Nomura is highly unlikely, imho. Of course he'll likely still have some role in future FFs' development, but I'm positive it won't be in the director's role.
 
Famassu said:
Nomura at least considers Versus XIII very much as a numbered title and so does Square Enix, considering how they've given Nomura free hands to do whatever he likes.
This isn't about what Nomura considers his game to be. If he'd consider Crisis Core to be a main numbered title, would that make it a main FF?

It's the same with Versus, regardless of the fact that Versus is more ambitious game than Crisis Core. In the end, it's still a spinoff, while FF XV will be a main FF game.


Famassu said:
Was that before or after KHII's release?
IIRC, it was after the release, but does it really matter? The guy made a statement that there won't be a Final Mix. In the end, KH2 got Final Mix +. Now don't get me wrong, i'm not complaining; it's just that his statements should be taken with a grain of salt.

Famassu said:
You didn't really give any good reason not to trust him.
You mean the contradiction between what he says and what is real isn't reason enough?
I'm not saying he is a liar. Maybe it's just conjuncture, but he made quite a few statements (like the AC stuff and KH2 final mix +) that were proven to be false.

I guess what aggravates his statements is his certainty... that KH2 interview was along the lines of 'don't expect a final mix this time'. lol, yeah
 
Anyway I doubt they will rename Versus to XV. Versus is something Nomura can do a FF he wants without affecting the main series. Labeling it a main title number will probably limit and pressure him.
 
Sucks, there seems to be no place to go except back to the past if I want to play quality turn-based RPGs. I'd love to see a game like FF9 again, great story and high production... but still retaining that heart that the classic FF titles had.
 
Re-branding Versus as the new mainline FF would only improve its sales by a fuckton. I don't know why the fuck are fans of the game against that.
 
Regulus Tera said:
Re-branding Versus as the new mainline FF would only improve its sales by a fuckton. I don't know why the fuck are fans of the game against that.

Because that would probably force them to make it multiplatform, which would hurt Nomura's glorious Sony-driven vision.
 
Regulus Tera said:
Re-branding Versus as the new mainline FF would only improve its sales by a fuckton. I don't know why the fuck are fans of the game against that.

I don't know anything about branding, marketing, or the current state of the FFXIII brand - how will this work?
 
we.are.the.armada said:
I don't know anything about branding, marketing, or the current state of the FFXIII brand - how will this work?
It's a mess. "Fabula Nova Crystallis" was supposed to be a sort of constellation of FFXIII-like games like what FFVII got. It was supposed to included the original, Versus, Agito, and eventually more, but Squeenix seems to have scrubbed that idea when they turned Agito into Type-0. As far as I know, Versus doesn't have any direct connections to XIII either, just similar themes and a (possibly?) shared setting.
 
Orayn said:
It's a mess. "Fabula Nova Crystallis" was supposed to be a sort of constellation of FFXIII-like games like what FFVII got. It was supposed to included the original, Versus, Agito, and eventually more, but Squeenix seems to have scrubbed that idea when they turned Agito into Type-0. As far as I know, Versus doesn't have any direct connections to XIII either, just similar themes and a (possibly?) shared setting.

Shared mythology (Etro, Fal'Cie, L'Cie, etc.)
 
I initially thought that this is a stupid idea, but then I remembered that Square's other action rpg series these days is Kingdom Hearts, which is a lot more fun than any numbered Final Fantasy made in the last decade (10 was released in July 2001 so that doesn't count as the last decade anymore.) A new FF that plays like Kingdom Hearts is worth a shot, I guess.
 
we.are.the.armada said:
I don't know anything about branding, marketing, or the current state of the FFXIII brand - how will this work?

It works that a mothership will always sell more than a spin-off.
 
7Th said:
Because that would probably force them to make it multiplatform, which would hurt Nomura's glorious Sony-driven vision.
Do we want to save Squeenix or do we want to jack Nomura off?
Why am I asking questions I know the answer to?
we.are.the.armada said:
I don't know anything about branding, marketing, or the current state of the FFXIII brand - how will this work?
Because Final Fantasy numbered games sell more than spin-offs.

This is not MegaTen, peoples!
 
Regulus Tera said:
Re-branding Versus as the new mainline FF would only improve its sales by a fuckton. I don't know why the fuck are fans of the game against that.


true... honestly... just taking off the XIII will drive sales... let FFXIII-2 be the end of that chapter and let Versus stand on it's own...

as a new entry in the FF franchise... it would sell a ton and give square-enix a head start on next gen rather than succumb to another huge dev cycle that XIII took. They could upgrade the graphics and fine tune it... turning it into a monster of a game that could release at the PS4 launch.

with all the rumors swirling around that this gen is coming to a close sooner rather than later... it's smarter for square-enix to re-brand this game as Final Fantasy XV
 
Link1110 said:
I initially thought that this is a stupid idea, but then I remembered that Square's other action rpg series these days is Kingdom Hearts, which is a lot more fun than any numbered Final Fantasy made in the last decade (10 was released in July 2001 so that doesn't count as the last decade anymore.) A new FF that plays like Kingdom Hearts is worth a shot, I guess.
Uhh... Isn't that what Versus XIII is, almost exactly?
 
Top Bottom