Star Trek into Darkness |OT| Not very tired at all

Status
Not open for further replies.
Saw this last night at a 11:15 showing. Well, it was SUPPOSE to be a 11:15 showing, but it was delayed for 15 minutes before the cops showed up and had some guy walk with them out of the theater for some unknown reason. (dude didn't look sketchy, but I think I heard he might have had a concealed weapon and the theater has a no gun policy or something)


ANYWAYS, the movie eventually did start and I really loved it. Pretty cool story that the trailers did a good job avoiding spoilers, some great visuals (apart from one PARTICULARLY awful lens flare that JJ put in there during a rather dramatic moment), and the sound was pretty amazing too.

Ending kinda overstays its welcome with about one action scene too many, but I liked pretty much everything else.


Oh, and I saw it in IMAX 3D and didn't find the 3D very impressive. I think I remember being more impressed with Iron Man's 3D than this. There were maybe 2-3 shots in the whole movie that actually looked really cool and enhanced by the 3D, especially every time the ship goes into warp. Very cool effect with that.
 
So, the 3D in this movie is actually very well done. I'd suggest for you guys to see it in 3D. Saw the first 10 minutes yesterday at the Academy here in Los Angeles where the writer and editors were present I can tell you guys it was amazing!!!
 
Saw this last night at a 11:15 showing. Well, it was SUPPOSE to be a 11:15 showing, but it was delayed for 15 minutes before the cops showed up and had some guy walk with them out of the theater for some unknown reason. (dude didn't look sketchy, but I think I heard he might have had a concealed weapon and the theater has a no gun policy or something)


ANYWAYS, the movie eventually did start and I really loved it. Pretty cool story that the trailers did a good job avoiding spoilers, some great visuals (apart from one PARTICULARLY awful lens flare that JJ put in there during a rather dramatic moment), and the sound was pretty amazing too.

Ending kinda overstays its welcome with about one action scene too many, but I liked pretty much everything else.

is that unusual?
 
I see people talking about 'glossing over' the many plot holes in STiD and how it isn't a big deal. Well I don't agree with that but I can at least see where they are coming from.

What I cannot abide however is 'character motivation holes' and 'cohesive drama holes' which STiD is littered with.

Both of those are far more offensive to me and far more damaging to the film than 'mere' plot holes. People will point out that Orci/Kurtzman aren't involved with Abrams Star Wars film but they weren't involved with Super 8 and that had the exact same problems at all his other films.



Star Star?

Star Trek Wars
 
is that unusual?

Not that I'm aware of, especially what happened with the Dark Knight Rises shooting. I'm just repeating what I heard someone in the theater mumble, so he might not have or maybe he didn't have a ticket, haha.

The 3 cops came in one at the entrance and two walked up the side aisle and just looked at everyone for about 10-15 minutes until they flagged the dude down and walked him out. All I heard was the guy asking "did I do something wrong?" and the police officer saying "no, we just need to talk" or something like that.
 
Not that I'm aware of, especially what happened with the Dark Knight Rises shooting. I'm just repeating what I heard someone in the theater mumble, so he might not have or maybe he didn't have a ticket, haha.

The 3 cops came in one at the entrance and two walked up the side aisle and just looked at everyone for about 10-15 minutes until they flagged the dude down and walked him out. All I heard was the guy asking "did I do something wrong?" and the police officer saying "no, we just need to talk" or something like that.

Ah I just thought by the way you wrote it that it wasn't unusual to bring one with you.
 
I wear glasses and not the small "wire frame" kind so it's extremely uncomfortable to wear those cheap plastic 3D glasses over these glasses. It would be different if they offered goggle type 3D or 3D glasses that fit over these but they don't.

The last movie i saw in 3D was avatar and it was so uncomfortable i had to walk out and they gave me tickets to the 2D. If i didn't wear glasses or if they offered 3D glasses designed for people who wear glasses i would totally see more 3D films. Why do they not? Do they not understand a good portion of our population wears glasses? I'm sure some theaters offer them but none of my do.

Can you get contact lenses just for movie viewing?
 
