GentlemanCrow
Member
There are only 3 movies in my canon. It's a glorious canon.
There are only 3 movies in my canon. It's a glorious canon.
It does still matter though. Lucas left Lucasfilm nearly two years ago yet just a few months back Lucasfilm says the George Lucas approved I-VI & The Clone Wars are the immovable objects of canon that all future work must align to.That's the point though, what does that really mean and why does it really matter unless future films are dependent on small stuff he introduces. I think its safe to say that George Lucas isn't Star Wars anymore. Its always bothered me that its treated as some kind of unquestionable sense of validation. It shouldn't matter anymore.
Hell, I showed friends the Genndy Tartakovsky Clone Wars and one told me it shits all over the CGI show. They asked me why it wasn't considered canon and I couldn't come up with a good answer for them.
It does still matter though. Lucas left Lucasfilm nearly two years ago yet just a few months back Lucasfilm says the George Lucas approved I-VI & The Clone Wars are the immovable objects of canon that all future work must align to.
Just because George Lucas himself left his company he created won't suddenly stop treating his personal work as anything less than sacred. Many companies still treat their founders as sacred and untouchable long after they are gone.
And Tartakovsky series isn't canon simply because Lucas himself declared it doesn't count when working on his take on the Clone Wars and Lucasfilm is using what Lucas himself deemed canon as the pillar to use going forward.
But yet they throw out his treatments for 7-9....
But as my good friend asked me last night, why do them in the first place? More importantly, why say they are not canon if they don't contradict anything else. Ventress isn't killed obviously, Greivous' cough can be hand waived, and the very last few episodes literally were the opening crawl.
Reading through the history of the sequels, it kills me that Lucas originally imagined Luke having a love interest in VII-IX. Guess he wasn't as bitter then, eh?
That's the point though, what does that really mean and why does it really matter unless future films are dependent on small stuff he introduces. I think its safe to say that George Lucas isn't Star Wars anymore. Its always bothered me that its treated as some kind of unquestionable sense of validation. It shouldn't matter anymore.
Hell, I showed friends the Genndy Tartakovsky Clone Wars and one told me it shits all over the CGI show. They asked me why it wasn't considered canon and I couldn't come up with a good answer for them.
where are you getting this from? you don't mean the zahn trilogy, do you? that's total EU stuff. Err, well I guess it's "Legends" now -- though once Episode VII is out and establishes a true backstory for these characters it's not much of a legend anymore, it's more of a lie.
I'd be in favor of him having a love interest, but who knows if that will happen now
Nope, an interview Lucas gave in 1988. Starlog #127
I stopped caring about EU stuff once they decided to repeat the Prequels with the twins. Such a crappy story arc.
iirc it was simply that Lucas didn't like it all that much.
Very cool look for Han if real. Definitely calls back to the 'Western in Space' motif.
Is this Star Wars or Firefly?
I kinda love it.
Not sure if posted already, seen this randomly on twitter, don't know if concept art or fan made
When it comes to what's officially canon or not... Who cares what the author (or mega corp copywrite holder) says? It's not like this shit actually happened, why not just decide yourself? If something has no appeal outside of it's canonical status it's probably pretty crap anyway.
Simply because it's their work.
When it comes to what's officially canon or not... Who cares what the author (or mega corp copywrite holder) says? It's not like this shit actually happened, why not just decide yourself? If something has no appeal outside of it's canonical status it's probably pretty crap anyway.
Whoever owns the IP. You can organize and pick apart whatever you want in your head, but that won't have any effect on the overall reaching scope of the accepted canon. It only makes things confusing for you.
The Clone Wars is on equal footing with the movies. It came straight from George Lucas. There is no way to parse this statement. They make it as blatant as possible. The Clone Wars is not "expanded" at all.
To Lucasfilm The Clone Wars is equal in canon as say The Empire Strikes Back.
http://www.starwars.com/news/the-legendary-star-wars-expanded-universe-turns-a-new-page
Immovable object. That is as clear as it can get.
I swear at one point Lucas said Shadows of the Empire was canon.
Lucas never called Shadows of the Empire canon. It was only canon in the same way the rest of the EU was. George Lucas himself only considered the 6 films + The Clone Wars canon. Which is why they get deemed the immovable status going forward. The sort of sacred ground canon since it came from the "maker".
Well, I hope they stick to it.
I think I just lack faith in Lucas' statement. I mean, I wouldn't be upset if Gardulla the Hutt was wiped from history. I kind of like knowing that Mortis exists though.
Hopefully Clone Wars will be included in the Journal of the Whills boxset that includes all 11 films when it's released in 2025.
the new canon rule comes from george lucas? didnt that happen after he sold to disney?
It's not confusing at all. There are only three Star Wars films. They just released a trailer for a fourth. It's been 31 years since the last film and this new one shows promise. Maybe one day they will go back and make films about Ben helping Bail Organa out during the 'clone wars' - whatever those are. We'll get to see how he met Luke's dad.
Came from lucasfilm post sale. But Lucasfilm was created by Lucas, of course he and his work will remain treated as untouchable. It's like Apple with Steve Jobs or Disney with Walt Disneythe new canon rule comes from george lucas? didnt that happen after he sold to disney?
It's not confusing at all. There are only three Star Wars films. They just released a trailer for a fourth. It's been 31 years since the last film and this new one shows promise. Maybe one day they will go back and make films about Ben helping Bail Organa out during the 'clone wars' - whatever those are. We'll get to see how he met Luke's dad.
Until you don't like this film and it's still three films.
So I take it you love the show Rebels thenThat's a negative way of putting it. I love Star Wars. If it's anything like the existing trilogy then I'm bound to love.
So I take it you love the show Rebels then
I saw the five minute teaser they released. Superficially looked more like the OT. I've heard they are using unused McQuarrie designs which is a nice touch. Obviously geared to a younger audience and it will also have to bridge the gap between the Prequels and the OT which I have no interest in.
Making Star Wars is saying their sources are telling them the first spin-off film will be the young Han Solo film.
http://makingstarwars.net/2014/12/first-star-wars-spin-off-han-solo-plus-production-codename/
They went on to say the word around the current production at Pinewood is that Aaron Paul is looking to be attached to the first Star Wars spin-off film in some fashion. There was no direct implication he was playing Han Solo.