Luke only ever said he was on the set. having only one scene would give him a lot of free time to roam
Mark Hamill is a little bit worried about how excited fans are getting about this December's Star Wars: The Force Awakens, it seems.
He went on to suggest that the audience should "forget about it [and] look forward to all the summer movies," adding, "I'm telling you, it's just a movie. These people that build it up in their minds like it's going to be the second coming of, I don't know what they're bound to be disappointed."
For example, where's the third lightsaber in the three-way lightsaber fight coming from now if Luke isn't on the same planet as the climax?
Couldn't it just be the case that either Rey or Finn have Luke's lightsaber and the other one has a blaster? Or one gets knocked out early in the fight, so the other has to take up the lightsaber?
I'm glad there's more stuff about the enigma that's Poe. Oscar Isaac is a damn good actor.
Wait so what is the universe like now like 40 odd years later? The Empire and Rebels are still at it? How does that make sense?
Why would the empire fall just because the Emperor gets killed? This makes more sense, imo. Yes, it was a huge blow but not the winning battle yet.
The montage at the end of Jedi makes it apparent the empire suffered a devastating blow. It seems pretty self explanatory at face value.
Analog?
As someone has mentioned, the idea of a cold war between more evenly matched sides (e.g. the Empire won't be the juggernaut it once was, and the Rebels won't be the rag tag fly by night operation they once were) seems plausible.
It certainly does sound intriguing, but if we're treating ROTJ SE as canon, it feels like that isn't the implied outcome at all.
Why would the empire fall just because the Emperor gets killed? This makes more sense, imo. Yes, it was a huge blow but not the winning battle yet.
Fun Fact: The now defunct EU called those "celebrations" riots that were quickly quelled to try and explain this.It certainly does sound intriguing, but if we're treating ROTJ SE as canon, it feels like that isn't the implied outcome at all.
Fun Fact: The now defunct EU called those "celebrations" riots that were quickly quelled to try and explain this.
We only saw 3-4 planets in the end of ROTJ. The Empire was quite a bit bigger than that. Not to mention they were celebrating the death of the Emperor, those planets were still likely filled with Imperials that would try to dissuade the protests/celebrations.
Ive apparently said later that this was "just a conversation" and that he definitely had nothing to say about the controversial crossguards. Instead, Parker reports, Ive argued that the lightsaber should look uneven. "I thought it would be interesting if it were less precise, and just a little bit more spitty," said Ive, adding that the new weapon could be "more analog and more primitive, and I think, in that way, somehow more ominous."
Are you suggesting Jar Jar may have been gunned down shortly after that scene?
New rumor saysLuke is only in one scene and its the very last scene.
If true this movie is going to piss a majority of the fan base off lol
I actually wouldn't mind it too much. Would be a cool ending, leaves you wanting more and sets up the next movie.
I want Luke to go all old in one the movies.
I mind it bc if true,We won't be seeing Han, Luke and Leia together again. People want to see that and if Han dying is true and this is true, then we won't see that, which sucks
Oh crap, that's a good point actually. I don't know, I mean not seeing that happen would definitely blow but at the same time,maybe luke learning about Han's demise at the hands of his own son after the fact could offer him a good character arc, where he tries to figure out what to do and how to react
Looks like the final scene were revealed way back:
There is a lot of material crossed out with a big black marker over some of the details in the files. ... For people who are familiar with Skellig Michael, there is a reference to some character being filmed on the lower staircase on the island which is on the approach to the monastic settlement at the top. The monastery on the island is described as "offering numerous attractive camera positions for the film crew" and "given its cinematic potential." So it seems that the monastic huts on the island will feature in the film itelf.
http://forums.superherohype.com/showpost.php?p=30721017&postcount=721
This lines up with what Jason described or his call sheet perfectly. My guess is this is 100% true.
I don't think anyone should be doubting the stuff he's saying, especially if it's coming from the callsheets.
The question is how does the stuff he hasn't shared make the ending of the movie make any sort of dramatic sense given the beginning of the movie and the reason they go on their adventure.
Luke not showing up until the last 5 minutes? I say bollocks.
Luke not showing up until the last 30-40 minutes? Quite possible.
Yeah, I tend to agree with this. I know MSW has been reliable as of late, but as I said before this is a little too much to take. I imagine Abrams is FULLY aware how many people he will royally piss off if he holds Luke back until right before the credits roll. Does he care? Well, maybe not...
Not that it'd ruin the movie necessarily. But even if the movie is great, the internet blowback from giving Luke next to zero screen time would be epic.
We've gone from Luke has been in hiding/in captivity since RotJ or for several years to Luke is an evil cyborg to Luke is crazy and guarding a super weapon to... Luke is in the movie for a minute right before the credits roll. Doesn't make much sense.
Don't you just want to see a good movie?
Isn't this saying he was part of one on location shoot at Skellig Castle? Are the shoots at Pinewood Studio considered a different type of shoot? Could he have been in additional scenes shot on a sound stage at Pinewood that aren't considered 'on location'?