In reply to xandaca, not a direct reply because to directly reply would unfortunately force me to stare at spoiler wall....

Without seeing this yet, what people need to understand is that this is earlier in the federation than alot of the Star Trek than people are used to in the older Trek not even factoring in alternate time line and Abrams fucking so the way things are responded to are different and not as defined or refined and definitely flawed.

That's an interesting point, but I'd argue that the humanist angle is (for me, anyway) a philosophical choice which makes the series special in addition to being a key component of the Federation's behaviour. In other words, any show or movie bearing the Star Trek name should have some sort of ethical core, like Kirk learning to do the right thing rather than resort to violence, even if the people and organisations within the narrative do not always behave in a morally righteous manner, as was often the case with Sisko (or the many corrupt admirals in some of Picard's best civil rights episodes). Into Darkness was entertaining enough, but pretty much ignored the moral imperatives of what it was depicting onscreen (even though there was a great opportunity to take an interesting look at early Federation moral grey areas, as you point out) and thus didn't feel much like Star Trek to me personally.

EDIT: While I didn't watch a lot of it due to its general rubbishness (from what I saw), wasn't Enterprise supposed to be about exactly those kinds of challenges (militarisation, inter-species conflict) prior to the creation of the Federation proper in the final episode?
 
Can you get contact lenses just for movie viewing?

That's what I normally do - I just wear contacts if I know I'm watching a movie in 3D but I wear my glasses more regularly.

Though you'd probably have to pay for the fitting, having at least a box of contacts on hand is nice, especially if you only wear them every so often.
 
EDIT: While I didn't watch a lot of it due to its general rubbishness (from what I saw), wasn't Enterprise supposed to be about exactly those kinds of challenges (militarisation, inter-species conflict) prior to the creation of the Federation proper in the final episode?

Short non-spoiler answer: Yes, kinda.
Spoilery answer (both movie and Enterprise show):
Funnily enough, Peter Weller actually played a very similar character in this movie and in one of the final Enterprise story arcs. In Enterprise he was some rich mining guy who was Xenophobic to all aliens and wanted Earth to be for humans.
 
Saw it last night. Loved it. Only had some minor quips about how quickly they flew past some character motivations/backstory, but man it was slick and Benedict is a main draw here.

IMAX well worth it, 3D, yet again, unnecessary.
 
Saw this yesterday through employer, and it was beautiful and fun and totally worth seeing. however, I got to say I am SICK of Damon Lindelof joints. Dude on the regular disregards establishing stakes and always gotta go having his characters throw out common sense for the sake of him creating heroism.

Every single time there's an away team, the Enterprise imperils it's entire command staff and only them. Aren't there like thousands of crew on board?

Meanwhile most every conflict is resolved by a deus ex, sometimes set on the mantle as a Chekov's gun in the most ham-fisted way. Every hour since I saw it, it's gone down in my estimation. Really unnecessarily weak in spots, which is frustrating.

some nonsense that bummed me out:

why the fuck did Kirk steal that scroll thing from the planet they started off on?
why did nobody acknowledge that Khan murdered like 16 million people when he crash-landed into San Francisco--why should I have half-a-shit about Kirk's bullshit resurrection in light of that just having happened?
"he replaced the fuel cells with his crewmates in cryo" then how the fuck are the torpedoes propelled?
"we've got to take him alive!" dog, you can get blood out of a dead body.
Khan pilots a dreadnaut twice as big as the Enterprise by himself (having everyone and their mother say "it was configured for a light crew" again and again doesn't really alleviate this)

Generally the pacing is kind of weird when you stop to examine it. Like
when the Enterprise falls out of the sky
, it's like you just got through what you thought was the climactic conflict, resolved through a whole series of real tense operations, then get a tiny little moment of reprieve, then the stakes rocket right back up to where they were. they already had the stakes of
stopping Khan from his kamikaze landing/apprehending him generally
why not just take that instead of piling on
enterprise drive failure
as well.

anyway, now I'm going off on this piece, but it's got a total Prometheus feel: really awesome in stretches, generally solid premise, fantastic visual aesthetic, with the added bonus of charm and chemistry from the cast, but the story totally falls apart under any scrutiny.
 
As much as I enjoy these movies I wish they would tone down the action scenes and special effects a bit..
This would have the added benefit of:
A. Slightly shorter, potentially better paced.
B. Less shoehorning in poor plot points to justify some action scene they wanted to do.
C. Cheaper and hopefully faster to produce.

FOUR YEARS between these movies is kinda ridiculous to me for a light, fun action series they are.

They could also do with calming down the tone a bit more often. It's not so much a gentle build up to a climax as it is PEAK, valley, PEAK, valley, PEAK, PEAK, PEEEEEEAAAAAK, PEAK, valley.
 
The one time I tried wearing my contacts for a 3D film it was actually harder to see the 3D for some reason, so I just put up with wearing the 3D glasses over my regular glasses.

That sucks, never had a problem with mine but I do hate the yellow plastic glasses they give you for IMAX, those things suck...

Best 3D glasses I ever wore on top of my glasses were actually the ones you get when riding Star Tours in Disneyland, they have a 'goggle-type' feel and are padded. Real3Ds are okay, but slip off too easily.
 
So do you think in the next one we will get
the start of the 5 year mission, or at least the Enterprise exploring deep space? I feel like they are free now to really do something original but I fear they are going to stay lassoed to "repeating with a twist". I really want to see something completely original with this crew as I like all of them so much.
I also hope the next one will come much faster, but with JJ doing Star Wars (and Disney wanting one every 2 years). I cant imagine Star Trek will be touched for a while unless its a new director.
 
Saw it today, and really liked it. I think enjoyed it even more than the last film. Less head scratchers and better villains.

I guess my only real gripe would be with how they brought Kirk back. I give them credit for setting it up early, what with the girl in the hospital and the dead tribble, but when I think "radiation", I think a person getting cooked from the inside out. I don't see a brain being able to come back from that. I'll freely admit this could be a silly peeve, given the loose science they use everywhere else.

Also would like to see more space combat in the third film. We got a little here, but it consisted mostly of the Enterprise getting pounded.

I wouldn't mind seeing another TV series based on this universe, even if the budget would obviously need to be scaled down, and perhaps another crew would need to be used.
 
Plot question:

Did they ever explain if the Klingons realized they were attacked by Federation personnel? Or if there was going to be a full scale war between Klingons + Federation because of that small battle on Kronos?
 
Plot question:

Did they ever explain if the Klingons realized they were attacked by Federation personnel? Or if there was going to be a full scale war between Klingons + Federation because of that small battle on Kronos?
it feels like they just completely dropped that plot line at the end, or said "Hey, we know there is an invasion force coming at some point, but lets send our most advanced ship on a 5 year mission far away from home anyway!"

Maybe the idea is all the klingons that would know it was humans attacking were killed by Kahn.
 
it feels like they just completely dropped that plot line at the end, or said "Hey, we know there is an invasion force coming at some point, but lets send our most advanced ship on a 5 year mission far away from home anyway!"

Maybe the idea is all the klingons that would know it was humans attacking were killed by Kahn.
I can see the Klingons being used in the third movie, but what I took from it is that the "imminent" invasion was a partial delusion of the admiral. Additionally, since none of the characters were in Federation uniforms, or using a Federation ship, even if the Klingons did find out about the landing, they may not have had enough evidence to conclude it was the Federation that was there.

There's also the chance that even if Klingons did conclude it was the Federation that was there, it's no guarantee they'll go to war over it. The situation seems pretty similar to the Cold War, with instances where the powers could go to war, but eventually negotiate some agreement that stops it from happening.
 
Dear lord that was dumb and pointless. Meh overall.

this is important - don't expect a smart movie (you've all seen Star Trek 2009 so you should probably know this). You're going to watch it because of Cumberbatch and Simon Pegg and, I don't know, pretty CGI effects?
 
the plot issues with the first Abrams Star Trek bugged the shit out of me, and generally that stuff always drives me crazy. But I still have to see this movie in theaters. Basically, only going for ILM goodness and Cumberbatch.
 
I plan to go see it on sunday... guess not?

The vast majority of comments and reviews on here are glowing about it. I thought it was incredibly engaging and fun. Yes in the end its not the smartest film ever made, but it has a great pace to it and lots of excitement. I suggest seeing it if you go to movies to have fun and feel good in the end. If your going to a ST6: Undiscovered Country feel you will be disappointed (thought there is a direct quote referenced from it! Good ol' Torpedo Dr. Bones)
 
A lot of people are getting hung up on this.
The point wasn't whether Kirk was going to be eventually revived or not, the point was the moment Spock and Kirk share as Kirk is dieing. Kirk coming back doesn't ruin that scene.


Yeah, you kinda needed to be there. The scene was fine, but as soon as Spock runs down and talks with Scotty, this woman started going "whaaaat? No! No... he can't! Don't die!" while sobbing, not necessarily any emotional response towards the exchange between the two. Mind you, we were in one of the VIP theaters where alcohol is served, so we think that she was pretty drunk by then too.
 
Saw this last night at a 11:15 showing. Well, it was SUPPOSE to be a 11:15 showing, but it was delayed for 15 minutes before the cops showed up and had some guy walk with them out of the theater for some unknown reason. (dude didn't look sketchy, but I think I heard he might have had a concealed weapon and the theater has a no gun policy or something)


ANYWAYS, the movie eventually did start and I really loved it. Pretty cool story that the trailers did a good job avoiding spoilers, some great visuals (apart from one PARTICULARLY awful lens flare that JJ put in there during a rather dramatic moment), and the sound was pretty amazing too.

Ending kinda overstays its welcome with about one action scene too many, but I liked pretty much everything else.


Oh, and I saw it in IMAX 3D and didn't find the 3D very impressive. I think I remember being more impressed with Iron Man's 3D than this. There were maybe 2-3 shots in the whole movie that actually looked really cool and enhanced by the 3D, especially every time the ship goes into warp. Very cool effect with that.


Lincoln Square Cinema at Bellevue?
 
I saw it last night, I loved it and I liked it more than Star Trek 2009.

Yeah, the writing gets a little weak in spots (but what Trek movie doesn't) but the movies overall entertainment value and chemistry between the cast really helped mask that in my opinion.

I'd say "Into Darkness" feels like a decent hybrid of older Trek movies with a lot of the JJ-flavor thrown into it. I'd put it in my top 5 favorite Trek films, hands down.
 
Yeah, the writing gets a little weak in spots (but what Trek movie doesn't) but the movies overall entertainment value and chemistry between the cast really helped mask that in my opinion.

Much like the way a can of air fresher masks the overpowering smell of shit in a toilet frequented by those experiencing chronic intestinal distress?

Best movie I've seen in theaters since Star Trek 2009. Well worth the wait.

GO TO THE CINEMA MORE OFTEN THEN!!!!!
 
Liked a few scenes, hated a ton of others. Found I absolutely hate the cast as a whole, besides Cumberbatch. Main complaint is the film is ultimately the most gutless movie I've seen in years. No stakes, no anything.
 
There was no tension in this movie, way too much fan service, and Cumberbatch chewed scenery in a way that would make Anthony Hopkins blush.
 
Liked a few scenes, hated a ton of others. Found I absolutely hate the cast as a whole, besides Cumberbatch. Main complaint is the film is ultimately the most gutless movie I've seen in years. No stakes, no anything.

Jeez. I thought it would be about real sacrifice. Judging from the trailer it seemed we would be at our darkest hour.

There was no tension in this movie, way too much fan service, and Cumberbatch chewed scenery in a way that would make Anthony Hopkins blush.

:(
Do I sell my tickets?

Great, now everyone is going to shit on JJ when he starts Star Wars. :(
 
:(
Do I sell my tickets?

Great, now everyone is going to shit on JJ when he starts Star Wars. :(

No. Go see the movie and have your own experience. Just because I didn't like it doesn't mean you won't. It's also good to note that Lindelof had a had in writing the script. I saw that in the credits and had a kind of "Aha!" moment, as in "So that's why it sucked." Hopefully Damon L stays far away from the SW universe.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom